[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3337.

turk-fx

full member

Activity: 216

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: turk-fx on December 15, 2014, 12:35:58 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Always looking for individuals to start the next MN

If you're Interested, please send e-mail to

[email protected]

When sending e-mail, ask any questions

The website is not finalized just yet but you can visit: www.unitedmasternode.com

Working in 100DRK shares
and 1DRK to get started per 100DRK for Escrow and Server fee(s)

Looking forward to hearing from you
Mangled Blue

It is good to offer tgis service, but fees seems to be high. If you take 1drk for 100drk , the owner of that 100drk only be making .7 dark a month average. Which seens to be too low until masternodes payment reach to 60%.

Making statements like this without knowing what is actually happening is irresponsible to say the least.
Maybe some of my current clients will chime in.
And they can let you know how I am ripping people off with high fee's.

I hardly think that $1.10 to $2.00 in escrow fee a month is a high fee
and
Flare's fee of approx $0.90 per 100DRK for the server is high

Well, i just got 2MN setup with flare which cost around 7.5DRK. So it is 3.75 drk ech. And if you add 1drk for 100drk , it comes up to close 14drk a month for whole 1000drk block. Considering .57drk average payment, 1000drk will return 17drk a month and eachso each 100 share will get back .7drk - I am not calling anything or saying that your are a bad person. But at that point, it is not appealing to be a art of masternode. I am entitled to have my opinion and I know what is actually hapenning.

tungfa

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1023

Quote from: tungfa on December 15, 2014, 07:54:09 AM

Bitcoinist News Bits 15th Dec.
DRK 3 min 10 sec ....>
Grin

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC854riaGH45TVlxptI18v4w

Bump .....Dinner and some news ? ....>

tungfa

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1023

Quote from: jiggytom on December 15, 2014, 10:34:57 PM

Quote from: nomad13666 on December 15, 2014, 10:10:54 PM

Quote from: oblox on December 15, 2014, 05:21:42 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 05:10:44 PM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on December 15, 2014, 05:02:14 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 04:56:02 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Tens of bugs and vulnerabilities have been found in prior reviews. It will take some more time (and more eyes) to make it bulletproof.

Personally I think the whole Masternode payment system should be replaced by another cleaner system that works at the protocol level. No enforcement or centralization would be necessary, while eliminating forking risk.

Perhaps the spreadcoin dev might want to have a go at such a system.

Cleaner?? protocol level? What centralisation? Whats clean about thousands of clients going on and off every second while trying to maintain rounds of anonymity? That would juts cause mayhem. What is unclean about blind nodes with 100% uptime? And what about PoService?

I dont get it.

I don't remember when you got on board, but prior to the semi-voluntary scheme of payments with enforcement threat, there was a direction of mandatory payments (100%) with no enforcement needed whatsoever. Unfortunately it caused forks in the production environment so then we got to a situation where some people were calling for no hard forks, others were in favor to get the job done - even if it includes a few more problematic forks as a byproduct etc etc. Then we got the spork and the rest is history.

It hasn't been forgone. Evan and Patrick were talking about ways to utilize the blockchain in terms of deciding where payment goes. The reference nodes are the intermediary step until the best course of action is decided to have consensus without forks. It certainly isn't off the table.

Supercoin dev has recently released Supercoin's code as open source...

http://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin-p2p

Maybe Darkcoin devs can implement Supercoin's trust-less, multi-signature, anonymous technology into Darksend?

I'm not a coder, so I have no idea if this is possible, but theoretically it kinda makes sense to me, so I thought I'd throw it out there...

SuperSend works great btw...(SuperSend = no nodes)

"Supercoin is a new X11 crypto coin, it has many new, original or advanced features." OR? Huh

I read enough haha.

Super WHAT !
i think you are in the wrong Thread !!
Cool

JGCMiner

hero member

Activity: 611

Merit: 500

Quote from: Minotaur26 on December 15, 2014, 10:14:30 PM

It looks like everyone wants their 15min of fame.

Yeah. This really starting to get silly.

jiggytom

legendary

Activity: 1068

Merit: 1020

Quote from: nomad13666 on December 15, 2014, 10:10:54 PM

Quote from: oblox on December 15, 2014, 05:21:42 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 05:10:44 PM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on December 15, 2014, 05:02:14 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 04:56:02 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Tens of bugs and vulnerabilities have been found in prior reviews. It will take some more time (and more eyes) to make it bulletproof.

Personally I think the whole Masternode payment system should be replaced by another cleaner system that works at the protocol level. No enforcement or centralization would be necessary, while eliminating forking risk.

Perhaps the spreadcoin dev might want to have a go at such a system.

Cleaner?? protocol level? What centralisation? Whats clean about thousands of clients going on and off every second while trying to maintain rounds of anonymity? That would juts cause mayhem. What is unclean about blind nodes with 100% uptime? And what about PoService?

I dont get it.

I don't remember when you got on board, but prior to the semi-voluntary scheme of payments with enforcement threat, there was a direction of mandatory payments (100%) with no enforcement needed whatsoever. Unfortunately it caused forks in the production environment so then we got to a situation where some people were calling for no hard forks, others were in favor to get the job done - even if it includes a few more problematic forks as a byproduct etc etc. Then we got the spork and the rest is history.

It hasn't been forgone. Evan and Patrick were talking about ways to utilize the blockchain in terms of deciding where payment goes. The reference nodes are the intermediary step until the best course of action is decided to have consensus without forks. It certainly isn't off the table.

Supercoin dev has recently released Supercoin's code as open source...

http://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin-p2p

Maybe Darkcoin devs can implement Supercoin's trust-less, multi-signature, anonymous technology into Darksend?

I'm not a coder, so I have no idea if this is possible, but theoretically it kinda makes sense to me, so I thought I'd throw it out there...

SuperSend works great btw...(SuperSend = no nodes)

"Supercoin is a new X11 crypto coin, it has many new, original or advanced features." OR? Huh

I read enough haha.

Minotaur26

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

It looks like everyone wants their 15min of fame.

nomad13666

legendary

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Quote from: oblox on December 15, 2014, 05:21:42 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 05:10:44 PM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on December 15, 2014, 05:02:14 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 04:56:02 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Tens of bugs and vulnerabilities have been found in prior reviews. It will take some more time (and more eyes) to make it bulletproof.

Personally I think the whole Masternode payment system should be replaced by another cleaner system that works at the protocol level. No enforcement or centralization would be necessary, while eliminating forking risk.

Perhaps the spreadcoin dev might want to have a go at such a system.

Cleaner?? protocol level? What centralisation? Whats clean about thousands of clients going on and off every second while trying to maintain rounds of anonymity? That would juts cause mayhem. What is unclean about blind nodes with 100% uptime? And what about PoService?

I dont get it.

I don't remember when you got on board, but prior to the semi-voluntary scheme of payments with enforcement threat, there was a direction of mandatory payments (100%) with no enforcement needed whatsoever. Unfortunately it caused forks in the production environment so then we got to a situation where some people were calling for no hard forks, others were in favor to get the job done - even if it includes a few more problematic forks as a byproduct etc etc. Then we got the spork and the rest is history.

It hasn't been forgone. Evan and Patrick were talking about ways to utilize the blockchain in terms of deciding where payment goes. The reference nodes are the intermediary step until the best course of action is decided to have consensus without forks. It certainly isn't off the table.

Supercoin dev has recently released Supercoin's code as open source...

http://github.com/supercoinproject/supercoin-p2p

Maybe Darkcoin devs can implement Supercoin's trust-less, multi-signature, anonymous technology into Darksend?

I'm not a coder, so I have no idea if this is possible, but theoretically it kinda makes sense to me, so I thought I'd throw it out there...

SuperSend works great btw...(SuperSend = no nodes)

raico

member

Activity: 115

Merit: 10

Quote from: thelonecrouton on December 15, 2014, 08:39:50 PM

Quote from: raico on December 15, 2014, 08:20:04 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Hi spreadnodes, i don't know what's your people do when someone find out some bugs. There is no need to sarcasm here. In fact, it's encouraged to do so in the Darkcoin Community and It's what OpenSource meaning: A better Darkcoin Project.

The bugs, no matter how critical as Aswan had posted in the DCT that occurred in the protocol level or just some variables setting, they are not mean Darkcoin Project is worse than any other crypto currency. It is just the opposite that the Darkcoin Project is more and more close to perfect, and ready for actual use.

So, i'm appreciate the people that provide the bugs to our great Dev-team to fix. The community appreciate the people who contribute their private time to the Darkcoin Project.

spreadnodes is either just a daft kiddie or a deliberate provocateur, either way he (or she) shouldn't be taken seriously.

More devs, more users, more supporters of the Darkcoin code and economic model is only going to benefit Darkcoin.

You are right, man~

splawik21

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1005

DASH is the future of crypto payments!

Quote from: MyFarm on December 15, 2014, 08:38:37 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

As a large investor in both Spreadcoin and Darkcoin, please stop. You're not helping anyone or anything.

Thank you.

Thnx MyFarm at least you understad it.
Indeed we are cordial to spread dev.

MyFarm

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Propulsion on December 15, 2014, 04:50:44 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

What's with all these "Spread" accounts now? Even Mr. Spread sounds belligerent. Not a good way to make a first impression gentlemen.

The Spreadnode account is uncalled for. But my suggestion would be to be cordial with Mr. Spread.

thelonecrouton

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1000

Quote from: raico on December 15, 2014, 08:20:04 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Hi spreadnodes, i don't know what's your people do when someone find out some bugs. There is no need to sarcasm here. In fact, it's encouraged to do so in the Darkcoin Community and It's what OpenSource meaning: A better Darkcoin Project.

The bugs, no matter how critical as Aswan had posted in the DCT that occurred in the protocol level or just some variables setting, they are not mean Darkcoin Project is worse than any other crypto currency. It is just the opposite that the Darkcoin Project is more and more close to perfect, and ready for actual use.

So, i'm appreciate the people that provide the bugs to our great Dev-team to fix. The community appreciate the people who contribute their private time to the Darkcoin Project.

spreadnodes is either just a daft kiddie or a deliberate provocateur, either way he (or she) shouldn't be taken seriously.

More devs, more users, more supporters of the Darkcoin code and economic model is only going to benefit Darkcoin.

MyFarm

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 1000

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

As a large investor in both Spreadcoin and Darkcoin, please stop. You're not helping anyone or anything.

Thank you.

splawik21

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1005

DASH is the future of crypto payments!

Quote from: Kai Proctor on December 15, 2014, 08:25:39 PM

"Spread" that's an interesting name for a coin... at least the future holders are warned. Grin

Come on

Good that the ppl look at the code and find the inperfections but there is no need to act like a peacock, anyway take your time for a pump.

oaxaca

hero member

Activity: 671

Merit: 500

Public Service Announcement
---------------------------------

Until thepiratebay comes back to life, this site looks adequate:

https://oldpiratebay.org/

Code:

P.S. We are NOT asking for any kind of donation! Please, don’t send your money
to any people pretending they are from Isohunt! These are pure scammers that want
to get easy bucks from you!

Kai Proctor

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

01100100 01100001 01110011 01101000

"Spread" that's an interesting name for a coin... at least the future holders are warned. Grin

raico

member

Activity: 115

Merit: 10

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Hi spreadnodes, i don't know what's your people do when someone find out some bugs. There is no need to sarcasm here. In fact, it's encouraged to do so in the Darkcoin Community and It's what OpenSource meaning: A better Darkcoin Project.

The bugs, no matter how critical as Aswan had posted in the DCT that occurred in the protocol level or just some variables setting, they are not mean Darkcoin Project is worse than any other crypto currency. It is just the opposite that the Darkcoin Project is more and more close to perfect, and ready for actual use.

So, i'm appreciate the people that provide the bugs to our great Dev-team to fix. The community appreciate the people who contribute their private time to the Darkcoin Project.

Ignition75

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

www.dashpay.io

Quote from: Propulsion on December 15, 2014, 04:50:44 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

What's with all these "Spread" accounts now? Even Mr. Spread sounds belligerent. Not a good way to make a first impression gentlemen.

Agreed, in the politest way possible, GTFO...

GhostPlayer

legendary

Activity: 1092

Merit: 1000

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 05:10:44 PM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on December 15, 2014, 05:02:14 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 04:56:02 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Tens of bugs and vulnerabilities have been found in prior reviews. It will take some more time (and more eyes) to make it bulletproof.

Personally I think the whole Masternode payment system should be replaced by another cleaner system that works at the protocol level. No enforcement or centralization would be necessary, while eliminating forking risk.

Perhaps the spreadcoin dev might want to have a go at such a system.

Cleaner?? protocol level? What centralisation? Whats clean about thousands of clients going on and off every second while trying to maintain rounds of anonymity? That would juts cause mayhem. What is unclean about blind nodes with 100% uptime? And what about PoService?

I dont get it.

I don't remember when you got on board, but prior to the semi-voluntary scheme of payments with enforcement threat, there was a direction of mandatory payments (100%) with no enforcement needed whatsoever. Unfortunately it caused forks in the production environment so then we got to a situation where some people were calling for no hard forks, others were in favor to get the job done - even if it includes a few more problematic forks as a byproduct etc etc. Then we got the spork and the rest is history.

There was NEVER a semi-voluntary scheme of payment. There was, on the other hand, a friendly suggestion to update clients to follow the development roadmap.

See, you've got your facts wrong. RC2, RC3 and RC5 and RC5 were all hard forks, which went wrong due lack of network reconciliation. Twice reconciliation was well underway, but Evan decided (quite responsibly) to pull the plug for the sake of taking a step back and making the code more resilient. Then the spork was invented, and yes, the rest was history. With every "blow", DRK gained exponential development. Necessity is the mother of invention.

And then we found evidence of foul play by some pools (which shall not be named). Pools are centralised, not MN's.

Decentralisation increases with each new MN going online.

semajjames

hero member

Activity: 528

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: TaoOfSaatoshi on December 14, 2014, 09:21:41 PM

Quote from: e1ghtSpace on December 14, 2014, 08:36:45 PM

Don't forget to thank Mr. Spread for discovering the bug!

Thank you Mr. Spread for discovering the bug! Fixed. Grin

+++1

thank's Mr Spread good to have you around

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 05:10:44 PM

Quote from: GhostPlayer on December 15, 2014, 05:02:14 PM

Quote from: AlexGR on December 15, 2014, 04:56:02 PM

Quote from: spreadnodes on December 15, 2014, 04:46:41 PM

darkcoin finally getting real code review.

Tens of bugs and vulnerabilities have been found in prior reviews. It will take some more time (and more eyes) to make it bulletproof.

Personally I think the whole Masternode payment system should be replaced by another cleaner system that works at the protocol level. No enforcement or centralization would be necessary, while eliminating forking risk.

Perhaps the spreadcoin dev might want to have a go at such a system.

Cleaner?? protocol level? What centralisation? Whats clean about thousands of clients going on and off every second while trying to maintain rounds of anonymity? That would juts cause mayhem. What is unclean about blind nodes with 100% uptime? And what about PoService?

I dont get it.

I don't remember when you got on board, but prior to the semi-voluntary scheme of payments with enforcement threat, there was a direction of mandatory payments (100%) with no enforcement needed whatsoever. Unfortunately it caused forks in the production environment so then we got to a situation where some people were calling for no hard forks, others were in favor to get the job done - even if it includes a few more problematic forks as a byproduct etc etc. Then we got the spork and the rest is history.

It hasn't been forgone. Evan and Patrick were talking about ways to utilize the blockchain in terms of deciding where payment goes. The reference nodes are the intermediary step until the best course of action is decided to have consensus without forks. It certainly isn't off the table.

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 3337. (Read 9723768 times)