http://www.dashnation.com/opinion/amanda-b-johnson-on-bitcoin-uncensored-a-rebuttal/
#DashNation #IoM
I just want to say that the very last point on the collateral of Masternodes, not being at stake to be lost, has nothing to do with how they secure the network. The Number one reason for the collateral is so that no one person can own a majority of Masternodes period. Because of this, any Masternode trying to secure a double spend, or pass on any malicious thing, will be rejected by the network. Statistics of what it would take to, say, gain control (and it would require complete control) of a quorum to manipulate transactions or gather information, are astronomical.
The argument implies that MN owners are trusted to do the right thing to protect their investment. This wouldn't be true if you had the goal of destroying Dash at any cost. What is true is that at astronomical cost, you still couldn't destroy Dash.