Author

Topic: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9 - page 123. (Read 148347 times)

SGN
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
due to "dark" history around a bminer I have stopped use it and switched to ewbf back.....

on the flypool.org (rig/pool):

bminer (devfee on): 5250/~4900
ewbf (devfee off): 5010/~5000

I will continue the comparisons.......
newbie
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Very much agree.

+1.  Haven't started using the miner because of the concerns.  Transparency is the keyword here...

i too have stopped using bminer because of these concerns

i switched to dstm
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
From a week ago my rigs begin spam this:

[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)

About 10 times and than start the miner. This is not the first question on this topic about this bug, but I did not find any answers.

ATTENTION! How to fix this? How to stop this spamshit?



simply don't use it again and go back to other
newbie
Activity: 102
Merit: 0
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Very much agree.

+1.  Haven't started using the miner because of the concerns.  Transparency is the keyword here...
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Hi, Realbminer!
I'm wondering if you can do it so that the miner worked in the background?
Thanks!)
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
From a week ago my rigs begin spam this:

[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)
[INFO] [time-date] Checking updates
[WARN] [time-date] Failed to read from network: Get : net/http: request canceled while waiting for connection (Client.Timeout exceed while awating headers)

About 10 times and than start the miner. This is not the first question on this topic about this bug, but I did not find any answers.

ATTENTION! How to fix this? How to stop this spamshit?

full member
Activity: 392
Merit: 101
Also keen to use this, but the private connection people are worrying about has me worried too.
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Well put.

Dev really needs to fully address these concerns.


I agree. We need to know what this is about. Other miners are not doing this.

agreed!

we are all waiting on your response bminer
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Well put.

Dev really needs to fully address these concerns.


I agree. We need to know what this is about. Other miners are not doing this.
jr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 2
I have 2 identical rigs, 1 is fine. 1 will not connect and mine, It spams..

Connection failed due to A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond., retrying in 5 seconds
Connection failed due to A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond., retrying in 5 seconds


WTF is this?
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Well put.

Dev really needs to fully address these concerns.
member
Activity: 297
Merit: 10
I also agree with all you said, things should be done differently in BMiner, but what i dont ge't is the fact that this crypto-dude is so vigorous in talking shit about a miner app, but still uses it. That is f**** retarded in my book.

That's because you apparently don't bother reading more than the first 10 words on the landing page. It seems to be the norm nowadays, and also a reason why bminer is getting away with his shady attitude and product. I don't owe you an explanation, but if you want to "ge't" the facts, then you should go back to this thread and read why I'm kind of forced to use bminer for equihash instead of ewbf or dstm.

I will continue to be critical of bminer even if I use it. I'm not surprised that you can't get your head around that concept (given I uncovered a scenario which hurts miners due to this unexplained and very shady tactic, yet your sense of protest was triggered by why I try/use it).
jr. member
Activity: 119
Merit: 3
I also agree with all you said, things should be done differently in BMiner, but what i dont ge't is the fact that this crypto-dude is so vigorous in talking shit about a miner app, but still uses it. That is f**** retarded in my book.

Well my be he want to see this miner app to be top & my be he care about see Bminer on correct road ... is nothing wrong on that Smiley more good miner apps to choice is benefit for all community if it will end in a fair constructive competition Smiley We live in free world & all we can chouse what we like to use or to be stubborn believe in something, is not need to be high IQ person to get what is best for our needs or for what any of us want

personally i wish to see dstm, bminer, excavator & claymore in a real competition because then miner community & dev it will have a win win situation Wink but till then we take what we like & fell is best for our needs coz each have pro & bad thing Smiley

cheers
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
I also agree with all you said, things should be done differently in BMiner, but what i dont ge't is the fact that this crypto-dude is so vigorous in talking shit about a miner app, but still uses it. That is f**** retarded in my book.
jr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 2
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.



Very much agree.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 184
Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.
...

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.

Whoa there, weiner-dog... If people don't make a big deal out of secret, encrypted connections made every 15 minutes by a miner program then what incentive is there for the dev to explain it, much less stop doing it?

Complaints like this are not about being an asshole, rather, it's to encourage a bit more transparency and accountability from the dev.

Frankly, I won't use a miner that does this secret squirrel shit, either, even if it is slightly - and I do mean, /slightly/ - faster than the competition.

So if bminer wants my business then he needs to A) improve stability - if your miner is 3% faster than the competition but it crashes with no outward appearance of doing so it isn't faster anymore; B) stop messaging home base every 15 minutes for "licensing information and updates" - what license, and why check for updates every 15 minutes when they aren't released but every month or so?; C) lower the devfee - I know dstm and ewbf charge 2% and the dev thinks he's entitled to the same, but that's not how capitalism works - when you are a newcomer to a field with entrenched competition you can't expect to immediately charge the same as said competition and thrive.

newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Using this miner

How much hash/sol would a 1080Ti give in comparison to a rx580/590 ?

newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Ok, this is fu**ing ridiculous ... you need to remove that shady private connection to your website:

Code:
[WARN] [2018-02-13T05:13:02Z] Failed to read from the network: Get : dial tcp: lookup api.bminer.me on 192.168.1.1:53: read udp 192.168.1.22:42393->192.168.1.1:53: i/o timeout

Your server went down and the miner stopped mining. This is seriously not cool. Besides being shady AF, you are also costing us money. My miners just wasted 1h ...

Find a way to remove this shady and ridiculous private connection. Otherwise, EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MINER! Your rigs can go down whenever @realbminer wishes, or when his server goes down, etc.

// Yes, my internet connection was solid when this was happening.

Dude are you fucking retarded or what? You keep pissing on BMiner, yet you are still using it. There is something seriously wrong with you. If you dont like it GTFO and use some other miner and stop being such an asshole.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
5.4.0 has released.

  • Fix a reconnection issue in the network layer.
  • Show additional statistics in console.
  • Allow cross-domain requests to access the API.
  • Fix the compatibility issue with docker.
  • Introduce the option -share-check to make the time of recovering from no accepted shares configurable.

Happy mining!

Tnx.

Need additional statistics in console :

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Strings)
[Info] Total: xxx Sol/s xxx N/s Avr.speed: xxx Sol/s Uptime: xxx d:h:m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Strings)


Agree. And thanks realbminer for nice update
newbie
Activity: 176
Merit: 0
5.4.0 has released.

  • Fix a reconnection issue in the network layer.
  • Show additional statistics in console.
  • Allow cross-domain requests to access the API.
  • Fix the compatibility issue with docker.
  • Introduce the option -share-check to make the time of recovering from no accepted shares configurable.

Happy mining!

Tnx.

Need additional statistics in console :

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Strings)
[Info] Total: xxx Sol/s xxx N/s Avr.speed: xxx Sol/s Share A/R x/x Uptime: xxx d:h:m    (A/R means Accept/Reject)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Strings)

Need additional statistics in api browser what card caused reject share. Accept/Reject card by card.
Jump to: