[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3235.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: TaoOfSaatoshi on January 09, 2015, 07:46:51 PM

Bitcoin Rush exclusive Darkcoin episode coming January 18th!

A preview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue9UQP2kGH8

Hey Tao, can we get a tip address going? I can do it if ya'all want me to? I think Bitcoin Rush has outdid himself and has worked so hard on this episode, he deserves a nice big fat tip. Only, he takes BTC, not alts, and I don't know about you all, but I only have DRK and I think it might be easier to get tips tipped in DRK?? What do you all think?

Also, if any of you can tip Bitcoin Rush, he deserves it Wink

Thanks! Address is in the above youtube post

KryptoFoo

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Quote from: vertoe on January 10, 2015, 01:41:09 PM

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

I agree and I oppose any of evans comments about using v11 on main net.

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:39:20 AM

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

V11 is in a state where it's releasable, the final stage of testing is to have some of the main network begin to update and report back. It actually gives us a much lower risk of breaking something when we do it this way. It's not any of the devs though, but I support it if it's just for testing.

please, read your PMs or at least the testing thread on dct Roll Eyes

why bothering going main net if not everything is working on testnet still?

and, recent v10 is broken too, we have to look into the address versions again (not sure what went wrong there), see onyx v3 thread on dct.

Vertoe put together a very well organized list of open items here https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-22#post-35996. The open items appear to only affect end user experience. My only concern is that if there was significant code changes in v11 there may be unknown unknowns lurking. No nothing can stop folks from running v11 on mainnet, but it doesn't hurt to have more time on testnet right? Ideally the dev team should be discouraging everyone from using v11 on mainnet until the main UX issues are resolved on testnet. Saying it is OK to use it now - a kind of defacto release notice - is confusing to us readers who are eager to use the latest and greatest versions of stuff and who may feel they lose some advantage by not updating immediately and before everyone else. And maybe no harm done if we do, but what's the rush. Would be nice to have a fully functional mostly bug free UX before devs start saying it is OK to upgrade.

eahmadov

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: tungfa on January 10, 2015, 11:21:20 AM

10.17.26 Onyx V3 - All Users

Source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin
Windows .exe: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-win.zip
Mac OSX: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-osx.dmg
Linux: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-linux.tar.gz

10.17.25/26
- Fixed bugs with Start-many
- Fixed an issue where clients might not be able to validate a block and get stuck

~~MAC Link is working now !~~
Tx Evan
Grin

New Mac wallet is experiencing problem with addresses. Please don't install it yet. Wait for a fix. Somebody posted that in DCT: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/onyx-v3-10-17.3141/page-7

vertoe

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 505

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

I agree and I oppose any of evans comments about using v11 on main net.

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:39:20 AM

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

V11 is in a state where it's releasable, the final stage of testing is to have some of the main network begin to update and report back. It actually gives us a much lower risk of breaking something when we do it this way. It's not any of the devs though, but I support it if it's just for testing.

please, read your PMs or at least the testing thread on dct Roll Eyes

why bothering going main net if not everything is working on testnet still?

and, recent v10 is broken too, we have to look into the address versions again (not sure what went wrong there), see onyx v3 thread on dct.

vertoe

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 505

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 10:22:24 AM

Quote from: vertoe on January 10, 2015, 09:34:03 AM

HEADS UP!

Version 0.10.17.25 changes the public address of your multisignature holdings! The private keys and redeemscripts are untouched and you can still access your funds without any problems. You just might wish to regenerate the script to update the public key to recieve funds! Multisignature addresses start with '7' now. (Example.)

This is a backported feature from the upcoming 0.11 release. Join testing.

Hey Vertoe,
What to you mean exactly by "regenerate the script to update the public key to recieve funds" ??
Which script? (a patential script that use multisig? if we don't use multi sig : nothing change? and this imply no impact on MN?)

Edit : and the version is 25 or 26? Roll Eyes

it's 25. and its affecting main network. and if you dont know what i'm talking about, you are pretty fine (only affects multisig).

GhostPlayer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: RenegadeMan on January 10, 2015, 12:42:02 PM

Same here! On most projects I work on if code was introduced into a production environment prior to its passing through formal SIT (systems integration testing) and UAT (user acceptance testing) there'd be a big red flag go up and a rollback would have to be instigated to maintain various certification levels. All very serious by comparison. Once DRK's beyond this beta stage and a 1.x system I'd expect something pretty similar.

Understandable, but does that apply to the open source world where anyone is able to compile their own code, or closed-source in-house dev?
If its on Ghub there is no way to prevent anyone from doing it anyways or even write their own code.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: Libertario on January 10, 2015, 12:56:52 PM

Official: Etherum start on March; IBM adopt etherum-blockchain technology.

When a "darkchain"? It's good for smartcontract! Wink

I'm guessing they are forking it for their "internet of things" blockchain plans rather than currency purposes.

Libertario

member

Activity: 118

Merit: 10

Official: Etherum start on March; IBM adopt etherum-blockchain technology.

When a "darkchain"? It's good for smartcontract! Wink

RenegadeMan

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 12:07:35 PM

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:45:32 AM

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:35:15 AM

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on January 10, 2015, 11:03:36 AM

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 11:00:43 AM

Quote from: splawik21 on January 10, 2015, 10:49:34 AM

Quote from: innergy on January 10, 2015, 10:42:11 AM

0.11.0.4 on mainnet?
https://drk.mn/

impossible. I`ve seen that, probably monitoring have some issue.

There is often a MN with advance version.
Should be for testing purpose (Evan's or Flare's node)

Quote from: eduffield@darkcointalk

v0.11.0.4

This version has everything and works on mainnet.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-20#post-35889

v11 works on mainnet and if you want to help testing, you could run it too. Just make sure you compile from source and run it in a debugger. (The protocol is backwards compatible so separate releases can survive side-by-side together)

Of course, Evan knows the true risks. I can't say I agree with it though.

It's essentially zero risk.

Fair enough Ed. Apologies for sounding terse and assuming it was testing by devs. Obviously you can't stop people using test releases on main net if they want to. I work in environments with full on release management and obviously not the freedom of open source so tend to be on a hair trigger with this kind of thing!

Same here! On most projects I work on if code was introduced into a production environment prior to its passing through formal SIT (systems integration testing) and UAT (user acceptance testing) there'd be a big red flag go up and a rollback would have to be instigated to maintain various certification levels. All very serious by comparison. Once DRK's beyond this beta stage and a 1.x system I'd expect something pretty similar.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:45:32 AM

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:35:15 AM

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on January 10, 2015, 11:03:36 AM

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 11:00:43 AM

Quote from: splawik21 on January 10, 2015, 10:49:34 AM

Quote from: innergy on January 10, 2015, 10:42:11 AM

0.11.0.4 on mainnet?
https://drk.mn/

impossible. I`ve seen that, probably monitoring have some issue.

There is often a MN with advance version.
Should be for testing purpose (Evan's or Flare's node)

Quote from: eduffield@darkcointalk

v0.11.0.4

This version has everything and works on mainnet.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-20#post-35889

v11 works on mainnet and if you want to help testing, you could run it too. Just make sure you compile from source and run it in a debugger. (The protocol is backwards compatible so separate releases can survive side-by-side together)

Of course, Evan knows the true risks. I can't say I agree with it though.

It's essentially zero risk.

Fair enough Ed. Apologies for sounding terse and assuming it was testing by devs. Obviously you can't stop people using test releases on main net if they want to. I work in environments with full on release management and obviously not the freedom of open source so tend to be on a hair trigger with this kind of thing!

BiteMyShinyMetalAss

hero member

Activity: 617

Merit: 509

Crypto Card - https://platinum.crypto.com/r/28cz7d

DRK is amazing! Developers - even more! Soon DRK will be the cardinal Richelieu to the Bitcoin! LTC is like a patient in severe coma, each day new organ fails, soon it will be done...

GilAlexander

member

Activity: 68

Merit: 10

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

An unstable release can't put the network at risk - just because onyone can build his own 'evil' client in a way he wants and that isn't a way to exploit the good decentralised cryptonetwork.

qwizzie

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1245

maybe we should make a formal announcement on all forums that v0.11.0.4 is since today available to test on
Mainnet and that any feedback is appreciated ? And point them to the binaries as well...
Just make sure they all know its for test purposes.

Jestah

sr. member

Activity: 426

Merit: 250

Quote from: tungfa on January 10, 2015, 11:21:20 AM

10.17.26 Onyx V3 - All Users

Source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin
Windows .exe: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-win.zip
Mac OSX: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-osx.dmg
Linux: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-linux.tar.gz

10.17.25/26
- Fixed bugs with Start-many
- Fixed an issue where clients might not be able to validate a block and get stuck

MAC Link is working now !
Tx Evan
Grin

It's telling me it's v10.17.25 in the qt debug window when I downloaded 10.17.26....

eduffield

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:35:15 AM

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on January 10, 2015, 11:03:36 AM

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 11:00:43 AM

Quote from: splawik21 on January 10, 2015, 10:49:34 AM

Quote from: innergy on January 10, 2015, 10:42:11 AM

0.11.0.4 on mainnet?
https://drk.mn/

impossible. I`ve seen that, probably monitoring have some issue.

There is often a MN with advance version.
Should be for testing purpose (Evan's or Flare's node)

Quote from: eduffield@darkcointalk

v0.11.0.4

This version has everything and works on mainnet.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-20#post-35889

v11 works on mainnet and if you want to help testing, you could run it too. Just make sure you compile from source and run it in a debugger. (The protocol is backwards compatible so separate releases can survive side-by-side together)

Of course, Evan knows the true risks. I can't say I agree with it though.

It's essentially zero risk.

eduffield

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Quote from: stonehedge on January 10, 2015, 11:33:37 AM

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

V11 is in a state where it's releasable, the final stage of testing is to have some of the main network begin to update and report back. It actually gives us a much lower risk of breaking something when we do it this way. It's not any of the devs though, but I support it if it's just for testing.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

Quote from: eduffield on January 10, 2015, 11:16:42 AM

Quote from: thelonecrouton on January 10, 2015, 11:03:36 AM

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 11:00:43 AM

Quote from: splawik21 on January 10, 2015, 10:49:34 AM

Quote from: innergy on January 10, 2015, 10:42:11 AM

0.11.0.4 on mainnet?
https://drk.mn/

impossible. I`ve seen that, probably monitoring have some issue.

There is often a MN with advance version.
Should be for testing purpose (Evan's or Flare's node)

Quote from: eduffield@darkcointalk

v0.11.0.4

This version has everything and works on mainnet.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-20#post-35889

v11 works on mainnet and if you want to help testing, you could run it too. Just make sure you compile from source and run it in a debugger. (The protocol is backwards compatible so separate releases can survive side-by-side together)

Of course, Evan knows the true risks. I can't say I agree with it though.

stonehedge

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1002

Decentralize Everything

An unstable release on main net is unacceptable in my view. Testnet should be scaled up rather than put the network at risk. If this is testing by the devs, it makes me wonder why I pay FIAT to subsidise a portion of testnet to avoid exactly this sort of thing.

tungfa

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1023

10.17.26 Onyx V3 - All Users

Source: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin
Windows .exe: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-win.zip
Mac OSX: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-osx.dmg
Linux: https://github.com/darkcoinproject/darkcoin-binaries/raw/master/darkcoin-0.10.17.26-linux.tar.gz

10.17.25/26
- Fixed bugs with Start-many
- Fixed an issue where clients might not be able to validate a block and get stuck

MAC Link is working now !
Tx Evan
Grin

eduffield

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1036

Dash Developer

Quote from: thelonecrouton on January 10, 2015, 11:03:36 AM

Quote from: Lebubar on January 10, 2015, 11:00:43 AM

Quote from: splawik21 on January 10, 2015, 10:49:34 AM

Quote from: innergy on January 10, 2015, 10:42:11 AM

0.11.0.4 on mainnet?
https://drk.mn/

impossible. I`ve seen that, probably monitoring have some issue.

There is often a MN with advance version.
Should be for testing purpose (Evan's or Flare's node)

Quote from: eduffield@darkcointalk

v0.11.0.4

This version has everything and works on mainnet.

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-0-x-testing.3401/page-20#post-35889

v11 works on mainnet and if you want to help testing, you could run it too. Just make sure you compile from source and run it in a debugger. (The protocol is backwards compatible so separate releases can survive side-by-side together)

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3235. (Read 9723814 times)