Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2214. (Read 9723926 times)
May 07, 2015, 09:30:34 AM
here we go...
May 07, 2015, 09:29:45 AM
So it means ABSTAIN counts as NAY.
It seems that ABSTAIN would only count as a NAY if you don't reach 51% within the allotted time (2 weeks).
I'm assuming the 51% counts for either YEA or NAY.
May 07, 2015, 09:29:23 AM
....
Hey Voter,
Welcome.
What a great first post for someone new around here
May 07, 2015, 09:29:14 AM
Does this mean that Dash version 0.11.2.23 will include the automatic backup function and will also include all fixes & additions incorporated into the Master branche on github after 11th of april 2015 (when Dash version 0.11.2.22 was released) ? If so we need perhaps a bit more documentation about this update.
i do not think that is in there
this is only for the voting system , as not mandatory update
i just downloaded version 0.11.2.23 and automatic backups are definetely in there, therefore we should have more information
about this new update as it implements more than only the voting revision.
For example this new update installs a backup folder and creates a backup file automatically upon start of wallet (see Tools, Show Automatic Backups)
Right now the only documentation is here:
- General usage: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/306
- Additional info for multiple-wallet-users: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/317
- Backups are only done when the wallet is started. Starting a daemon (dashd) does not create backups
I'm about half a planet away from my development box at the moment, but when I'm back home I'll write some official documentation.
thanks, appreciate it
May 07, 2015, 09:27:57 AM
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results.
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN
EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct.
Let me get this straight.
51% Yea is required to pass.
However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass.
Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain?
Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers?
Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most.
"Voting will begin immediately and be open for 2 weeks. We will consider the vote successful if at any time we have 51% of the masternodes support."
https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825
So it means ABSTAIN counts as NAY.
Well, get off your backsides and vote (actually, get on your backsides, turn on your pc and vote
) 
May 07, 2015, 09:23:27 AM
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
Your MN does not need to be upgraded. Only the QT needs to be at .23. If you have more than one masternode listed in your local masternode.conf file, use masternode vote-many yea
Thanks, I was looking at the single MN command and not the many. All is well, voted.
May 07, 2015, 09:20:23 AM
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results.
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN
EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct.
Let me get this straight.
51% Yea is required to pass.
However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass.
Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain?
Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers?
Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most.
"Voting will begin immediately and be open for 2 weeks. We will consider the vote successful if at any time we have 51% of the masternodes support."
https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825
So it means ABSTAIN counts as NAY.
May 07, 2015, 09:19:43 AM
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
Your MN does not need to be upgraded. Only the QT needs to be at .23. If you have more than one masternode listed in your local masternode.conf file, use masternode vote-many yea
May 07, 2015, 09:17:42 AM
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results.
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN
EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct.
Let me get this straight.
51% Yea is required to pass.
However, 1872 Abstain? That means no pass.
Or, are we saying 1872 have yet to vote because vote starts with default set to abstain?
Or, are we saying 51% yea votes vs. nay votes, ignoring abstainers?
Sorry, only got one brain cell, and its thinking about the one thing it likes to think about most.
May 07, 2015, 09:15:53 AM
RE: Voting. Right now I'm set to abstain. How do I participate in a vote?
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
[Wallet = v0.11.2.23, MN on v0.11.2.22) Do the NNs need to be upgraded to 23?
the vote command returns:
Error upon calling SetKey
the list vote command works just fine but looks like everyone is set to abstain. (masternode list votes)
May 07, 2015, 09:15:10 AM
10 % ?? masternode vote nay
Sorry that I find too much.
Just think of all that funded development you can just port over to your clone.
Sorry I would take your criticisms more seriously if you were contributing to the code not just cloning.
And you won't say it's too much if you come up with something amazing that requires funding and said funding gets approved.
To compete in the global leagues without having to give in to seed funding it's a drop in the ocean.
Is just my opinion. And our code also has differences. e.g. QT Paperwallet, 5 min BlockTime, static reward.
May 07, 2015, 09:04:43 AM
Damn. I just moved my buys down. Missed that dump by just a few minutes.
Someone's just desperate to need money now or it's a pre-dump announcement.
I hate to say it but I think DASH will go much lower today. Hopefully I'm wrong.
May 07, 2015, 09:01:39 AM
10 % ?? masternode vote nay
Sorry that I find too much.
Just think of all that funded development you can just port over to your clone.
Sorry I would take your criticisms more seriously if you were contributing to the code not just cloning.
And you won't say it's too much if you come up with something amazing that requires funding and said funding gets approved.
To compete in the global leagues without having to give in to seed funding it's a drop in the ocean.
May 07, 2015, 08:59:42 AM
Damn. I just moved my buys down. Missed that dump by just a few minutes.
May 07, 2015, 08:57:47 AM
May 07, 2015, 08:53:27 AM
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
You can follow me on twitter. I'll continue to post updates throughout the day. https://twitter.com/Node_40
Currently:
Yea: 156
Nay: 13
According to the rules, "This vote requires 51% of the masternodes to success"
https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825
There are, currently, 2509 MNs, as http://178.254.18.153/~pub/Darkcoin/masternode_payments_stats.html registers.
So, to be approved, the proposal will demand about 1,280 YEA votes....
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
This must be checked.
10 % ?? masternode vote nay
Sorry that I find too much.
May 07, 2015, 08:40:05 AM
Exactly this way. And I'm in sync.
I had a couple of different terminal windows open and was querying the daemon that wasn't updated.
May 07, 2015, 08:39:31 AM
Can someone (that had upgrade to .23) give us here the status of the vote (don't have access to my MN at the moment).
You can follow me on twitter. I'll continue to post updates throughout the day. https://twitter.com/Node_40
Currently:
Yea: 156
Nay: 13
According to the rules, "This vote requires 51% of the masternodes to success"
http://oi59.tinypic.com/2ikyslk.jpg
https://dashtalk.org/threads/vote-self-sustainable-decentralized-governance-by-blockchain.4825
There are, currently, 2509 MNs, as http://178.254.18.153/~pub/Darkcoin/masternode_payments_stats.html registers.
So, to be approved, the proposal will demand about 1,280 YEA votes....
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
This must be checked.
May 07, 2015, 08:34:48 AM
Exactly this way. And I'm in sync.
May 07, 2015, 08:33:13 AM
I get different results:
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
YEA: 606
NAY: 5
ABSTAIN: 1872
Interesting. How are you checking results.
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c YEA
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c NAY
dashd masternode list votes | grep -c ABSTAIN
EDIT: My daemon wasn't updated. Your results were correct.
Jump to: