And remember there is a standing 500 cach bounty for zerolib integration.
Wasn't it 1000 CACHe bounty some time ago? Considering the difficulty (zerolib is sort of unfinished .... )
I think it was 1K
Topic: [ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane - page 60. (Read 224435 times)
Wasn't it 1000 CACHe bounty some time ago? Considering the difficulty (zerolib is sort of unfinished .... )
I think it was 1K
And remember there is a standing 500 cach bounty for zerolib integration.
Wasn't it 1000 CACHe bounty some time ago? Considering the difficulty (zerolib is sort of unfinished .... )
proposed commit:
https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin/commit/eee8b963367ccc2846c60a01a78485e74fb1292c
If anyone has objections, please state them. Or errors. submit a pull request if necessary
https://github.com/kalgecin/CACHeCoin/commit/eee8b963367ccc2846c60a01a78485e74fb1292c
If anyone has objections, please state them. Or errors. submit a pull request if necessary
I would like to offer a 10cache bounty (daily) for anyone that has a promotion business for spreading the word for open source alts.
And remember there is a standing 500 cach bounty for zerolib integration.
And on the git there is a test version up for everyone to try with a surprise in it.
And remember there is a standing 500 cach bounty for zerolib integration.
And on the git there is a test version up for everyone to try with a surprise in it.
Making a forced update to the way POW diff will be handled. New rule: if the time between last two PoW is more than twice the target time (more than 30 mins) diff is adjusted to meet the target 15 min. So if time will be 45 mins, diff will be divided by 3. Sounds fun? I hven't set the time or pushed an update yet, but current target time for the forced update is 20th April 2014 at 21:00 GMT. Will notify the exchanges when the time will be set for certain. Now I'm just checking if everyone is comfortable with this
I've done all I can for now, 650~ CACHe richer 
POS update is in the works and n factor just went up...its all coming together.
I've done what I can to prop the price up. For 24 hr change CACHe is 3rd on http://coinmarketcap.com/, +72.86%.
Now don't fuck it up by dumping on the whale bot. I'm hoping it will now fill in the gaps between 94k sat and 78k sat.
Now don't fuck it up by dumping on the whale bot. I'm hoping it will now fill in the gaps between 94k sat and 78k sat.
In case any of you are being scared by the ridiculously low value of Cache right now, don't be. It's pure and simple market manipulation by someone with a bot to drive prices down so they can gain lots of Cache, to presumably, one day, pump the hell out of it.
DON'T SELL
On another note, I bought a few hundred straight from Cryptsy's sell orders
DON'T SELL
On another note, I bought a few hundred straight from Cryptsy's sell orders
Cryptsy is relatively infested with bots, so it is no surprise that they are on the CACHe market too
I am gradually buying for the last few days too
Actually, DO SELL, so I can buy more CACH cheap
The sell depth is quite small (not many people want to sell at all), so even relatively low demand will drive the price up significantly ... throwing 1 BTC at cryptsy and buying CACHe would easily double the price.
The pool takes payout estimates from amount configured in the settings. This is works well for coins where payout is fixed or does not change very often (bitcoin, litecoin .....) and also for coins with random payout within certain range (DOGE), where you don't know the block amount, but you know the possible range.
Does not work very well for coins where the block reward changes gradually in time. I've changed the config value to reflect current amount and I'll fix it properly (take value of last found block as estimate) later
As for the shares - it is true, that the round info graph compares your rate to pool rate (which is you + rest of the pool) and this does not make that much sense for a pie (or round or similar) graph. I've fixed the round info graph to compare you vs. rest of the pool.
Does not work very well for coins where the block reward changes gradually in time. I've changed the config value to reflect current amount and I'll fix it properly (take value of last found block as estimate) later
As for the shares - it is true, that the round info graph compares your rate to pool rate (which is you + rest of the pool) and this does not make that much sense for a pie (or round or similar) graph. I've fixed the round info graph to compare you vs. rest of the pool.
In case any of you are being scared by the ridiculously low value of Cache right now, don't be. It's pure and simple market manipulation by someone with a bot to drive prices down so they can gain lots of Cache, to presumably, one day, pump the hell out of it.
DON'T SELL
On another note, I bought a few hundred straight from Cryptsy's sell orders
DON'T SELL
On another note, I bought a few hundred straight from Cryptsy's sell orders
Tried your setting, but didn rise a lot. Vendor is Gigabyte. I have about 29-30kh/s per card and rather 31 with 1140 gpuclock. (instead of 1050 by now)
Same settings, but only 75% of the performance
singula,
Sorry for bugging again, too much time on my hands as I'm sitting by your pool's dashboard
I was noticing that the Dashboard > Round Information graph, appears to show not the total of shares from all pool members (making the circle represent 100% of shares), but instead, the total shares from all pool members + own worker shares (making the circle represent more than 100% of shares). To put this in other words, let's say I have submitted 500 valid shares, and other members have submitted 1000 valid shares. The pool section of the graph will show 1500 shares, and my worker section another 500 (for an incorrect total of 2000 instead of 1500).
The payout *estimates* are also incorrect, and I'm thinking that it is the same "error" that's causing them to be generally lower than I'd expect. Most importantly, payout is correct - I just noticed this on the latest block found - where my estimate was off (low), but the payout was correct (higher than the estimate).
I really don't mind at all, it's purely cosmetic at this point. Just had to keep myself busy a couple of minutes (hours?!) while we wait for the next block to be found!
Cheers,
~ Myagui
Sorry for bugging again, too much time on my hands as I'm sitting by your pool's dashboard
I was noticing that the Dashboard > Round Information graph, appears to show not the total of shares from all pool members (making the circle represent 100% of shares), but instead, the total shares from all pool members + own worker shares (making the circle represent more than 100% of shares). To put this in other words, let's say I have submitted 500 valid shares, and other members have submitted 1000 valid shares. The pool section of the graph will show 1500 shares, and my worker section another 500 (for an incorrect total of 2000 instead of 1500).
The payout *estimates* are also incorrect, and I'm thinking that it is the same "error" that's causing them to be generally lower than I'd expect. Most importantly, payout is correct - I just noticed this on the latest block found - where my estimate was off (low), but the payout was correct (higher than the estimate).
I really don't mind at all, it's purely cosmetic at this point. Just had to keep myself busy a couple of minutes (hours?!) while we wait for the next block to be found!
Cheers,
~ Myagui
anybody with optimum settings for the 290x , please share
Tried your setting, but didn rise a lot. Vendor is Gigabyte. I have about 29-30kh/s per card and rather 31 with 1140 gpuclock. (instead of 1050 by now)
No R9 280X there
I'm getting 39~40kh/s with my R9 280x with these settings.
Code:
cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -I 11 -g 2 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 16384 --lookup-gap 2
GFX card set to 1140/1500.
No R9 280X there
I am not getting any accepts here. My hashrate is 10% from yesterday oO.
Is it already time for cpu mining?
Is it already time for cpu mining?
Same algorithm (scrypt jane), higher nfactor (14 instead of 12), another coin:
http://yacoinwiki.tk/index.php?title=Mining_Hardware_Comparison
Mining with GPU is still more profitable than CPU mining with some cards, although I guess at NF 15 the situation will change probably in favor of CPU (GPU having probably still better hashrate but maybe no longer hasrate per watt)
So not (yet) time for CPU mining (that may com at nfactor 15, or maybe even higher). Time to tune up the parameters
Well, you can try using settings for Nfactor 14 (some another coin, but also scrypt-jane):
http://yacoinwiki.tk/index.php?title=Mining_Hardware_Comparison
In the ATI/AMD section there are some benchmarks with used parameters ....
Not sure if it'll be better, but you can try using these as a stable baseline and try tweaking params from those values in order to maybe get a better hashrate.
http://yacoinwiki.tk/index.php?title=Mining_Hardware_Comparison
In the ATI/AMD section there are some benchmarks with used parameters ....
Not sure if it'll be better, but you can try using these as a stable baseline and try tweaking params from those values in order to maybe get a better hashrate.
Slow death of CACH Oo, some1 sold 3600 CACH on cryptsy Oo
I'm choosing to read:
Strong trading of CACH Oo, some1 just bought cheap 3600 CACH on craptsy Oo
Happy Mining
~ Myagui
boy was that read wrong... why is it tanking so hard ?
Jump to: