Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3212. (Read 9723858 times)

I believe it can only spike to a low price but not actually stay there. There are people who cashed BTCs from $600-$1000 range and would gladly buy "a few" back at 10-15x discount - to repeat what they've done in the past. The thing with cheap coins is that it doesn't need much money to sweep the offers.

The 1-hour BTC/USD MACD is turning positive again. Selling momentum is slowing. As time goes on it will start to get increasingly riskier to dump

(Unless you're CITIbank holding a million coins that accumulated over 3 years for precisely this purpose - to toxify the Bitcoin market for mainstream investors just as the ETF is about to get rubber stamped).


I sure would be. It didn't even crash that far after the big April 2013 runup to 266 and since then there is a world of infrastructure been developed and invested in - ATMs, BTMs, derivatives, wallets, ETFs you name it. I can't possibly see it going back there in anything but a flash crash.

like I said... I would not be surprised if bitcoin ended up between $50 and $74....

They appear to have been in fiat overnight and have woken up shocked that it's not yet in the sub-100 range and are now in buy back mode.

So much for the idea that the "number of Bitcoin users fewer than members of Kuwait airways frequent flyers club" and that bitcoin is insignificant and not going anywhere......http://insidebitcoins.com/news/russia-blacklists-bitcoin-websites/28688

Yes. We must be 


I don't know about that - it's not really significant that there are few "mineable's" in the to p10 marketcap. I think that's more because of the diversifying market than because of a "dying algo".

All the same, if you were right, mineable coins can just fork themselves and switch to POS.

Yes... every 2-3 days(or pages) somebody speak about LTC
When i ask about x11 ASIC many people spoke against me and told me to leave thread because here I could only speak of darkcoin
X11 is darkcoin algo!
We must be reasonable, and take advantage of the problems that have been most ancient coins to correct those failures.
If you look at the top 10 market cap you will see that the only minable coin there is Litecoin(Doge is merged and his reward is finished in a few months), and is dying.
The traditional mining is dying and must avoid affecting darkcoin.
(Sorry for my english)

Charles Lee, is that you? Why you speak no English good?  

p.s. Dude, there is nothing FUD about it. Charts don't lie.

Why do you call it "fud" ?

It was a lighthearted market-trend observation.

At worst satire.

Why this fud against Litecoin, do you want your users?
Litecoin has a problem that also suffer darkcoin, the sell-produced by asic, is working to prevent this in the future?
EDIT: I dont like LTC, its a no-dev coin and asic are killing him

Probably roughly the same as any other day. 

Sucks to be waking up in Washington DC, right now. It is 8AM now. I am curious how many suicides and heart attacks and panic attacks we will have today  

Buy buy buy darkcoin ;-)

https://www.litebit.eu/coin/drk/en/

Indeed.

The only thing is that Nubits has a bit of an ugly pegging mechanism whereas Bitshares has a very elegant one. (I say that as a 'scammed' investor in Bitbay which uses the Nubits approach. I'm still hoping Bitbay might get somewhere).

The thing I like about Bitshares is that it simultaneously offers two distinct types of investor exactly what they need in a complimentary way. The commercial world which is looking for a stable currency will buy the bit asset (e.g. BitUSD) meanwhile the risk-seeking investment sector buys the underlying collateral (Bitshares / BTS). The more adoption of the pegged asset there is, the more value is gained by the collateral (BTS). The less adoption less BTS value, but the whole time the Bit asset remains pegged even though the BTS collateral valuation varies.

There's also no limit to volume as their is with the Nubits approach - in fact the more BitUSD is adopted the higher the value of BTS goes. This model therefore stimulates BOTH supply and demand at the same time.

The  NuBits model on the other hand only concerns itself with throttling supply in the hope that there will be enough prevailing demand to make the price rise. It's a one-dimensional model as opposed to the more holistic BitShares approach. You're basically just volume for value as opposed to creating an asset which the market naturally pegs through the interplay between those two distinct trading groups I described above.

I just decided to sit the whole thing out. I wasted enough time last year on crypto-trading and probably gave myself a few more grey hairs than I needed to at the same time.

I've been a fiat-free zone for about a year and a half now.

To be attached to US dollar nowadays is not a good idea in my opinion.... 


The U.S. debt has surpassed $18.0 trillion and continues to grow with no signs of remission. In fact, it has more than doubled in the past 10 years, growing at an annual rate of 8.82%. In 2018, just four years from now, it is expected to exceed $22.0 trillion.

There is also nubits, pegged to usd.

I do not like that dark is falling along with bitcoins. Weren't dark suppose to not be linked to btc, but every time btc falls so does drk a little.

Beautiful, looks very interesting, thanks.
Wish darkcoin had this stability.

They have. Its called Bitshares. (Or more specifically, the associated BitAssets such as BitUSD).

It's the most innovative and interesting concept in crypto (although not a new concept in finance generally) since POW in my opinion.

Yes I was preparing this too but you were faster Tok
Hard for somebody who bought btc at higher stakes or even on top holding it... LOL
Don`t know how about you but I`ll put buy order all way down