Topic: [ANN][CLOAK] Private, Secure, Untraceable & Decentralized Digital Currency - page 192. (Read 811071 times)

not a bad idea just need to get more people on board this volume is lowwwww

I tell you what I think I can do to help cloak and many others in this thread can do for very cheap as well. For the foreseeable future I will be sending all minting rewards to the development fund. Also I will be sending them via enigma so that even the people new to cloak and can see and be rewarded in running the node. First I think this will help in a small way for development until a better solution is implemented. But second and more importantly, all the new people with their wallets open looking for rewards this will encourage them to stay on. People need to see enigma in action and its rewards. I ask everyone in this thread with some staking rewards to send them from now on to the donation address through enigma. Go Cloak

Neither am I and I'll bet I have way more than he does...  

i'm not                         

I dont think so. Why do you think you'll "have a turn"

People forgot about cloak and now im just an angry bagholder.

Fresh starts are iffy. Ripple had a falling out with one of their main devs and he started Stellar, but it took years. Both have different philosophies.

Ripple plays the game at hand. Stellar went non-profit. Both are centralized organizations.

Shadowcash, which I understand absorbed some of the early Cloakcoin devs, is trying a new route with a shopping network. A black-market. Witness as Shadowcash loses ground. I don't give a crap about a shopping network. I want a private coin -- functional money -- and I will decide where I will spend it.

The reason, IMO, cryptocurrencies work is because, generally, all the currency on earth is public manipulated crap. You are manipulated.

I used to like AEON and Monero, but is PoW really any good? By itself? Huge slow blockchains? Dinosaurs that don't yet know the asteroid is coming? The last gasp?

Even Gavin Andresen, if memory serves, felt that a PoW/PoS solution was a good idea. Early on, Cloak was PoW.

A name change, IMO, if the Cloakcoin Devs decided, should only be that. Let the code be. Skip the ICO's and taxes.

It's not about labels. It's about trust. Trust brings customers. Customers bring cash. Cash rewards the Devs and the improvements (updates) should then come naturally.

I like what one of the Cloakcoin Devs said. Even a bad reputation is better than no reputation.

Sorry for being so "positive" about Cloakcoin today, but I call them like I see them. In the past, I've made a few bucks predicting. We'll see what happens this time.

Actually, let me re-amend that too $1 per coin.

This may be a good idea. Just Cloak

Personally I think a fresh start is a good idea, aslong as the time frame to do this isn't too long. Cloakcoin then to be exchanged to the new fresh start which IMHO should be just called "Cloak", drop the coin as it's been said many of times, it's unnecessary. Add a bonus for those who transfer cloakcoin to cloak, to support the original community.

I suggest updating the website to a paid/or customised wordpress theme which is clean, effective and attractive. Aswell as trying to buying something like cloak.org or something, with the ICO funds.

Cloakcoin has alot of potential, but personally I think it's just lingering from a revival which only has a low pulse.

If you do go ahead with a fresh start, please do make sure the original cloakcoin community don't get burnt for less than 50cents per coin.
  

My Easter Pep Talk...

Bittrex trade has been dropping over the last 24 hours, but prices are stabilizing -- and Livecoin trades are edging up.

If people were to do their homework; compare Cloakcoin to all of the others pulling down more trades, they might be pleasantly surprised.

I would love to see this coin jet up to number 7 on coinmarketcap.com. In the 300,000,000 USD or EUR range. On par with DASH prices.

If that happened, the gravitation would be difficult to resist. DASH Masternodes would probably begin to jump ship. Not to mention other investors and pumpers.

The GUI wallet functions fine for me. I've only been up for a few days, but actually PoS mine more coin than I did with PoW coins, as a small investor. And no machines buzzing away sucking down power. No configuring miners etc.

I had Cloak in the past, but sold them all. I'm beginning to think that was a big mistake now.

I had DASH when it was cheap. Sold out before the big pump. I felt that DASH had issues, too centralized, enforced bag holding (masternodes), a pre-mine, and a founder who had a questionable background.

I'll be buying in some more Cloak, gradually. Running my decentralized node.

come on cloak make it 10$ price

But also I think, if the code will be published but Cloak not appears at Polo it will be not good.
So, the first, we have to secure some guarantees from Poloniex about this movement.

[/quote]

totally agree

yes they only accept coins with open code which is fine, there are plans to go open source sometime this year. when that time comes cloak will take the next step forward from there.

How do you think Cloakcoin faster bocomes popular with Poloniex support or without it?
I think for now the fast way is the right way.

And much more better is to know the developers and read the public code ))

But also I think, if the code will be published but Cloak not appears at Polo it will be not good.
So, the first, we have to secure some guarantees from Poloniex about this movement.

 Poloniex only accepts open source
I think

@gri0

If Poloniex only accepts open source, then there might be a problem. If Cloakcoin becomes popular, which I think it will, Poloniex will lose out. Greed will bring them calling.

I'm not sure where I read it, but there was discussion about allowing some Cloakcoin source out, but obfuscating the critical parts.

Ultimately, even if Cloakcoin declines to publicize its code, they must like the bankers of old, earn the trust of their depositors. In that sense, posting their photographs online speaks volumes.

Monero has one public spokesman -- Ricardo -- but has now opened its code, as I understand it. And yet, Monero can change that code. There are also ways to remove "keys" from the code -- create very hard to find back doors etc.

So one critical issue is "trust."

If Cloakcoin decides to keep their code proprietary and we know the developers, I thinks it's far better than publicizing the code and not knowing the developers, i.e., Monero.

poloniex exchange ok cloak need but not must need just look PIVX all volume coming from bittrex and look the chart where it was and now where is it by price just in 1 month and cloak really so stable from many months i think now need real price for cloak and once again i want to tell cloak need poloniex but not must need and one more question if cloak open source in future then poloniex said we will add cloak after open source? i think no and about 90% chance after open source cloak will not added on poloniex because cloak was not added from at first when cloak came on crypto market

Sure. And all we need to be accepted by Poloniex is open the source, right?
So, if the sources of Cloak will be opened, is it bad for Cloak because someone can use the Enigma technology for their own coin?
Or this is a good, because the source code can be subject to additional audit and trust in Cloak will grows up?

it's just a matter of time, we'll have our turn  ...in the meantime, "buy low"     

@banano -

Obviously Bill Still was excited about Quark for awhile, based on the Still video you referenced.

And Quark was popular and like many cryptocoins, they did pump for awhile.

In the video I mentioned about Cloakcoin, Still did not pump the coin. Neither did "Joe." They talked about bitcoin primarily.

About the "Shill Bill" video you referenced. It is long and unprofessional. Sure there is propaganda and political noise. Most already know that the media is full of it. It has been that way for "thousands" of years.

Interesting about Alex Jones. But that he predicted the twin towers destruction by terrorists, since everyone on earth already knew the towers were a target, is also propaganda. Conspiracy theories. Taking pieces of TV shows, putting them altogether? Come on. Total bunk. Any kid with a 3rd grade education can see that.

Even comparing "Shill Bill" to "Bill Still" is nonsense. Still is just a self style reporter. Gives his gut feelings. People can see that.

Alex Jones is a quack -- most of the time. People can see that too.

But the world, as "Shill Bill" would have you believe, is not controlled by the "Jews" or the "Elite" as Adolf Hitler would have agreed. And we know what Hitler did.

Cloakcoin is not propaganda either. It's just appears to me to be another good shot. Will it last long term? Who knows?

Could Cloakcoin pump? Sure. Like bitcoin, Litecoin or even DASH.

I would like to be here if and when it does pump.