Topic: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" - page 251. (Read 1151252 times)
November 15, 2015, 04:03:49 AM
This message was too old and has been purged
November 15, 2015, 04:03:06 AM
Why not implement said Doogcoin alongside Clam on JD, instead of in its place? Kind of like Alex's site where you can gamble a few different crypto's with one common trollbox, etc?
I just spent a few hours away from the computer thinking about things, and came to the same conclusion myself. There's no reason to switch from CLAM to the new coin when we can accept both at the same time. That way people get to lose their balance twice!The Just-Dice codebase isn't set up to handle multiple currencies, but I can simply run two different instances like I did with the original Just-Dice and Doge-Dice sites.
Discussing Just-Dice, in the context of JD as a CLAM service, is "on-topic" in my opinion.
Considering some of the ideas and 'snapshot' dooglus has mentioned, this is certainly so.
November 15, 2015, 03:56:24 AM
Why not implement said Doogcoin alongside Clam on JD, instead of in its place? Kind of like Alex's site where you can gamble a few different crypto's with one common trollbox, etc?
I just spent a few hours away from the computer thinking about things, and came to the same conclusion myself. There's no reason to switch from CLAM to the new coin when we can accept both at the same time. That way people get to lose their balance twice!
The Just-Dice codebase isn't set up to handle multiple currencies, but I can simply run two different instances like I did with the original Just-Dice and Doge-Dice sites.
I am a big supporter of this idea although I was scolded when I mentioned this before as being off topic. Do we need to take this to another thread before I start asking about details?
November 15, 2015, 03:11:01 AM
Quote from: link=topic=623147.msg12976674#msg12976674 date=1447550269
It has been suggested on the Just-Dice chat that I shouldn't even be talking about this stuff, because it is causing the price of CLAM to drop. 
You don't say...
November 15, 2015, 01:43:25 AM
Ops
thanks. 
November 15, 2015, 01:39:11 AM
November 15, 2015, 12:33:43 AM
I have 1500 Clams and bought them at 0.008 BTC, when do you think the price baking to the price ?
Gamble on JD or take your losses and count your blessing in my opinion.
AD HOMINEM ATTACK DELETED
Be sure to vote on what your thoughts are to the Community Clamcoin account "SuperCLAM": https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
"I don't care it is just a shitcoin" is currently in the lead with 12 votes. (thanks assholes
) (another one of my post deleted... makes 3 tonight)Sensory me bb I luvs it.
Want to respond to my post about you keeping the altcoin shit out of here with your mighty CLAM CEO hammer?
Perhaps you could type a list of rules for us sheeple to follow? Also, be sure it's all in Latin so we all understand it please.
November 15, 2015, 12:12:26 AM
I have 1500 Clams and bought them at 0.008 BTC, when do you think the price baking to the price ?
Gamble on JD or take your losses and count your blessing in my opinion.
AD HOMINEM ATTACK DELETED
Be sure to vote on what your thoughts are to the Community Clamcoin account "SuperCLAM": https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
"I don't care it is just a shitcoin" is currently in the lead with 12 votes. (thanks assholes
) November 14, 2015, 11:53:52 PM
Personal attacks have no place here.
Neither does altcoin chat that has nothing to do with CLAM.
If that "xxxxcoin" shit didn't come up here then uvwvj wouldn't have posted that here. Perhaps doing the base rules for everyone would prevent the bullshit.
November 14, 2015, 11:49:12 PM
Blah Blah Blah
CLAM pussies
Blah Blah Blah
doogcoin
Blah Blah Blah
clamscammers
Blah Blah Blah
Deleted due to ad hominem(personal) attacks.CLAM pussies
Blah Blah Blah
doogcoin
Blah Blah Blah
clamscammers
Blah Blah Blah
More reason we need a vote on who sensors the thread. Not that uvwvj's presence is exactly wanted by me either. He falls into the same category as Dooglus to me atm.
This is the problem with fear mongering out of extreme fears (someone posting a bad wallet sniffing client) because it's the little shit that actually causes the pointed guns to fire.
This has nothing do with "censoring".
Now, more than ever, it is important that the thread is available for on-topic discussion.
Personal attacks have no place here.
Deleting your quote, as well.
November 14, 2015, 11:10:46 PM
Blah Blah Blah
CLAM pussies
Blah Blah Blah
doogcoin
Blah Blah Blah
clamscammers
Blah Blah Blah
CLAM pussies
Blah Blah Blah
doogcoin
Blah Blah Blah
clamscammers
Blah Blah Blah
Deleted due to ad hominem(personal) attacks.
November 14, 2015, 10:37:46 PM
Hi i would like to exchange my clams to your btc offer me your price. 
I bought them earlier this morning between 2 kilos and more for $0.87
Haha joking
I bought them earlier this morning between 2 kilos and more for $0.87
Haha joking
November 14, 2015, 10:09:05 PM
Forgive me if I'm not reading this correctly but if you do a 1 for 1 swap at block 730k the digger would still possibly have 500+k coins as you do not know what he's doing with them once they move to polo or jd.
See a couple of posts up - I wasn't considering a "swap" at all.
I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain.
And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
It's perfect. Do it
Aye ! Shitcoin shill !
Doogie has fucked the digger out of 62% of his/her instamine !! Your vast misfortune has been saved ! WTfreakinGOOOO !
That is until the next time you must travel across The Sea of TheForkWillFuckYouNess.
And since Doooogie insists on jumbling our posts into a single convoluted mess..
snipped from : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12975664
-->
<--
Soooo PERFECT ! November 14, 2015, 09:52:20 PM
Please remember to vote on if you think the SuperClam community account should have elections to see who controls it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
I agree with BAC. Present account holders are totalitarian, arbitrary, disrespectful, smug.
New account holders needed - someone level-headed, mature, stable, rational. I nominate BAC and Hippie Tech.
har har.
I respectfully decline your nomination.
November 14, 2015, 09:47:25 PM
Please remember to vote on if you think the SuperClam community account should have elections to see who controls it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
I agree with BAC. Present account holders are totalitarian, arbitrary, disrespectful, smug.
New account holders needed - someone level-headed, mature, stable, rational. I nominate BAC and Hippie Tech.
November 14, 2015, 09:41:17 PM
Please remember to vote on if you think the SuperClam community account should have elections to see who controls it:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12721665
Right now the majority says yes... which I happen to agree with. Because it does seem like a public community position.
I doubt voting means much to "these" folks unless they agree with what's being voted on & if the vote goes how "they" like. But still... VOTE!
November 14, 2015, 09:40:33 PM
But when people not know what the owner of jd will do then less will buy it and more people will sell it. I just want a desicion made what jd will do.
A couple of pages ago, Dooglus said "I can say that I won't stop Just-Dice accepting CLAM for as long as the site continues to pay for its expenses.". Is that what you're looking for?
And if new coin, maybe people will move to new coin , and clam dice maybe wont pay for its expenses.
November 14, 2015, 09:33:12 PM
But when people not know what the owner of jd will do then less will buy it and more people will sell it. I just want a desicion made what jd will do.
A couple of pages ago, Dooglus said "I can say that I won't stop Just-Dice accepting CLAM for as long as the site continues to pay for its expenses.". Is that what you're looking for?
November 14, 2015, 09:15:07 PM
I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain.
And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
I like this idea. Then the current rules of CLAM don't change and everyone can change who wants to use the new coin. But the exchange rate of CLAM might drop, because people would assume that some people might cash out to BTC for easy money doubling.And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
If we vote based on how many CLAMs we hold, would be nice if investors at JD could vote, too.
What about who buy clam in the future they will not get the "new coin". Most people wont buy anything if not what will happen
They can buy whichever coin they want, or both of them, assuming either or both coins still have a market in the future. That is never guaranteed with any coin.
I know people can buy whatever they want. But why buy clams that can be change out with other coin. Everyone knows clam value is based on jd. What jd does decide future clam value. But when people not know what the owner of jd will do then less will buy it and more people will sell it. I just want a desicion made what jd will do. Not all this back and forth. Its just meaningless making it more even uncertian about what will happen in the future.
November 14, 2015, 09:06:34 PM
I was considering having the initial distribution of the new coin be such that everyone has the same as the amount of already-moved CLAM they had at that block. Coins which hadn't moved since the initial CLAM distribution wouldn't feature in the new coin's blockchain.
And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
I like this idea. Then the current rules of CLAM don't change and everyone can change who wants to use the new coin. But the exchange rate of CLAM might drop, because people would assume that some people might cash out to BTC for easy money doubling.And so "the digger" would only have the 38% of his 500k that he moved already, and the next generation of large diggers would have nothing.
The idea being that since some people want digging to stop and others want it left alone, we need a 2nd coin in which digging has stopped.
For those who want digging left as it started, there's CLAM. For people who want it stopped, there's the other coin.
Again, it's just an idea someone brought up. So far I've heard nothing against it other than that "it's a bad idea". But is it? And if so, why so?
If we vote based on how many CLAMs we hold, would be nice if investors at JD could vote, too.
What about who buy clam in the future they will not get the "new coin". Most people wont buy anything if not what will happen
They can buy whichever coin they want, or both of them, assuming either or both coins still have a market in the future. That is never guaranteed with any coin.
Jump to: