I need to question the wisdom of declaring something a 'national crypto currency' when there are so many ways it WILL go wrong.
From fraud, identity theft, to various issues with the 'distribution' plan itself, this coin just seems too ambitious for its own good. No matter how much you trumpet the technology behind the crypto currency, we know it can be made vulnerable technically. Not to mention, people may not directly attack the technology for a time being, but DEFINITELY can control or influence those that distribute, trade or own them (human beings).
You are trying to deposit a new currency into a population of an entire country, and you don't even reveal your own identity, or offer up some kind of assurance as to who you are, what you do, etc?
What is the guarantee that this 'airdrop' will actually happen? What if you are simply baiting people into hyping up this coin?
Right now, the coin is valued close to 0.05 btc per AUR. The 'hard fork' is 2-3 weeks away. Iceland's entire GDP is a little over 12 billion USD. are you telling me you are prepared to throw in over 3% of a country's yearly GDP in the form of a relatively young and untested technology and expect little to no serious complications in this 'plan'?
This isn't anything near launching a pretty new coin. It's a whole different game, and your 'plan' sounds flimsy at best as of this moment. Why would any nation 'adopt' a currency of a whole new technology that has proven vulnerable in the past, without any oversight or regulation, as the basis of their economy even by 1%?
Best you can hope for is this coin being valued at 10% of what it is now, which is what the base price was before the hype.
That is, if you are even going through with this ridiculously ambitious plan with little else other than your overly simplistic words. You left out about 1000000 other variables as to why this could not even take off, or go very VERY wrong.
Unless you come forward to reveal who you are, or provide some kind of much MUCH more detailed ideas that address extreme number of variables and problems concerning this idea, there is little to identify this coin from a pump and dump that uses the 'potential' of 'adoption by financially troubled nation' to fill your own pockets.
Answer the numerous concerns listed on this thread. Starting with addressing how this coin could possibly hold a big stake when 99% of the mining power will be off the country.
If you are trying to take advantage of supposed 'bitcoin-friendly and tired-of-fiat-country wants to jump on a logo with nothing else to back it up', and not even bothering to introduce a gravity well in the beginning of the coin, I see all the red flags of a hyped up dump scam with (in joe schmuck public eye) seemingly elaborate plan that 'backs up' your hype - another huge red flag.
Right now, it's either looking like an extremely cheeky scam, or just a very delusional and over-reaching (that's putting it mildly) attempt at some kind of crypto revolution by a lone boy behind a computer. Neither inspires any kind of confidence to replace or even chip at a fiat of a relatively small nation state.
Huge risk but if it works it would be the biggest thing since cryptos, I agree with a lot of your points but there are even more variables than anybody can contemplate. Right now this is just an experiment, I hope it works though because it would be good for cryptos in general.
