Pages:
Author

Topic: 🔴[ANN][BURST][PoC] Burstcoin | Hard Fork Coming Approximately June 20th - page 53. (Read 375177 times)

full member
Activity: 147
Merit: 100
Web wallet is not working right now...How can I change reward recipient?Is there any working wallet?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
I've NEVER needed more than 5 days to plot a Seagate Archive 8TB - and that's on my GAMING machine that I don't have available TO plot on a "all the time" basis, and running XPlotter on the CPU.
 If it's taking you 15 days, you're doing something wrong.
1) Open the wallet, press "Plot", press plot with CPU. What can be wrong?
2) Good to hear that, but you are the only one, i think. 8Tb Seagate Archive drives can be plotted much faster with GPU and buffered plotting. But with CPU (or GPU direct) I've tested on several PC - the plotting speed is only about 5-6Mb/s. Any other drive is much faster.


 I've never gotten that AIO wallet to WORK.
 I've also never gotten GPU plotting to work at all.
 XPlotter, on the other hand, works well once I figured it out - not quite as fast as WPlotter BUT WPlotter doesn't plot optimised files.


 Are you perhaps plotting to a USB-connected drive? For direct plotting, that IS a ton slower - which is not the fault of the DRIVE.




Xplotter is the best in my opinion for speed when you take into account that it creates plots optimized already, sometimes tweaking the settings may help a little bit I remember adding more RAM and speed increased.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
I've NEVER needed more than 5 days to plot a Seagate Archive 8TB - and that's on my GAMING machine that I don't have available TO plot on a "all the time" basis, and running XPlotter on the CPU.
 If it's taking you 15 days, you're doing something wrong.
1) Open the wallet, press "Plot", press plot with CPU. What can be wrong?
2) Good to hear that, but you are the only one, i think. 8Tb Seagate Archive drives can be plotted much faster with GPU and buffered plotting. But with CPU (or GPU direct) I've tested on several PC - the plotting speed is only about 5-6Mb/s. Any other drive is much faster.


 I've never gotten that AIO wallet to WORK.
 I've also never gotten GPU plotting to work at all.
 XPlotter, on the other hand, works well once I figured it out - not quite as fast as WPlotter BUT WPlotter doesn't plot optimised files.


 Are you perhaps plotting to a USB-connected drive? For direct plotting, that IS a ton slower - which is not the fault of the DRIVE.

legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 2287
Wheel of Whales 🐳
how profitable, if there is 1 laptop?

1GB,10GB, 100GB, 1TB, 10TB, 100TB, 1PB,......
You need to provide more info!
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
how profitable, if there is 1 laptop?
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
You don't HAVE to plot all the drives on the same machine - you can plot on ANY machine as long as you don't duplicate nonce numbers.
There is no need in "other machines". 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously on i7.
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
I've NEVER needed more than 5 days to plot a Seagate Archive 8TB - and that's on my GAMING machine that I don't have available TO plot on a "all the time" basis, and running XPlotter on the CPU.
 If it's taking you 15 days, you're doing something wrong.
1) Open the wallet, press "Plot", press plot with CPU. What can be wrong?
2) Good to hear that, but you are the only one, i think. 8Tb Seagate Archive drives can be plotted much faster with GPU and buffered plotting. But with CPU (or GPU direct) I've tested on several PC - the plotting speed is only about 5-6Mb/s. Any other drive is much faster.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
You don't HAVE to plot all the drives on the same machine - you can plot on ANY machine as long as you don't duplicate nonce numbers.

I know that I can use any machine to plott but I have only one fast computer at home and this is my gaming machine  Wink
Tried it also with my notebook but 6 days for a PMR Drive is to much compared with 2 days on my PC.

 So you plot one on the notebook WHILE you are plotting 2 or 3 on the "gaming" PC.

 8-P

legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 2287
Wheel of Whales 🐳
You don't HAVE to plot all the drives on the same machine - you can plot on ANY machine as long as you don't duplicate nonce numbers.

I know that I can use any machine to plott but I have only one fast computer at home and this is my gaming machine  Wink
Tried it also with my notebook but 6 days for a PMR Drive is to much compared with 2 days on my PC.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

Total waste of money to buy the faster stuff JUST BECAUSE IT PLOTS FASTER.

Total waste of money to spend day by day with plotting HDDs instead of mining and earn money with faster stuff!


 A few days of lost income at a COST difference that greatly exceeds the lost income is NOT worth it.


 Exception for if you get lucky on buying an external 8TB that turns out to NOT have an Archive - then it's no difference in the cost.



 I'm not stating that the Archive drives are ALWAYS the low cost option - sometimes something else in on sale for less - I'm just stating that AVOIDING them because they take longer to plot makes ZERO sense if the alternatives are more than a couple bucks higher in cost.



Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.

 You don't HAVE to plot all the drives on the same machine - you can plot on ANY machine as long as you don't duplicate nonce numbers.

legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
CPU Plotting 1 SMR drive takes about 15days. So 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously 1 per thread on 1 PC. So it will take 15days for just plotting as it is. With some effort (and availability of faster drives) you can plot them faster.

 I've NEVER needed more than 5 days to plot a Seagate Archive 8TB - and that's on my GAMING machine that I don't have available TO plot on a "all the time" basis, and running XPlotter on the CPU.

 If it's taking you 15 days, you're doing something wrong.

hero member
Activity: 590
Merit: 500
Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
CPU Plotting 1 SMR drive takes about 15days. So 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously 1 per thread on 1 PC. So it will take 15days for just plotting as it is. With some effort (and availability of faster drives) you can plot them faster.
                                                                   
Or you can use GPU miner... Roll Eyes
It won't help you. The speed of direct plotting SMR 8Tb is only 5-6Mb/s.
You can just plot them with wplotter at 120 MB/s or so. not optimized but that doesnt really matter.
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
CPU Plotting 1 SMR drive takes about 15days. So 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously 1 per thread on 1 PC. So it will take 15days for just plotting as it is. With some effort (and availability of faster drives) you can plot them faster.
                                                                   
Or you can use GPU miner... Roll Eyes
It won't help you. The speed of direct plotting SMR 8Tb is only 5-6Mb/s.
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
Too weird to live,too rare to die ;)
Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
CPU Plotting 1 SMR drive takes about 15days. So 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously 1 per thread on 1 PC. So it will take 15days for just plotting as it is. With some effort (and availability of faster drives) you can plot them faster.
                                                                   
Or you can use GPU miner... Roll Eyes
Hix
legendary
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
I don`t find any working blockexplorer.
http://burstcoin.biz/ not working.
Can anyone help with it?
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
CPU Plotting 1 SMR drive takes about 15days. So 7 drives can be plotted simultaneously 1 per thread on 1 PC. So it will take 15days for just plotting as it is. With some effort (and availability of faster drives) you can plot them faster.
sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
Too weird to live,too rare to die ;)

Thats fine, but what is it in numbers? If I get 45secs I get XXXBursts. And if i get under 23secs I get XXX Burst + 2%/10%/20%/..... ?

The problem is that I don't see any difference in earnings between CPU miner, which runs only 160MB/s. The earnings fluctuates each day by 2 ... 5 ... 10 times.

You look at it wrong. Think of it as POS,just stake are not the coins but hdd space... Wink

If your miner can read all alocated space before new block,than it's fast enough. You don't gain anything by increasing read speed.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 2287
Wheel of Whales 🐳

Total waste of money to buy the faster stuff JUST BECAUSE IT PLOTS FASTER.

Total waste of money to spend day by day with plotting HDDs instead of mining and earn money with faster stuff!


 A few days of lost income at a COST difference that greatly exceeds the lost income is NOT worth it.


 Exception for if you get lucky on buying an external 8TB that turns out to NOT have an Archive - then it's no difference in the cost.



 I'm not stating that the Archive drives are ALWAYS the low cost option - sometimes something else in on sale for less - I'm just stating that AVOIDING them because they take longer to plot makes ZERO sense if the alternatives are more than a couple bucks higher in cost.



Ok maybe I should think smaller...i have started burst mining with 7x 8TB HDDs and my workstation was busy with plotting them for more than 16 days/24h (one time I had a blue screen after 36h  Angry )
Plotting the same TBs on SMR HDDs with my setup could be easy took more than 42 days! Thats to much time for me and my workstation CPU under 100% fire.
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106

 The reality is that with very optimized plotting you can get it to read faster but it takes 47 seconds for my 8tb drive to be read which is less than the average block time

 My current "big miner" runs on an AMD FX-8570, and currently has an 8TB Archive and a 8TB Compute (and a smaller drive) - the Compute reads about 5% faster than the Archive, and BOTH are under 40 seconds using Blago's miner if I'm not doing anything else on the machine.

 Anything under a minute is tolerable IMO, anything under 30 secs is very good - it's all about getting read before the next block pops up, and it's pretty rare for a block to take less than 30 secs and somewhat uncommon for it to take less than 1 minute.
Thats fine, but what is it in numbers? If I get 45secs I get XXXBursts. And if i get under 23secs I get XXX Burst + 2%/10%/20%/..... ?

With gpu miner (actually integrated Video) I get these:

Quote
2017-08-03 00:54:48.450  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : -------------------------------------------------------
2017-08-03 00:54:48.485  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : START block '388488', scoopNumber '3283', capacity '31989 GB'
2017-08-03 00:54:48.508  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       :       targetDeadline '12096000', baseTarget '107259', genSig '9c94db..'
2017-08-03 00:54:48.693  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '312187502' > '12096000' skipped
2017-08-03 00:54:48.693  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 1% done (0TB 80GB), avg.'80 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:54:48.742  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '146094717' > '12096000' skipped
2017-08-03 00:54:48.927  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '123372263' > '12096000' skipped
2017-08-03 00:54:49.005  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '38522605' > '12096000' skipped
2017-08-03 00:54:50.176  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '1404181' send (pool) [nonce '4012165637']
2017-08-03 00:54:50.476  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.core.round.Round        : dl '10526983' queued
2017-08-03 00:54:51.069  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 12% done (3TB 623GB), avg.'337 MB/s', eff.'364 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:54:51.578  INFO 7140 --- [skExecutor-1210] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       :       winner block '388487', 'BURST-RD7L-VYSA-MVGG-2GUPA'
2017-08-03 00:54:51.628  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.core.round.Round        : dl '8881138' queued
2017-08-03 00:54:53.423  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 23% done (7TB 167GB), avg.'351 MB/s', eff.'367 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:54:54.472  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.core.round.Round        : dl '3358695' queued
2017-08-03 00:54:54.975  INFO 7140 --- [skExecutor-1211] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : dl '1404181' confirmed!  [ 16d 6h 3m 1s ]
2017-08-03 00:54:55.824  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 34% done (10TB 710GB), avg.'354 MB/s', eff.'360 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:54:58.151  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 45% done (14TB 253GB), avg.'358 MB/s', eff.'371 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:00.598  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-44] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 56% done (17TB 797GB), avg.'357 MB/s', eff.'353 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:02.930  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 67% done (21TB 340GB), avg.'359 MB/s', eff.'370 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:05.756  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 78% done (24TB 931GB), avg.'351 MB/s', eff.'310 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:08.243  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-45] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 90% done (28TB 475GB), avg.'351 MB/s', eff.'347 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:09.398  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-41] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : read 'G:/Burst/plots' (7TB 994GB) in '20s 948ms'
2017-08-03 00:55:11.025  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-44] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : read 'D:/Burst/plots' (7TB 998GB) in '22s 574ms'
2017-08-03 00:55:11.487  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-45] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : read 'F:/Burst/plots' (7TB 998GB) in '23s 36ms'
2017-08-03 00:55:11.750  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : 100% done (31TB 989GB), avg.'335 MB/s', eff.'244 MB/s'
2017-08-03 00:55:11.750  INFO 7140 --- [  readerPool-46] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : read 'E:/Burst/plots' (7TB 998GB) in '23s 299ms'
2017-08-03 00:55:12.001  INFO 7140 --- [    roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine       : FINISH block '388488', best deadline '1404181', round time '23s 301ms'

The problem is that I don't see any difference in earnings between CPU miner, which runs only 160MB/s. The earnings fluctuates each day by 2 ... 5 ... 10 times.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
Total waste of money to buy the faster stuff JUST BECAUSE IT PLOTS FASTER.

Total waste of money to spend day by day with plotting HDDs instead of mining and earn money with faster stuff!


 A few days of lost income at a COST difference that greatly exceeds the lost income is NOT worth it.


 Exception for if you get lucky on buying an external 8TB that turns out to NOT have an Archive - then it's no difference in the cost.



 I'm not stating that the Archive drives are ALWAYS the low cost option - sometimes something else in on sale for less - I'm just stating that AVOIDING them because they take longer to plot makes ZERO sense if the alternatives are more than a couple bucks higher in cost.
Pages:
Jump to: