Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 1111. (Read 9723748 times)

Hi all.
I think the community must play a well-organized team.
Each of us has to create a buy order at the price of 0.013 BTC on poloniex.
Together we can build a great wall, then the course will unfold.  

Aaaaand It's Gone  

Though it had a nibble out of my 0.0134 bids  

Edit, Opps it's just out of range at 0.015 I see

Maybe he want cheaper dash?

Don`t worry Steff I made the same mistake Anyway good opportunities to buy dash for anyone who bought btc before its ride up.

Oh dear, you're quite right, I missed that!  LOL, only buys there!  Excuse my sloppiness once again, I beg ya'all   

Nice screenhot...^^

It`s not him, look twice on the photo.



Do you see My open orders?

25k sell wall ... and it seems like its not otoh, so we have another whale joining the game?

I just sat down and saw this gigantic wall, and thought WTF?  And my first thought was it must be you, LOL Not you!

Second thought was that it looks like "the wall" from Game of Thrones, LOL

This is to purchase the actual hardware wallets so that we can actually do the acceptance build and acceptance testing of the delivered software from the previous proposals. This hardware will be needed for the coming months and years for acceptance testing of all future Electrum wallet releases.

Yes is winning, we have similar proposal?

Nice article about Node40 on Bitcoinist! 

Node40 Announces New Price Points For Dash Masternode Hosting

For all your masternode hosting needs!

I just wanted to add some food for thought on these proposals... in past proposals, and in this one, I have seen many posts to the effect of "we already are integrated with x, why do we need another? Isn't one integration 'enough' to provide the functionality?". In my opinion, that line of thinking is very linear / limited. I posted this in response, pointing out the multitude of strategic benefits (with some enhancements to the list):
1) We get "free marketing" with every integration when these companies email their registered users and / or previous orders mailing lists with the announcement of Dash support. These are potentially new users who are already cryptocurrency users.
2) We get a news-worthy event with which we can approach publications and increase our exposure
3) We get something for our PR firm to highlight in conversations they are having and in press releases
4) We build our network of partners in the Bitcoin ecosystem, not only the companies themselves, but they can facilitate introductions, or simply create higher awareness of Dash among their users, business partners, investors, employees (who change jobs within the industry, by the way), management teams, and business advisors
5) We demonstrate the value of working with Dash to our other developing relationships and gain a reputation in the industry of being great to work with.

Is one or two wallet providers "enough" in terms of providing a product to our users? Sure. But when you consider the full value of these relationships, it's a "no-brainer" to me. I encourage everyone to start thinking very strategically about these opportunities, instead of just evaluating the "immediately obvious" functional or technical benefits. Lift your eyes to the bigger picture. If there is a credible industry player willing to work with us on a project and we have the resources available, our strong bias should be to engage with them as often as possible. I promise that the intangible benefits far outweigh the minuscule costs associated with these proposals.

Let's make a SWOT analysis for Dash

https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/lets-make-swot-analysis-for-dash.9095/

It sounds like you could have missed one payment. Nodes get skipped or get double payments about 0.6% of the time on average. Since the time between payments was about two payment cycles, this is probably what happened to you. It's a tiny little "lottery" built into the code, so it just sounds like you were extremely unlucky.

Thanks but I don't use this app to check my payments. I can see this long break between the last two payments on the blockchain.

Previous 2016-05-23 next 2016-06-03.

Nothing to worry, just want to show others this COULD happen in exceptional cases.

did you talk to rango about this ?

I am well aware of that. Why would I tell someone else that my nodes are OK and ignore his own issues? Please read what I actually wrote:


Naturally this applies to everyone using the app. Not just me.

I think he was talking about his own MN