http://junseth.com/post/112626834687/stop-talking-about-confirmation-speeds-start
Dark Coin was built, originally, to solve the anonymity problem. Now they introduced what they think is a fix to confirmation times. And yet, it has a fraction of the hashing power being pumped into it.
All of bitcoins hashing is from 1 pool so how is petahashs any better than gigahashes of mining in keeping the network stable, and also the decentralized masternode system should keep the network doublely stable as an extra network layer, or am I missing something?
That 'tweet' (ugh, I feel my IQ slipping 50 points just typing that word) was hilarious. The idiot was actually boasting about how many terawatts of wasted energy goes into confirming BTC's 'quasi-optimal' - I assume he means, 'glacially fucking slow' - transactions as BTC miners all thrash away on the same few pools. Not that Darkcoin is any better in that respect, but hey, Darkcoin's mempool IX's courtesy of Masternodes are already far more secure than BTC's centralised ASIC PoW will ever be.
All that's needed for Darkcoin to be taken seriously security-wise is moving to pure Proof of Service.
Imagine blockchain security being wholly the preserve of a random 20 blinded Masternodes each block... as secure from meddling as Darksend is going to be secure from transaction snooping.