Author

Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 524. (Read 2171056 times)

hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
poloniex looks kinda almost sold out of burst.

Total on sale left 5.8 million
full member
Activity: 248
Merit: 100
I'm not real
If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.

no one has checked it...

[---]

This slightly contradictory... Explain, please.

several ppl asked if it was vetted. no response in affirmative.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.

no one has checked it...

[---]

This slightly contradictory... Explain, please.
full member
Activity: 248
Merit: 100
I'm not real
If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
no one has checked it...

besides, I've been testing a version of Blago's miner that deals with memory issues... so far so good. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250

This is not new news. I've been working with vbecas on ATs since mid november integrating, updating, fixing, and adding things. Things were originally quiet as I didn't know how it would go, but now the AT system seems to be running stable on testnet, and is close to releasable.

Thank you for the good news.

Haha, agree  Smiley Didn't know about it so great news!
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000

This is not new news. I've been working with vbecas on ATs since mid november integrating, updating, fixing, and adding things. Things were originally quiet as I didn't know how it would go, but now the AT system seems to be running stable on testnet, and is close to releasable.

Thank you for the good news.
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
This is not new news. I've been working with vbecas on ATs since mid november integrating, updating, fixing, and adding things. Things were originally quiet as I didn't know how it would go, but now the AT system seems to be running stable on testnet, and is close to releasable.

Neither of the devs you mentioned have anything to do with this implementation.

Regarding rebasing, burst is already on 1.3.2 which has everything in the db and doesn't need rescans. I haven't looked farther yet to see what else has changed.

Thanks for clarification. Indeed my info is out of date, I somewhat missed 1.1.5 release. 1.3.2->1.3.4 is not as drastic (to backport interesting APIs, like 458a70e84c9bfed898e64d278eb7a548f65f27a8 and 5e11030d37b354c2359ba1d3006d016cbe0efb48).

If vbecas gets a burst wallet, I'd be happy to throw some coins at him.

Some background tidbits:
Jean-Luc voicing his reservations why NXT does not want AT
vbecas mentioning his possibly jumping ship to burst
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

Check with burstdev about his schedule regarding rebase past 1.3.1. There have been some drastic changes in 1.3.2 onwards making merges non-trivial. AT are planned for NXT 1.4/1.5. Personally, I'm not sold on the idea of funding NXT dev when burst is not in hurry to follow bleeding edge nxt (which is imo a good idea).

And there is also this stigma of assorted drama wrt paid dev in NXT (look up 'automated transactions bluemeanie jl777' in google - all very amusing, not sure some people would want to be associated with that).
This is not new news. I've been working with vbecas on ATs since mid november integrating, updating, fixing, and adding things. Things were originally quiet as I didn't know how it would go, but now the AT system seems to be running stable on testnet, and is close to releasable.

Neither of the devs you mentioned have anything to do with this implementation.

Regarding rebasing, burst is already on 1.3.2 which has everything in the db and doesn't need rescans. I haven't looked farther yet to see what else has changed.
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
You're saying that you would prefer that we don't integrate in ATs until after Nxt has them?  If we don't take risks and try to get our name known then we are always a Nxt clone.

Nah, it depends on what burstdev plans to do. Is 1.3.1 where burst diverges from NXT for good? Or are there plans to develop alongside? To give some perspective - asset tracking was reworked significantly in bleeding edge nxt to the point almost all interesting bits are in db (finally! one does not need to re-parse blockchain anymore...). This is clearly related to DAC (which is huge undertaking in itself, and needs a lot of small foundations built first).

This is why I'm vary - perhaps its a bit too early to start collecting funds when there is very little known whats actually planned on the technical side of things.

Also yes bluemeanie and the way that was handled was bad.. by that was a totally different developer.. why does that apply here?

Personally? NXT, DAC and forum member with dubious rep bringing it up, all in same sentence. The google results read almost like strange dejavu.
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 503
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

Check with burstdev about his schedule regarding rebase past 1.3.1. There have been some drastic changes in 1.3.2 onwards making merges non-trivial. AT are planned for NXT 1.4/1.5. Personally, I'm not sold on the idea of funding NXT dev when burst is not in hurry to follow bleeding edge nxt (which is imo a good idea).

And there is also this stigma of assorted drama wrt paid dev in NXT (look up 'automated transactions bluemeanie jl777' in google - all very amusing, not sure some people would want to be associated with that).

You're saying that you would prefer that we don't integrate in ATs until after Nxt has them?  If we don't take risks and try to get our name known then we are always a Nxt clone.

Addressing the point regarding getting the developer on board, burstcoin is all for with integrating in ATs.

Also yes bluemeanie and the way that was handled was bad.. by that was a totally different developer.. why does that apply here?
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

Check with burstdev about his schedule regarding rebase past 1.3.1. There have been some drastic changes in 1.3.2 onwards making merges non-trivial. AT are planned for NXT 1.4/1.5. Personally, I'm not sold on the idea of funding NXT dev when burst is not in hurry to follow bleeding edge nxt (which is imo a good idea).

And there is also this stigma of assorted drama wrt paid dev in NXT (look up 'automated transactions bluemeanie jl777' in google - all very amusing, not sure some people would want to be associated with that).
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.

As I asked several times, which forum members have checked it and where is the source?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

However, the Automated Transaction developer is asking for funding and I would really like to make sure that he gets paid a reasonable amount for his many months of work. It's in our best interest as well to make sure he's invested into Burst since he's a good developer and we need more of them.  I'm chipping in 250k Burst myself.  Anyone else mind chipping in some donations?

I'd like to get him at least a million, maybe two million Burst.

Additionally, could someone write up a press release for these?

I have set-up a wallet for this purpose if you would like to donate: BURST-NTAZ-LX9T-BVB9-CN373

If mmmaybe is more trusted than me, seeing as how I'm new to the community, he could escrow for this instead.  Or we can use the built in escrow tool.  Just let me know if you want anything like this.


Great, great news Smiley Your contacts are awesome.

Are you confident he wants Burst and not BTC? I think it's great if he take Bursts if he consider it a investment and gets involved a bit through that, but if he only see it as "work" and dumps the Bursts, BTC would be better. Can you (dubble) check that?

Would also be great if you explained why ATs are such a big deal. In layman's terms.  Wink

As for being escrow agent, I want to be upfront with the fact that I'm new to it. I guess the reason you mention me is that I was escrower for you very recently, and everything went very well? If you want me to do it, I'll of course will do it (for free) and make a thread on the forums so people can review the service. For me it doesn't matter, the important thing is someone does it. Nevril or AizenSou are good names, I think.


On another note, this is exactly how I believe we as a community can help develop Burst. Escrower or not, I'll surely will donate to this as well as to other Burst projects.


full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If you have problems with RAM performance use Runaurufu Burst Miner, change pool and directories in configuration.xml to fit your needs - tool has been checked by forum members and is clean - using it myself long time already.
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 503
Thanks for your effort but a negative rating from Gmaxwell ?
If you don't mind I would have Nevril as the one who manages the fund.

Just my 2 BURST.

Regards,

Aizen

Fine by me, but what happened with Gmaxwell, was that I mentioned that I was working on a method that would allow instant transactions and was considering patenting it.. he instantly dinged me because he hates patents and thought that I was patenting it so I could later patent troll instead of trying to protect the method I spent half a year figuring out and started working on.  Read his comment associated with the ding.. it's because he thought I was trying to patent something, he believes patents are a bad thing, and wanted people to later be able to contact him and fight the patent.

Not a fan of that guy.. just in general try arguing that Proof of Stake is reasonable with him and he gets pretty hostile.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

However, the Automated Transaction developer is asking for funding and I would really like to make sure that he gets paid a reasonable amount for his many months of work. It's in our best interest as well to make sure he's invested into Burst since he's a good developer and we need more of them.  I'm chipping in 250k Burst myself.  Anyone else mind chipping in some donations?

I'd like to get him at least a million, maybe two million Burst.

Additionally, could someone write up a press release for these?

I have set-up a wallet for this purpose if you would like to donate: BURST-NTAZ-LX9T-BVB9-CN373

If mmmaybe is more trusted than me, seeing as how I'm new to the community, he could escrow for this instead.  Or we can use the built in escrow tool.  Just let me know if you want anything like this.

Thanks for your effort but a negative rating from Gmaxwell ?
If you don't mind I would have Nevril as the one who manages the fund.

Just my 2 BURST.

Regards,

Aizen
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 503
I happened to get the guys who wrote Automated Transactions (aka Smart Contracts) for Nxt to agree to integrate them into Burst.  Nxt has delayed integration and Nxt is probably not going to be ready to add them for a while.

However, the Automated Transaction developer is asking for funding and I would really like to make sure that he gets paid a reasonable amount for his many months of work. It's in our best interest as well to make sure he's invested into Burst since he's a good developer and we need more of them.  I'm chipping in 250k Burst myself.  Anyone else mind chipping in some donations?

I'd like to get him at least a million, maybe two million Burst.

Additionally, could someone write up a press release for these?

If mmmaybe is more trusted than me, seeing as how I'm new to the community, he could escrow for this instead.  Or we can use the built in escrow tool.  Just let me know if you want anything like this.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

Source?

m3ta  Grin
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 503
When I get to the input a password to be used to generate an account number, Burst.today tool is giving me this error:
Quote
See the end of this message for details on invoking
just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

************** Exception Text **************
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array.
   at Burst.Form1.Button5_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Burst.Today Source\Burst.Today UI\BurstTodayUI\Burst\Form1.vb:line 750
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mevent)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.ButtonBase.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)


************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.34014 built by: FX45W81RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
Burst
    Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Burst.Today/Burst.Today/BurstTodayUI-master/Burst/bin/Debug/burst.exe
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic
    Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 12.0.20806.33440 built by: FX45W81RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
----------------------------------------
System
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.34239 built by: FX452RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Core
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.33440 built by: FX45W81RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Core/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Core.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Windows.Forms
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.33440 built by: FX45W81RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Windows.Forms/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Windows.Forms.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Drawing
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.33440 built by: FX45W81RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Drawing/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Drawing.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Runtime.Remoting
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.34243 built by: FX452RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Runtime.Remoting/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Runtime.Remoting.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Configuration
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.33440 built by: FX45W81RTMREL
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
----------------------------------------
System.Xml
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.34230 built by: FX452RTMGDR
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Windows/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Xml/v4.0_4.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089/System.Xml.dll
----------------------------------------
Ionic.Zip
    Assembly Version: 1.9.1.8
    Win32 Version: 1.9.1.8
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Burst.Today/Burst.Today/BurstTodayUI-master/Burst/bin/Debug/Ionic.Zip.DLL
----------------------------------------

************** JIT Debugging **************
To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this
application or computer (machine.config) must have the
jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section.
The application must also be compiled with debugging
enabled.

For example:


    


When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception
will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer
rather than be handled by this dialog box.

Assuming I'm not supposed to be using a pre-generate password or something?
Help plotting?  Maybe I'll try another tool just seemed like that would be the easiest..
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Several disks at use here:
4x 4 TB Seagate Backup Expansion (1 with lots of reallocated sectors, 1 with terrible sound while random-access)
1x Intenso 4TB
2x ProWorx 3TB
1x 5TB Seagate Backup Plus
Some other WD Red, Green, Black

-> about 48 TB net capacity
-> no defect
-> cheap Seagates are bad; atm no problem with other drives.


How many Burst do you get each day?

about 10k per day
You can check here http://burstcoin.eu/calculator
Jump to: