Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 2419. (Read 9723787 times)

No, DASH is closing down because AdamWhite's parents posted a message to stop DASH people teasing him.  

Apparently it's affecting his school work and playtime.

We all decided the right thing to do is respect Adam, close down DASH and let him get his way so he can get back on track at school.

No, DASH is closing down because AdamWhite's parents posted a message to stop DASH people teasing him.  

Apparently it's affecting his school work and playtime.

We all decided the right thing to do is respect Adam, close down DASH and let him get his way so he can get back on track at school.

no.

i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.

the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.

i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.

if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?

good luck

I don't see my MN on Drk.mn but when I grep my IP it says it's enabled. Is it working or do I need to fix it somehow?

I don't see my MN on Drk.mn but when I grep my IP it says it's enabled. Is it working or do I need to fix it somehow?

************ Dash Release Update : 11.2.17 ************************

- Fixed the "locking up" issue that would cause masternodes to go offline and general instability
- Masternode list changes - Udjin
- Better icon images - Crowning
- Improved Chinese Translation

https://www.dashpay.io/downloads/

no.

i left because i disagree darkcoin or however it will be called next year is not a decentralized entity. it never was but i ignored it as long as darkcoin was following the same path i was following. the path to total financial privacy. and thats why i am so upset about how this currency is lead by a single person. darkcoin is like an old conservative company with strong hierarchical comamnd structures and a single person on the top of the pyramid. evan duffield. the rebranding using a detergent name was just a step forward in creating something like apple or paypal. fuck this i tell you. what we need is a trustless, decentralized and anonymous currency. darkcoin is not decentralized as it still relies on a single person. and this reaches deep into the code base.

the core devs were just a bunch of volunteers exploited for the big thing. the extended darkcoin team was the same with even a lower place to sit on that pyramid. and what was the darkcoin foundation again? right, something to reserve some rights on some names and collect money. who nominated and voted for the foundation board? who does even know who are these guys? how did we learn about the foundation? from local news papers! the team listings kept counting names of people nobody ever noticed before. and they never committed anything visible to the community or the repository. and i was spending 25 hours a day monitory everything that happened in the darkcoin community for more than a year. the things going on here are fishy, intransparent and rely on a single entity.

i will get out and and will contribute to something decentralized and anonymous. i always hoped darkcoin could fill that void. i cant blame anyone to stay with this project. you are probably investors trying to win a gold donkey. or you are simply trying to exploit every possible vector of profit in the coins space. whatever. you are not here because darkcoin is something it claims to be.

if you disagree with my statement above, i dont care, but answer that simple question: what if evan duffield suddenly announces he quits the project tomorrow morning?

good luck

watch the video yet?

Technically we'll be called DoRK

Technically we'll be called DoRK

What?

We are going back to being called DRK on Saturday.

Hi Gang!  Back at the desk!  Anything new to report?

Hi Gang!  Back at the desk!  Anything new to report?

We can add avatars to our account here. Isn't that wonderful?

btw https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10959734

Hi Gang!  Back at the desk!  Anything new to report?