I've read every post and response on this. I can understand your concern wozzek23 but I do think you're failing to comprehend some of the key aspects of Darkcoin's economic architecture. You're speaking and hypothesising from the basis of a notion that coins are "rapidly disappearing" because of their use in MN's. As has been pointed out, they're not "locked up", they're simply reserved for the MN they're associated with. They can be removed from that situation and in back in circulation within seconds, so in essence they've never been taken out of circulation. There's a balance between people selling their DRK for gain and people holding their DRK for potential greater gain and/or MN income. The various pressures/forces involved keep things in relative order. When adoptions starts approaching something more akin to prime time, we'll see the MN numbers rise and fall as people make their own interpretations of risk/reward. I think the economic architecture is pretty sound.
I think you're also getting strung up on whole amounts of DRK versus DRK divided down into it's 8 decimal places. As per Tao's tweet just now, Darkcoin will eventually consist of a total of 21,000,000,000,000,000 units. That's really how it needs to be looked at. Liquidity will be fine because any single DRK is in fact 100,000,000 duffs and there are coins being added every day through the mining process.
It's an important discussion though and I think it was good you've raised it.
Our, human ability to find ingenious solutions - and I don't mean this to be disparaging,
on the contrary - is a fantastic feature. Tao's 21,000,000,000,000,000 units and your semantic distinction in between "locked up" and "reserved" are examples of it. So, my hypothetical situation that was based on a scenario in which coins are "reserved" i.e. not readily, freely available to purchase on the market unless someone liquidates her or his MN, might not be a feasible scenario at all. Economic forces should take care of it - only that we never before had a situation in which one asset class, the number of its units, is precisely defined by mathematics. (one can calculate to the duff, how many coins are going to be in circulation 274 days or 3 years from today) Such uncharted territory must have some dangers hidden in it, not only on the arcane (for a n00b like me) side of Sybil attacks and what not, but on the economic side of it.
I also do worry about more normal circumstances, in which majority of the coins are not freely available on the market and as such, might create a liquidity problem. This is an age old issue in all the asset markets and not something one should dismiss only because a new market / asset class as Darkcoin / has not encountered any similar problems yet.
However, as a true Darkcoin believer I am indeed inclined to take oblox's view, that my argument is "stupid," as correct, but I will monitor all the statistics that I monitor already anyway, just in case