Off topic question:
ANONCOIN claims they are the first anonymous coin, yet I never see any talk of anoncoin in that regard??? Just seeking info, I know there is knowledge a plenty here...thanks
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4503. (Read 9723733 times)
August 08, 2014, 11:34:32 AM
August 08, 2014, 11:31:56 AM
What's the fastest amd and nvidia miners right now and where are their links? If they are closed source also provide the alternative, slower, open source.
I want to update the wiki because it's kind of obsolete in this department.
Please provide some indicative numbers for cards like 280s / 290s, 750/780 Tis.
sgminer v5 is the fastest AMD miner at the moment that I know of.I want to update the wiki because it's kind of obsolete in this department.
Please provide some indicative numbers for cards like 280s / 290s, 750/780 Tis.
My R9 280x Powercolors get 4.2 Mh/s each
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sgminer-v5-optimized-x11x13neoscryptlyra2reetc-kernel-switch-miner-632503
August 08, 2014, 11:27:33 AM
What's the fastest amd and nvidia miners right now and where are their links? If they are closed source also provide the alternative, slower, open source.
I want to update the wiki because it's kind of obsolete in this department.
Please provide some indicative numbers for cards like 280s / 290s, 750/780 Tis.
I want to update the wiki because it's kind of obsolete in this department.
Please provide some indicative numbers for cards like 280s / 290s, 750/780 Tis.
August 08, 2014, 11:26:37 AM
Dude, they're mining rigs...why update them at all? I'd leave them going for months on end untouched (assuming you can monitor that the cards are still outputting fully).
Ya I have monitoring programs, CG Remote etc...
I don't want any weak entry points on my network, so I keep all PC's fully updated at all times...
But they aren't "entry points"; they're NATed (PATed, even). Someone needs to compromise your gateway before getting a crack at any of your rigs. Since they are (should be) only connecting to mining pool(s), that's the main point of weakness, and it's doubtful that OS updates would mitigate that in any real capacity (not that I believe this particular vector is significant in the first place).
It just seems like a total waste of time to me. (note: I mean all of this in a friendly manner)
Agree on that. Waste of time to update mining nodes, unless you need some update for new mining software or so.
(like 14.6 amd drivers, or so)
This will free up a lot of my time...
Why, you won't even know what to do with yourself!
You could start playing LoL or something.
August 08, 2014, 11:25:14 AM
Imagine how fun it would be to one day have the current years edition of the Darkcoin client for sale at all major electronics and software stores. Can you visualize the box it would be sold in, its colour, the price on the sticker in the upper right corner?
Imagine if the Darkcoin client eventually become the main operating system for computers and replaces Microsoft Windows and Apple. What if Darkcoin gained the support of influential companies, such as Google, and optimized it's operating system in conjunction with such a company to create a separate integrated de-centralized operating system and browser and internet and with the charity idea where everyone in the world gets Darkcoin, a new internet basically owned directly by the whole world. We could even make an agreement with such a company as Google one day, give them full exclusivity for advertisement if they agree to never ever gather any information on anyone who uses the system and subject their part of the system to also be open sourced.
The beauty of ideas on such a day, who knows which ones will flourish, so many are solid, lilies, so many like clouds.
This would also give everyone in the world a direct linking of stakeholdership and shareholdership in their present and in their future, a wonderful pillar for the creation of lasting oneness, compassion and love on our planet. Its a beautiful future where we can share Darkcoin with our kids one day, and where they can share them with their neighbours on the path to enlightenment.
Imagine if the internet is one day replaced or joined by a Darknet, same thing as todays internet but protected from controlling influence and anonymous, for everybody and conceived to darken the sight of censure, an internet run off of a fully secure and untraceable de-centralized masternode supported system.
Imagine all the people...
Imagine if the Darkcoin client eventually become the main operating system for computers and replaces Microsoft Windows and Apple. What if Darkcoin gained the support of influential companies, such as Google, and optimized it's operating system in conjunction with such a company to create a separate integrated de-centralized operating system and browser and internet and with the charity idea where everyone in the world gets Darkcoin, a new internet basically owned directly by the whole world. We could even make an agreement with such a company as Google one day, give them full exclusivity for advertisement if they agree to never ever gather any information on anyone who uses the system and subject their part of the system to also be open sourced.
The beauty of ideas on such a day, who knows which ones will flourish, so many are solid, lilies, so many like clouds.This would also give everyone in the world a direct linking of stakeholdership and shareholdership in their present and in their future, a wonderful pillar for the creation of lasting oneness, compassion and love on our planet. Its a beautiful future where we can share Darkcoin with our kids one day, and where they can share them with their neighbours on the path to enlightenment.
Imagine if the internet is one day replaced or joined by a Darknet, same thing as todays internet but protected from controlling influence and anonymous, for everybody and conceived to darken the sight of censure, an internet run off of a fully secure and untraceable de-centralized masternode supported system.
Imagine all the people...
August 08, 2014, 11:11:23 AM
Dude, they're mining rigs...why update them at all? I'd leave them going for months on end untouched (assuming you can monitor that the cards are still outputting fully).
Ya I have monitoring programs, CG Remote etc...
I don't want any weak entry points on my network, so I keep all PC's fully updated at all times...
But they aren't "entry points"; they're NATed (PATed, even). Someone needs to compromise your gateway before getting a crack at any of your rigs. Since they are (should be) only connecting to mining pool(s), that's the main point of weakness, and it's doubtful that OS updates would mitigate that in any real capacity (not that I believe this particular vector is significant in the first place).
It just seems like a total waste of time to me. (note: I mean all of this in a friendly manner)
Agree on that. Waste of time to update mining nodes, unless you need some update for new mining software or so.
(like 14.6 amd drivers, or so)
This will free up a lot of my time...
August 08, 2014, 11:07:08 AM
Dude, they're mining rigs...why update them at all? I'd leave them going for months on end untouched (assuming you can monitor that the cards are still outputting fully).
Ya I have monitoring programs, CG Remote etc...
I don't want any weak entry points on my network, so I keep all PC's fully updated at all times...
But they aren't "entry points"; they're NATed (PATed, even). Someone needs to compromise your gateway before getting a crack at any of your rigs. Since they are (should be) only connecting to mining pool(s), that's the main point of weakness, and it's doubtful that OS updates would mitigate that in any real capacity (not that I believe this particular vector is significant in the first place).
It just seems like a total waste of time to me. (note: I mean all of this in a friendly manner)
Agree on that. Waste of time to update mining nodes, unless you need some update for new mining software or so.
(like 14.6 amd drivers, or so)
August 08, 2014, 10:44:29 AM
Dude, they're mining rigs...why update them at all? I'd leave them going for months on end untouched (assuming you can monitor that the cards are still outputting fully).
Ya I have monitoring programs, CG Remote etc...
I don't want any weak entry points on my network, so I keep all PC's fully updated at all times...
But they aren't "entry points"; they're NATed (PATed, even). Someone needs to compromise your gateway before getting a crack at any of your rigs. Since they are (should be) only connecting to mining pool(s), that's the main point of weakness, and it's doubtful that OS updates would mitigate that in any real capacity (not that I believe this particular vector is significant in the first place).
It just seems like a total waste of time to me. (note: I mean all of this in a friendly manner)
August 08, 2014, 10:34:00 AM
Broken 0.01 across the board 
August 08, 2014, 10:20:29 AM
now the support wall have decreasing and sell wall is increasing.
August 08, 2014, 10:19:34 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
really
is anybody not paying attention ?
too busy watching coinmarketcrap and price charts
Am I reading Wisdom wrong or was there just a 134 BTC buy at Finex?
yes you are reading it right.
QED
Great timing
August 08, 2014, 10:15:36 AM
Very good questions. I'm excited that we're starting to see some higher level questions again.
1.) Payee addresses are arguably the less important aspect of privacy. As the sender, it's more important to protect your identity. The other side can simply be addressed by generating a new change address per payment. Between the two of these the system would be completely anonymous. Also, after receiving payment, your client will prepare the funds again, increasing their anonymity.
2.) There's not a perfect solution to this yet, but Masternode operators have an interest in getting more darkcoin and keeping their existing inventment as valuable as possible. By attacking the network, they would cause harm to their investment. Also, the client is resistant to DDOS attack currently and masternode operators are instructed to close all other ports and have some kind of DDOS protection.
As a longer term solution, we could not broadcast the IPs of masternodes, but an identifier. Users could then say they want to broadcast to that masternode, but not actually connect to it. This would hide the identities and create a much more robust system.
Indeed it was needed here I assume. I'm trying to get input from both sides which should be useful for the coin and for every individual who is interested in learning. I do agree that payee addresses are not that important. Privacy and identity is something that has been at risk over the past few years more than ever, it's obvious that it needs to be protected. 1.) Payee addresses are arguably the less important aspect of privacy. As the sender, it's more important to protect your identity. The other side can simply be addressed by generating a new change address per payment. Between the two of these the system would be completely anonymous. Also, after receiving payment, your client will prepare the funds again, increasing their anonymity.
2.) There's not a perfect solution to this yet, but Masternode operators have an interest in getting more darkcoin and keeping their existing inventment as valuable as possible. By attacking the network, they would cause harm to their investment. Also, the client is resistant to DDOS attack currently and masternode operators are instructed to close all other ports and have some kind of DDOS protection.
As a longer term solution, we could not broadcast the IPs of masternodes, but an identifier. Users could then say they want to broadcast to that masternode, but not actually connect to it. This would hide the identities and create a much more robust system.
I thought so to, eventually there will be something that would give enough protection. Interesting that you though of an identifier, the system is better off set up like that. I'll try to get an insight from the other side again.
August 08, 2014, 10:14:11 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
really
is anybody not paying attention ?
too busy watching coinmarketcrap and price charts
Am I reading Wisdom wrong or was there just a 134 BTC buy at Finex?
yes you are reading it right.
August 08, 2014, 10:13:38 AM
At first I thought you were being a troll but now I realise you're maybe not familiar with Linux. New versions of Linux are often less secure because they require new dependencies which may not have been fully developed. So old versions of Linux that are stable don't generally require updates. They are stable and secure, unlike windows. (Except where there are documented vulnerabilities like heartbleed).
Also, if you do unnecessary updates regularly you may break a perfectly functioning MN.
I think almost all MN owners know how to update. Security wise, most MNs have firewalls built in with ports shut, even ssh. SSH is a huge vulnerability. If we shut them down, no updates will be needed.
Also, if you do unnecessary updates regularly you may break a perfectly functioning MN.
I think almost all MN owners know how to update. Security wise, most MNs have firewalls built in with ports shut, even ssh. SSH is a huge vulnerability. If we shut them down, no updates will be needed.
I thought I was being misinterpreted
Now I see that in this particular case (MN) the need for SO updates, expecially on older (stable) linux versions, is almost inexistant. Great August 08, 2014, 10:11:59 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
really
is anybody not paying attention ?
too busy watching coinmarketcrap and price charts
Am I reading Wisdom wrong or was there just a 134 BTC buy at Finex?
August 08, 2014, 10:07:52 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
really
is anybody not paying attention ?
too busy watching coinmarketcrap and price charts
August 08, 2014, 10:00:40 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
really
is anybody not paying attention ?
August 08, 2014, 09:57:58 AM
With 5000 drk limit, I think Evan mentioned it is possible to override. So u can try to start with enable darksend rounds 8. Can't remember exact command.
I think I'll just hold my wallets cold until a better denom scheme is implemented... May be done before RC4 goes mainnet...I think this is for you....
Quote
Hmm? I'm not sure where you got this from, but it's not the case at all. The 5000DRK limit is for a hard limit for the entire wallet. Lets say a user has 100k DRK, the wallet would actually end up making a bunch of 500DRK inputs and 100DRK inputs. The only reason I added the hard limit was because there's no easy way to denominate a portion of the wallet without doing the rest.
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-testing.1830/page-77
August 08, 2014, 09:54:49 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
just get on the email circulation list
August 08, 2014, 09:51:46 AM
Quote from: eduffield
Once released, masternodes that haven't updated will not be paid anymore, instantly. So there will be a hurry and the ones that do it first, will get all of the first payments :-)
MN operators should pay attention for RC4.
Jump to: