I still believe that #getintothedark & The Darkcoin Chameleon were (are) a nonsense that hurt because it had been perceived as not serious, while semi-official representative of the Darkcoin community, and as such is a spitting image of the key problem, outlined above in the red.
I think now you are just mean.
How could fan work possibly ever be hurtful to the thing it celebrates?
When has fan art ever hurt music or movies or books, etc?
Unfortunately, it might come across that way...but that's certainty not what I intended.
For example, if a fan uses the "Brand Name" twitter feed for posting their own opinions etc...then of course it could damage the integrity of the brand. I had to unfollow darkcoin on twitter because it sounded like a p&d account.
This reminds me that there is an important part of darkcoin business that we haven't really made public yet (not to my knowledge)
Bitcoin is not a "brand" (atleast not in the sense of a product or identity). Everybody can put "bitcoin" in his company name, product or service.
And this is obviously a very important part of bitcoins success story.
If this isn't the case with darkcoin, then we should really straight away clarify this once and for all.
Who owns the darkcoin name?
Who owns the darkcoin logo?
How are they licenced, etc...
Can I go ahead and create a software firm and call it darkcoinsoft.com ?
Can I implement the darkcoin logo in my company logo?