-snip-
Yah, I'm still "discussing" it because I still think it's immensely important that we should support them. Just my point of view and if I could convince someone, great.
Well I just thought I would contribute since I have a slightly more practical position in this kind of thing. In my case I am more interested in knowing if a project manager is going to fund the expenses he has without selling the Dash in exchanges, something like Shapeshift still means selling it in exchanges. That is the key for me at this stage, if someone is going to pay for all of their server expenses with their own FIAT and is just looking keep the Dash then that is the key for me, as that project manager is for all intents and purposes providing the OTC liquidity for his own project.
That is for example a requirement for any official spending we have done so far, not a single coin sold in an exchange is our goal.
Having said this, this is just a priority for me at this point in time, as the system grows and there is more liquidity then that wont matter as much. But we cant forget that the network just gives us tokens and the ecosystem is not mature enough to just support direct spending of Dash without us being careful about it.
The good news is that we can take on a project of any size as long as we can also find an sponsor that is willing to support it and keep the Dash for himself to run nodes and pay for the expenses. That is the whole reason behind our OTC program, and if a 3rd party service that is really important for Dash offers that type of reassurance I would be more inclined to support it. Just my personal view.