Topic: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" - page 362. (Read 1151252 times)

There seems to be some situations where a -rescan doesn't take place appropriately after an import.

Please try running with -rescan.

Hello Clam people.

Enjoy my Clam Space Shuttle launch video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvakTtUeYyc


(edit)

If you enjoyed, tip clams here: xAhAwb5TE5kYN8JGv6K5B4KonroYoLEXK8

Thanks!

Nice! I've never seen http://clam.makejar.com/

Good idea and great solve media spot.

Sent a 1 CLAM tip http://khashier.com/tx/91dd2be9dad42bf61c7397a9d1821a3ab3b414f6b75a6ff714483def1079d962

Great job!

Thank you for replys guys. But I already did it.

Step by step.

1. I have address 14zZ22SgYaLX54viNM5V4JGhfmccydq2EQ. I check here: http://clam.makejar.com/ site writes that this address has CLAM.

2. I check my bitcoin wallet with "listaddressgroupings", to shure that I really am the owner of address:



3. I export my bitcoin wallet to bitcoin.dat

4. I open CLAM client. 1.4.7. Full updated.



Clear wallet. With only one address:



5. I import my wallet to CLAM:



I write password:



6. And i get many new addresses:



And NO CLAMS!



I can not understand what the problem is

Please help.

Not that I'm aware of either.

It is needed though, but needs to be quality shit.

Not much competition in the poker/crypto world atm... doors wide open! I hear the new SWC has issues ect.

Good time to pick up a lot of free customers.

Discussion and ideas; I am not aware of a full-fledged project underway for Poker.

Someone has plans for clam poker?

Nice!!!  Thanks!!!

You need to sync at least some of the blockchain before your CLAM will show up.

Your example 14zZ22 address was funded in block 5949, for example. You won't see its 4.6 CLAM in your wallet until you have synced up to block 5949. All initial distribution coins were funded by block 9262, so once you've synced that many you will see all your CLAM in your wallet.

To speed up syncing, check out my bootstrap.dat post.

I auctioned Just-Dice userid 666 "for charity". The highest bid was 80 CLAM, but then KLYE bid 6.66 CLAM and the highest bidder dropped out to "let KLYE have it".

I had KLYE send the 6.66 to the Crypto for Kids address.

I'm sad to see that he's now auctioning the same account again, when your charity could have had the whole 80 CLAM. Maybe he'll send you at least part of his proceeds.

Just a quick note to whoever donated 6.66 Clam to Crypto for Kids!  THANKS!!!

Hoping this fall to make a nice donation in the name of Clam users to the hospital!!

Keep up the great work!!!

If Dooglas or SuperClam would like to loan the wallet enough CLAM to make staking worth while it would be appreciated!!!

you have to "import" your btc wallet to the clam client for you to claim your clams

From the clam client goto "file" then "import wallet"...

Just do yourself a favor and move any btc, ltc, doge from the wallet you are going to import. Also before doing any import make a backup and import the backup wallet.. you can call it 1btcwallet.dat and import it....

and if I can do it,,, anyone can ...

Hi,

I whant to try CLAM, but i have a problem. I checked my btc addresses at CLAM Checker here: http://clam.makejar.com/ And site writes that any of my addresses have CLAM. For exemple 14zZ22SgYaLX54viNM5V4JGhfmccydq2EQ. Then I downloaded CLAM client 1.4.10 from this topic, imported my wallet. And now I have many CLAM adresses but NO CLAM coins

Where did I go wrong?





 

CLAM future chart predictions:

We reached block 400k, and I updated the bootstrap file:

Looking to trade some gold and silver coins for CLAMS.

1oz gold coin & 1/2 oz gold coin.

Thank you.

Obviously, CLAM is an open source project - we are not a legal team - and this shouldn't be construed as legal advice.

This is a legitimate concern and has been talked about extensively on the BTC Dev Mailing list and elsewhere.
As far as I am aware, there is no agreed upon solution - though I have read a couple proposals to limit culpability (such as storing the block data in encrypted form).

I think there are also additional concerns fundamental to a distributed system such as Bitcoin or CLAM.
For instance, theoretically one could be argued to assist in money laundering or financing of criminal activity simply by being involved in relaying, storing, and honoring a consensus which includes an offending transaction.

I take moral and idealistic issue with that interpretation, but I think it is a valid concern and attack.
Further, some of the legal precedent surrounding ISP's seems to suggest at least some protection in cases where the content is not in the control or feasibly removed by the intermediary.

As abhorrent and unacceptable as the content may be, I personally wonder about the implications of censoring content in a network such as Bitcoin or CLAM.  Who decides what is "legal"/"acceptable" and "illegal"/"unacceptable", and by the standards of what jurisdiction?

I think there are a wealth of unanswered questions; even in cases of tort, ISP's, and vanilla copyright infringement - which have even been legislated in some jurisdictions, such as the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act.  Some protections have been extended by these acts/laws, and yet there seems to be disagreement in my reading as to the exact interpretation of even this protection/liability.

---

Probably not helpful.
Likely more questions than answers.
It seems even concerning laws which were intended to clarify rights/responsibilities there is disagreement to the exact repercussions.

I think everyone would be interested to hear any thoughts or research anyone else (possibly more informed) has come across?

---

Edit:
Additional, possibly interesting reading material, concerning liability of ISP's in the U.S. - Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act

Ha!

Here's what happened...

I was talking to Poloniex this morning about how they were still spending far too much on CLAM transaction fees. It turned out that the root cause was that they were using a very old version of the CLAM client, from before I fixed settxfee.

I was wanting to check whether they were using a more reasonable fee now, but I have no good way of finding their transactions. The best way I've found is to look for large deposits to Just-Dice, because they almost always come from Poloniex. It just so happened that the first large deposit I looked at had some My Little Pony CLAMspeech...

I'd figured i'd give JD a month trial with the leverage, see how it stacks up. If in the end it makes more than solo staking then i will keep my coins in JD. It was a good experiment for a month though. As for copyrighted text, i doubt many people from Hasbro will care all that much but i've been wrong before. Given the level of copyrighted films, music etc i would imagine that would be a copyrighter's first priority over anything else.

   Doog,  You need to get another hobby.  I guess JD, Deb and all the bunny's don't take up enough time.  Your still out reading the block chain....