Dash is not "undefined" and Evan does have huge plans.
As vertoe says, Dash is competition for Paypal, not Bitcoin.
The market doesn't like this plan, so the price of Dash will tend toward zero.
It's a bad idea to invest in a coin with a permanent centralized point of 3rd party failure, AKA Reference Node.
God, scraping for any last microscopically plausible arguments heh
? How sad... Now, the reference node is the source of all evil... wow ...
Remember when you were bitching about how Darsend was closed source and how evil Evan was because of it, you ding-dong? Then what happened? Ah...
It's called "necessary development roadmap" - the spork - which is exactly what permits this currency to innovate so damn fast and with such monumental leaps in technology. And it has zero power to subvert the protocol. It is not permanent at all, as it was Dasrksend being closed-source was never a permanent deal.
What vertoe says has zero value, given the unethical manner in which he left. Angry, in tantrum with retaliatory actions. Talented as he may be, his has lost absolutely any credit and credibility in his say about Dash. Only trolls find legitimacy because it serves your purpose.
vertoe only came back and dished dirt because toknormal was talking shit. You say "unethical tantrums." I say whistle-blowing.
otherwise she left with a (disappointing) minimum of drama. 'So long and thanks for all the fish' is an amicable way to part, especially in altcoin land.
I get that the 100% completely centralized MasterMasterNode is in theory "not permanent." My beef is that it decentralizing it was characterized as a "not impossible" task, despite no demonstrated propensity for such an event to ever occur.
We all know the Reference Node is here to stay. It's not going away, so you must spin that fact as A Good Thing.
That's fine, but please don't insult us by spinning tales of unicorns and decentralized MasterMasterNodes.
See, despite being a know troll, this sort of post is almost a fruitful discussion, that I why I am quoting.
you DO present valid arguments, so I will respond without troll-pesticide.
First of all, quit talking about vertoe if you don't know that facts. There was zero whistle-blowing, whatever vertoe says is purely 100% his own opinon. There is absolutely no hard evidence, only speculation, coming from a MAN (not a woman) who became disenamoured (to say the least) with this project. Again, provide fact, not conjecture.
How can you say its impossible, when Evan has been nailing all impossibilites one by one? The reference node is not here to stay, but there has NEVER been a schedule for it to disappear. It a fabulous tool that does NOT WORK like you suggest. It is NOT a central point of failure. If that node goes down, the network does not go down, only the impossibility to spork back in case of a client update and subsequent network fork. So please do stop the FUD.
There is no "demonstrated propensities of such an event to occur" - quite simply because there are bigger fish to fry. Period. Since the reference node causes absolutely no risk to the network in case of failure (except at the time of a major update) - I can only classify your drama as FUD.
