is this coin profitable? how many coin per day with 1TB?
Around 1k a day per TB I think. Profitability is still pretty good considering my GPU rig is running anyway, all I have to do is add HDDs
Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 1125. (Read 2170895 times)
August 28, 2014, 02:20:36 AM
Around 1k a day per TB I think. Profitability is still pretty good considering my GPU rig is running anyway, all I have to do is add HDDs
August 28, 2014, 02:14:17 AM
is this coin profitable? how many coin per day with 1TB?
August 28, 2014, 01:56:30 AM
Windows Storage Spaces Feedback
I wanted to follow-up and share my experience with using Windows 8.1 storage spaces to create a storage pool with several USB3 drives and a single logical volume. (about 13TB, only 4TB of plots created) I set this up with Resiliency type of Simple thinking if I had a drive failure I would only lose the plots on that drive which I was ok with. Everything was smooth sailing with this until I had a drive failure. When a drive went out I lost the whole volume. I would see the failed drive with status of Retired and when attempting to remove it from the pool it would error out, even after replacing the disk with another.
After some additional investigation it turns out the "Simple Resiliency" is really like RAID 0 where it stripes the data across all disks without parity. (I did not think it was doing this) I learned this the hard way and need to create all of my plots over again. This time I will use the parity Resiliency type which should be the same as RAID 5 and also give me one logical volume with the ability to expand it as well.
I wanted to follow-up and share my experience with using Windows 8.1 storage spaces to create a storage pool with several USB3 drives and a single logical volume. (about 13TB, only 4TB of plots created) I set this up with Resiliency type of Simple thinking if I had a drive failure I would only lose the plots on that drive which I was ok with. Everything was smooth sailing with this until I had a drive failure. When a drive went out I lost the whole volume. I would see the failed drive with status of Retired and when attempting to remove it from the pool it would error out, even after replacing the disk with another.
After some additional investigation it turns out the "Simple Resiliency" is really like RAID 0 where it stripes the data across all disks without parity. (I did not think it was doing this) I learned this the hard way and need to create all of my plots over again. This time I will use the parity Resiliency type which should be the same as RAID 5 and also give me one logical volume with the ability to expand it as well.
so paintfull, im using spanned volumn to merge all my different size disks to one big volume, a little bit worry
August 28, 2014, 01:55:00 AM
620 miners? It was 750 miners three days ago. This coin is headed down the toilet.......
what you see is the total miners, can you understand the meaning of " Total Blocks 5961 mined by 620 miners"? 750 miners are mining, only 620 miners have mined at least one block , still hundred miners haven't mined a block,may be still generating plots
I think kids also don't understand how many people are waiting to get their new HDDs in the mail. The reason this hasn't bubbled yet is because those people don't want to promote the coin and have difficulty increase before they get in.
This dynamic alone is why you can still buy dirt cheap. Once people get rigs going, this is headed moonbound.
Early adopters/investors are getting in now while kids are still talking about IPO/ICO, anon tx, and PoS nonsense.
August 28, 2014, 01:03:22 AM
620 miners? It was 750 miners three days ago. This coin is headed down the toilet.......
what you see is the total miners, can you understand the meaning of " Total Blocks 5961 mined by 620 miners"? 750 miners are mining, only 620 miners have mined at least one block , still hundred miners haven't mined a block,may be still generating plots
August 28, 2014, 12:40:09 AM
Windows Storage Spaces Feedback
I wanted to follow-up and share my experience with using Windows 8.1 storage spaces to create a storage pool with several USB3 drives and a single logical volume. (about 13TB, only 4TB of plots created) I set this up with Resiliency type of Simple thinking if I had a drive failure I would only lose the plots on that drive which I was ok with. Everything was smooth sailing with this until I had a drive failure. When a drive went out I lost the whole volume. I would see the failed drive with status of Retired and when attempting to remove it from the pool it would error out, even after replacing the disk with another.
After some additional investigation it turns out the "Simple Resiliency" is really like RAID 0 where it stripes the data across all disks without parity. (I did not think it was doing this) I learned this the hard way and need to create all of my plots over again. This time I will use the parity Resiliency type which should be the same as RAID 5 and also give me one logical volume with the ability to expand it as well.
I wanted to follow-up and share my experience with using Windows 8.1 storage spaces to create a storage pool with several USB3 drives and a single logical volume. (about 13TB, only 4TB of plots created) I set this up with Resiliency type of Simple thinking if I had a drive failure I would only lose the plots on that drive which I was ok with. Everything was smooth sailing with this until I had a drive failure. When a drive went out I lost the whole volume. I would see the failed drive with status of Retired and when attempting to remove it from the pool it would error out, even after replacing the disk with another.
After some additional investigation it turns out the "Simple Resiliency" is really like RAID 0 where it stripes the data across all disks without parity. (I did not think it was doing this) I learned this the hard way and need to create all of my plots over again. This time I will use the parity Resiliency type which should be the same as RAID 5 and also give me one logical volume with the ability to expand it as well.
August 28, 2014, 12:38:27 AM
my computer can not submit shares to the pool, is every body ok with the pool mining?
August 28, 2014, 12:35:18 AM
620 miners? It was 750 miners three days ago. This coin is headed down the toilet.......
August 28, 2014, 12:25:32 AM
Total Blocks 5961 mined by 620 miners
seems 620 miners now,,difficulty raise much,,wait for one thousand miners
August 28, 2014, 12:05:01 AM
Xeon E3-1245, 3.3Ghz:
41 Percent done. 3580 nonces/minute
i7-3770, 3.4Ghz
46 Percent done. 4252 nonces/minute
i7-4770k @ 4.0Ghz:
2 Percent done. 4942 nonces/minute
Phenom 2 1090T, 3.2Ghz 6-core:
0 Percent done. 3301 nonces/minute
41 Percent done. 3580 nonces/minute
i7-3770, 3.4Ghz
46 Percent done. 4252 nonces/minute
i7-4770k @ 4.0Ghz:
2 Percent done. 4942 nonces/minute
Phenom 2 1090T, 3.2Ghz 6-core:
0 Percent done. 3301 nonces/minute
2 x Xeon X5650, 2.66-3.06Ghz 6 core (24 threads) with 9800-10300 nonces/minute
August 28, 2014, 12:04:42 AM
my bad....I was thinking 8191 was 4gb memory....I have 8gb total on my machine. Lowered the value to 2k and I'm generating plots! Thanks guys!
August 28, 2014, 12:00:28 AM
I'm getting an error when running run_generate:
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
With a stagger size of 8191 you need a lot more than 1000m. Either increase it to ~6000m or lower the stagger size.
August 27, 2014, 11:54:14 PM
I'm getting an error when running run_generate:
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
With a stagger size of 8191 you need a lot more than 1000m. Either increase it to ~6000m or lower the stagger size.
August 27, 2014, 11:52:14 PM
I'm getting an error when running run_generate:
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
Any ideas? I've tried lowering the amount of memory down to 500m, didn't do anything different than the 1000m I have it at now.
August 27, 2014, 11:51:37 PM
Mined 0 block with 3.5 TB over 3 days. Didn't expect so difficult to solo mine now.
August 27, 2014, 11:31:54 PM
I believe we will see around 3-5k sat at the first real peak.
Curious where your getting that number from.
From calculating market cap vs coins at the time of the bubble.
At 2k sat, the market cap will be between 800,000-1 million. (1 million would be assuming there are 100 million coins at that time)
Being the first HDD coin, you can expect growth similar to LTC or DRK.
We will be in top 10 market cap by end of the year, as long as no crazy premine or something happens.
I never really looked at it like that. Makes sense though
It has a new tech like LTC and DRK. So as long as the Dev doesn't have some ridiculous plan to kill his work there will be a MASSIVE upswing
Really amazing.
August 27, 2014, 11:03:05 PM
I believe we will see around 3-5k sat at the first real peak.
Curious where your getting that number from.
From calculating market cap vs coins at the time of the bubble.
At 2k sat, the market cap will be between 800,000-1 million. (1 million would be assuming there are 100 million coins at that time)
Being the first HDD coin, you can expect growth similar to LTC or DRK.
We will be in top 10 market cap by end of the year, as long as no crazy premine or something happens.
August 27, 2014, 10:58:52 PM
I believe we will see around 3-5k sat at the first real peak.
Curious where your getting that number from.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's based off of market caps. With our current supply of 5941 blocks * 10000 coins per block = 59410000 BURST, at at a current price of 0.00000256BTC (256 satoshis) and BTC at $513.60, the current market cap is around $78100. At a price of 3k sats (0.00003000) if BTC stays the same, the market cap today would be around $915389, or close to a million. However, keep in mind 3.6 million coins enter the ecosystem daily, so at a price of 3k sats, the market cap would be increasing by around $55468 per day, whereas at a price of 256 sats (current), the market cap is only growing by $4733 per day.
Who knows what the market cap will be when, but it's a good tool to approximate prices based on personal assumptions.
August 27, 2014, 10:42:19 PM
I believe we will see around 3-5k sat at the first real peak.
Curious where your getting that number from.
August 27, 2014, 10:41:16 PM
I believe we will see around 3-5k sat at the first real peak.
I certainly hope so, make me regret selling the 160k or so I did. haha. But hey, had to pay for my new drives!
I put up a buy order for 200 sats. It doesn't look like I'm going to get lucky.
Keep them there. You may get lucky.
Jump to: