The problem was not a firewall rule... imposter had helped to create a masternode. Later lost the user here her masternodes.
Oh, didn't know that because the original post i quoted did not note that. That's unfortunate, sadly people like that do still exist. Although common sense should tell you not to trust someone online blindly, especially with high values like that no matter how much trust they have.
the forthcoming 51% attack will take these lame "masternodes" offline whereas we switch to development of BTX (the real BSD) :-D see how that works?<<
I never did really realize the point of masternodes either, except for gaining some profits slowly. Usually the cost is very high. However it's encouraging of holding the coins instead of selling them. However i still do think that PoS is alot better because it's fair to everyone and not just those who have the most to invest. Was that "forthcoming 51%" attack a threat or what? I doubt that the attack has that much hashrate
How is BTX the real BSD? As far as i am concerned, they are seperate coins on different blockchains.
I have to retract (and apologize for) the "compiled binaries" part. You're right, the instructions must be clear for everyone and working. The release notes should contain a warning about known big issues like this one ("not available for Linux" -- WTF?).
I hope that BSD code will regain the qualities that attracted so many supporters. That's a pretty thick "glitch".
BTW, I tested dArkjON's script. It doesn't work on last version of BSD and the culprit seems to be related to a boost component... or a misplaced backslash
Are you talking about
this script? Also BSD is available for GNU/Linux systems, you just need to know how to compile it. There's no point of using binaries on those systems, if it is available as open source and easy to compile. If you have problems with the compiling, just send me a PM with your operating system and i'll send you a step to step guide for compiling the thing as a whole.
bitcoin to 100K <<< 
