Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4264. (Read 9723748 times)

Yep, right when I finillay got some BTC and put an order.

Anyone have statistics what percentage of miners are on RC4?

I wasn't born there but half my family originates from there and I've lived there on and off for quite a few years.

Re. the trees, yes I know what you mean. The joke is, what do you do if you get lost in a forest in Iceland ? Answer: Stand up

Yep, right when I finillay got some BTC and put an order.

That's what those pictures look like, mossy grass or something.  Very dramatic!  Is that where you are from?

No big dump today? That's boring 

Live webcams from Bárðarbunga ef enhverjum leiðist à að bíða eftir gosi í markaðnum.

http://www.livefromiceland.is/webcams/bardabunga/

http://vedur2.mogt.is/grimsfjall/webcam/

I'm not stalking you Mrs Robinson, honest.

But.

Six and a bit hours ago, you said goodnight.

Then you post here.

I'd call that an addiction to DRK 

Looking for any views on, err, my view on Zerocash being DOA.

In particular, anyone think that the Dean of whatever university, John Hopkins I think, where Zerocash is based becomes responsible for regulatory matters if they launch Zerocash?

All I can say is I'm glad Evan hasn't ever shown signs of losing his temper, ROFL

Jesus Christ I HATE wading through this thread.....

************ ALERT **************

Recovery commenced.

BTC pulling out of the nosedive. Alts turning around.

DRK is now a MUST HAVE alt due to seeing off competition and the massive re-distribution that has just occured during the last dip. People are now starting to discover just how difficult a challenge it is to establish a technically successful privacy blockchain.

DRK is pulling away from the pack in this department. That it would do that was always clear to those of use who with a semblance of technical background, but it's now going start manifesting itself at a market level. The longer it digs itself in and RC4 gets finely honed, the more unique and original this coin is becoming. The masternode approach is working and is turning out to be immensely powerful. The first evidence of this is the recent private audit done by the CLOAK team which failed due to vulnerabilities from malicious nodes. (Although hats off to them for having the audit in the first place. I still hold some CLK).

DRK has an advantage here - again from its layered client-server anonymisation approach. It can throw everything is has into hardening the masternodes without having to worry about them being undermined by client vulnerabilities. Yet another endorsement of Evan's early design decision in this regard. (The other being DRK's superior ability to interface with the bitcoin commercial infrastructure despite supporting such an original approach to anonymsation).

This coin is doing everything right IMHO and steering a precision course through a technical and commercial minefield. In view of this (and the current extraordinary market accessibility) I'm increasing my stake in it's infrastructure and grabbing a 2nd masternode.

Can someone explain what this means please?

The tx has 1 input, 3 outputs, all in/out indexes are zero based, and the value of the outputs is equal to the value of the input.
If the output(s) are less than the input(s) then the difference is the fee paid to the miner.
If the outputs are more than the input(s) then the tx is invalid.

Academics responding to BitLicences

http://www.scribd.com/doc/237139381/Brito-Dourado-NY-Virtual-Currency-Comment-081414

http://www.coindesk.com/academics-call-revisions-new-yorks-bitlicense-proposal/

This actually is rather interesting news.

ZeroCash is a project that was due out by now, so expect it within the next few months.

However, the uncertainties over the BitLicences may mean that we don't expect it at all. Not while there are academics involved.

Their institutions may like the idea of the R&D and the various funding sources, in particular with Zerocash the funding from various global military sources, i.e. governments, but they won't like the risks of the project on the institutions themselves.

Now add the licensing dimension and the extra regulatory burdens that could make deans liable for prosecution and all of a sudden Zerocash looks DOA while its tied to academia.

First DarkWallet gets taken down by ISPs

Then Zerocash gets pulled by BitLicences and school Deans running scared.

Fundamentals, gotta have those fundamentals.

Genius work Evan: +101

I don't think anyone denied Camo had issues, at one stage it seemed his issues had issues, it was the way he went about reporting his problems...  It was like he squatted down, did a massive turd in his hands, then ran around the RC4 party and smeared it on all our faces when we were trying to celebrate and enjoy some nice moments...

Someone who was part of the instamine must have been dumping since the original peak.

I honestly think in a moderated thread without trolls we'd start trolling ourselves....

Anyhoo.. back to work. Too much BCT lately.