Author

Topic: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000 - page 525. (Read 2171056 times)

newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Several disks at use here:
4x 4 TB Seagate Backup Expansion (1 with lots of reallocated sectors, 1 with terrible sound while random-access)
1x Intenso 4TB
2x ProWorx 3TB
1x 5TB Seagate Backup Plus
Some other WD Red, Green, Black

-> about 48 TB net capacity
-> no defect
-> cheap Seagates are bad; atm no problem with other drives.


How many Burst do you get each day?

about 10k per day
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1042
https://locktrip.com/?refId=40964
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

i think all HDD are good... until they die!!!

i have WD Green/Red and seagate 2, 4 tb...

no fault until now...

so... all WD and Seagate are ok for me!!!
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
Crypti Community Manager
Several disks at use here:
4x 4 TB Seagate Backup Expansion (1 with lots of reallocated sectors, 1 with terrible sound while random-access)
1x Intenso 4TB
2x ProWorx 3TB
1x 5TB Seagate Backup Plus
Some other WD Red, Green, Black

-> about 48 TB net capacity
-> no defect
-> cheap Seagates are bad; atm no problem with other drives.


How many Burst do you get each day?
hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 503
at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/burst/#markets
we are at pos 81 of all Cryptos.

But only because the available supply is wrong and is not up to date.

Perhaps a few of us write a Mail via form at the bottom of the page to bring us a litte more up.

With correct supply we would be at place 73.

Good idea.. didn't realize we were off, who has been corresponding with coinmarketcap?
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Several disks at use here:
4x 4 TB Seagate Backup Expansion (1 with lots of reallocated sectors, 1 with terrible sound while random-access)
1x Intenso 4TB
2x ProWorx 3TB
1x 5TB Seagate Backup Plus
Some other WD Red, Green, Black

-> about 48 TB net capacity
-> no defect
-> cheap Seagates are bad; atm no problem with other drives.
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Hello,

I was plotting up an hdd and accidentally removed power.. when plugged in again the plotter stopped, I know the nonce it was writing. I've started plotting from that nonce, will this work?

I have 2 files now:
239..340_1_8129000_8192
and
239..340_6890202_8129000_8192

but the first file has nonces up to 6890202 - 8191, because I've interrupted it, should I change the filename to reflect the nonces it cotains?

Thanks again.. setup of this coin is quite a pain.. during holidays I may prepare some GUI.. and some smarter approach to plotting.. do you know if there's something already out there?

T.

(plot file size in Kb) / 256 = number of nonces
or
(plot file size in bytes) / (64*4096) = number of nonces

Thanks, yes that was clear, I was wondering if the filename has something to do with the way the miner will work later on? because I interrupted the plotting and I've tried to start from the nonce that was interrupted.
sr. member
Activity: 416
Merit: 250
Hello,

I was plotting up an hdd and accidentally removed power.. when plugged in again the plotter stopped, I know the nonce it was writing. I've started plotting from that nonce, will this work?

I have 2 files now:
239..340_1_8129000_8192
and
239..340_6890202_8129000_8192

but the first file has nonces up to 6890202 - 8191, because I've interrupted it, should I change the filename to reflect the nonces it cotains?

Thanks again.. setup of this coin is quite a pain.. during holidays I may prepare some GUI.. and some smarter approach to plotting.. do you know if there's something already out there?

T.

(plot file size in Kb) / 256 = number of nonces
or
(plot file size in bytes) / (64*4096) = number of nonces
newbie
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
Hello,

I was plotting up an hdd and accidentally removed power.. when plugged in again the plotter stopped, I know the nonce it was writing. I've started plotting from that nonce, will this work?

I have 2 files now:
239..340_1_8129000_8192
and
239..340_6890202_8129000_8192

but the first file has nonces up to 6890202 - 8191, because I've interrupted it, should I change the filename to reflect the nonces it cotains?

Thanks again.. setup of this coin is quite a pain.. during holidays I may prepare some GUI.. and some smarter approach to plotting.. do you know if there's something already out there?

T.
hero member
Activity: 619
Merit: 500
at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/burst/#markets
we are at pos 81 of all Cryptos.

But only because the available supply is wrong and is not up to date.

Perhaps a few of us write a Mail via form at the bottom of the page to bring us a litte more up.

With correct supply we would be at place 73.
hero member
Activity: 619
Merit: 500
There is no rules. I'm using several types of HDD. The worse are 2 TB Barracuda's. Almost everyone died during warranty. WD Green's and Red's - very similar: 2 Green's dead and one Red as well.

how long is the warranty at you country?
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

I had 4x3TB WD Greens running in a home NAS for 2.5 years. One disk just died but he remaining 3 are running along just fine.
Does that make WD greens bad? Maybe not, but since then I have learnt my lesson and have switched to red NAS-disks instead. Hopefully they will perform better then the greens.

There is no rules. I'm using several types of HDD. The worse are 2 TB Barracuda's. Almost everyone died during warranty. WD Green's and Red's - very similar: 2 Green's dead and one Red as well.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
2014/11/04 New version release 1.1.5 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9430317
2014/10/18 New version release 1.1.4 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9243567
2014/10/04 Escrow transactions enabled https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9060003
2014/09/27 New version release 1.1.3 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8988688
2014/09/14 New version release 1.1.2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.10040
2014/09/13 Stuck transactions statement: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8809198
2014/09/13 New version release 1.1.1 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8803319
2014/09/09 New version release 1.1.0 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8741673
2014/08/31 V2 pool now up https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8604606
2014/08/27 New version release 1.0.3: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8550499
2014/08/20 Pool now up: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8448276
2014/08/17 New version release 1.0.2: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8404060
2014/08/16 Statement regarding the difficulty adjustment: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8387248
2014/08/11 The pool situation: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8302521


looking at the trend of update from developer , it seems we are due for another update soon ?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
http://burst.cryptoport.io down for a couple of days.

Huh... and uray hasn't been on bitcointalk since Dec 6th. I hope he is ok  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
There was someone announcing forming of PR team a while ago. I wonder if its still on going?

After Wulfcastle's offer to help out with PR (see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9684608), I made a post about some ideas of a PR management team (see https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9687064).

It surely wasn't an announcement. I tried to describe how it's possible to think about PR. As Burst matures, I hope more and more community members understands the significance of PR. In our case, it means that:

1) PR initiatives have to come from the community and that we can do a lot to promote Burst;

2) PR work is just an another way to increase your stake in Burst, as wider adaptation will lead to a high price; and

3) Certain PR efforts can't be done freely by the community members but will require funding (e.g, Wulf's example withe hiring an actor for a voice-over to a promo video), and since Burst wasn't premined nor an IPO, the required funding has to come from the community. Participating in crowd-funding to get a certain PR activity done or donating to a devs-fund is also a way to increase the value of your investment.

The posts from us received some positive feedback but not a lot. I think we need to start thinking differently in the Burst community. Burst will not become a prime crypto solely by dev's technological innovation, but it will need a lot of community support.

Although the reactions weren't overwhelming to Wulf's suggestions or my idea of forming a PR management team, it at least led to discussions among a few members. What that will turn out to be is too early too say; however:

The most important is that the investors and miners start asking themselves what competences, qualities, knowledge and even funds they have/can offer to collectively promote Burst.

Only then can Burst become a major actor. So try to think a bit in this way: What can you contribute with to support Burst?
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
There was someone announcing forming of PR team a while ago. I wonder if its still on going?
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

I had 4x3TB WD Greens running in a home NAS for 2.5 years. One disk just died but he remaining 3 are running along just fine.
Does that make WD greens bad? Maybe not, but since then I have learnt my lesson and have switched to red NAS-disks instead. Hopefully they will perform better then the greens.

For a NAS WD Red is a good choice. In Backblaze's huge test (25,000 hard drives!), WB Green didn't stand out negatively, quite contrary to what m3ta states.

Best results did Hitachi/HGST show. What you clearly should stay away from is Seagate Barracuda (at least in a data center setting - or maybe not...).

Sources:

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-update-september-2014/

and (for a critical perspective on Backblaze's study):
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/02/17/backblaze_how_not_to_evaluate_disk_reliability/

hero member
Activity: 527
Merit: 500
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

I had 4x3TB WD Greens running in a home NAS for 2.5 years. One disk just died but he remaining 3 are running along just fine.
Does that make WD greens bad? Maybe not, but since then I have learnt my lesson and have switched to red NAS-disks instead. Hopefully they will perform better then the greens.

Unfortunately, many of us will never own enough drives to be able to tell their reliability with any reasonable degree of accuracy.

I only had truly bad experiences with "Deathstars" if you still remember those.

As far as greens go, only thing that had me worried for a bit with regards to Burst mining is their speed. However, that was squashed a few pages back
legendary
Activity: 1382
Merit: 1002
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

I had 4x3TB WD Greens running in a home NAS for 2.5 years. One disk just died but he remaining 3 are running along just fine.
Does that make WD greens bad? Maybe not, but since then I have learnt my lesson and have switched to red NAS-disks instead. Hopefully they will perform better then the greens.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
If you have free SATA-Ports on your motherboard I suggest WD Green 3TB or 4TB drives. They are cheap, fast and quite reliable. External USB3.0 Drives are also fine, just don't pick Intenso (had lots of problems with them).

Greens die often.
Please refrain from posting if you're spreading crap info.

Source?
Jump to: