For the ETH mining, is 390X faster than the 390 at the same clock?
No.
Topic: [ANN] sgminer v5 - optimized X11/X13/NeoScrypt/Lyra2RE/etc. kernel-switch miner (Read 877795 times)
March 24, 2017, 07:12:20 AM
No.
November 20, 2016, 01:03:03 PM
Isn't EthOS a linux based thing? How this program will help under Windows? 
I would suggest WattTool:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series
I would suggest WattTool:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1609782/watttool-a-simple-tool-that-combines-overclocking-with-vrm-monitoring-tweaking-for-rx-400-series
Did he mention his OS? I could have missed it.
November 20, 2016, 11:48:37 AM
I have rx480, windows non-whql-16.9.1-Sep7 driver and nicehash 5.5.0
Did anyone manage to accomplish such simple thing as: sgminer --gpu-fan 50
I was also unable to set clocks and voltage with this. Is it supported?
Did anyone manage to accomplish such simple thing as: sgminer --gpu-fan 50
I was also unable to set clocks and voltage with this. Is it supported?
Look Here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/gigabytes-easytune-fan-controll-tunning-1630513
Look into EthOS - they're using a tool I wrote for them to control much of that stuff, although it's not feature-complete.
April 08, 2017, 06:30:57 PM
SO..
(noob question)
How would i add this code into the baikal ui version of sgminer for multi-algo, autoprofit-switch?
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X11_auto-switch",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "BTC_address",
"pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0;f6=0;f7=0;f8=0;f9=0",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X13_auto-switch",
"url" : "stratum+tcp:/x13.eu.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "BTC_address",
"pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0;f6=0;f7=0;f8=0;f9=0",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod"
},
{
"name" : "some third-party X11 backup pool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://x11-backup-pool:3333",
"user" : "user",
"pass" : "pass",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod"
}
],
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "300",
"queue" : "0",
... other configuration settings ...
}
(noob question)
How would i add this code into the baikal ui version of sgminer for multi-algo, autoprofit-switch?
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X11_auto-switch",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://x11.eu.nicehash.com:4336",
"user" : "BTC_address",
"pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0;f6=0;f7=0;f8=0;f9=0",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod"
},
{
"name" : "NiceHash_X13_auto-switch",
"url" : "stratum+tcp:/x13.eu.nicehash.com:4337",
"user" : "BTC_address",
"pass" : "f0=0;f2=0;f3=4;f4=3;f5=0;f6=0;f7=0;f8=0;f9=0",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "marucoin-mod"
},
{
"name" : "some third-party X11 backup pool",
"url" : "stratum+tcp://x11-backup-pool:3333",
"user" : "user",
"pass" : "pass",
"nfactor" : "10",
"algorithm" : "darkcoin-mod"
}
],
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "300",
"queue" : "0",
... other configuration settings ...
}
July 02, 2016, 06:00:22 PM
Is there a version of sgminer that has the same increase in hashrate for certain algorithms as the latest NiceHashMiner ?
Are a new .Bin & .bat layout in order or is this an exclusive NiceHash thing for their profit switching miner ?
12MH/s on a AMD 280x with X11 is quite good compared to the 8MH/s with Wolf0 optimized .bins
Are a new .Bin & .bat layout in order or is this an exclusive NiceHash thing for their profit switching miner ?
12MH/s on a AMD 280x with X11 is quite good compared to the 8MH/s with Wolf0 optimized .bins
NicehashMiner is just a GUI over SGMiner and other miners.
May 22, 2016, 07:30:46 AM
ok found it 2 minutes later https://github.com/wolf9466/wolf-xmr-miner...
Oh?
https://github.com/wolf9466/wolf-xmr-miner
yeah like i said above
talking about spreadminer for amd, is still slow as fuck?
found nothing inus this unfinished https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671784.20, the repo do not work anymore
Oh?
https://github.com/wolf9466/wolf-xmr-miner
yeah like i said above
talking about spreadminer for amd, is still slow as fuck?
It's not unfinished - the repo works... and about Spread, dunno, I think so?
May 22, 2016, 05:53:07 AM
found nothing inus this unfinished https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671784.20, the repo do not work anymore
Oh?
https://github.com/wolf9466/wolf-xmr-miner
May 22, 2016, 05:19:57 AM
there is any open source cryptonote miner for amd? also spreadminer is included here?
Open cryptonote miner for AMD - only one is mine, IIRC.
i can not find your miner, it come with fee like the one from clymore?
and what about the hashrate on a 390 for example?
No fee - same speed as his. Check Github?Low
May 22, 2016, 04:48:56 AM
there is any open source cryptonote miner for amd? also spreadminer is included here?
Open cryptonote miner for AMD - only one is mine, IIRC.
April 13, 2016, 08:58:20 PM
Yeah if you are using linux and you have a bunch of Pitcairn or Tahiti cards you need to switch to Windows to get the fast X11 speed.
Swapping the bin file won't work.
Swapping the bin file won't work.
Just to show it IS possible (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/nh-stolen-x11-linux.png
I've not gotten Hawaii working right yet - also doing speedups, but it's slow going in GCN assembly dumps.
April 12, 2016, 03:20:41 AM
I'm not sure if you are refering to this source code:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11319732
Is there any chance to get these high hash rates with linux as well?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11319732
Is there any chance to get these high hash rates with linux as well?
It's possible, but not without changing the code.
April 05, 2016, 09:25:01 AM
Anyone know how to get the optimized X11 kernel working under Linux. The one where a 280X gets 11MH/s.
It works under windows using sgminer 5.1.0 optimized nicehash but for linux I can't find that version and when I used 5.3.0, it gave me errors when I replaced the bins with the optimized ones.
It works under windows using sgminer 5.1.0 optimized nicehash but for linux I can't find that version and when I used 5.3.0, it gave me errors when I replaced the bins with the optimized ones.
see my comment two posts over yours.
I see, So the only way right now is to use them under Windows?
AFAIK, yes. Unless you want to reverse-engineer it.
It's not hard. Pallas, look at the disassembly for under a minute, and you'll probably get it, lol
April 03, 2016, 08:24:43 PM
anyway to get the x11 hashrate nicehash miner gives on windows, on linux?
messed around a bit with bins and settings and compiled miners from 3 diff source codes
best ive got was 8Mh per 290x
messed around a bit with bins and settings and compiled miners from 3 diff source codes
best ive got was 8Mh per 290x
Yeah, but you need to modify the sgminer source.
March 25, 2016, 08:07:52 PM
Hooray!
I've done it!
I was able to cross compile nicehash sgminer 5.3.0 with mxe and cpu load is 0% now ))))
So problem was really in pthreads!
ron31
look at this table to understand what to buy
http://www.mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php
and this calculator what to mine
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency
I've done it!
I was able to cross compile nicehash sgminer 5.3.0 with mxe and cpu load is 0% now ))))
So problem was really in pthreads!
ron31
look at this table to understand what to buy
http://www.mininghwcomparison.com/list/index.php
and this calculator what to mine
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency
Congrats. Told you - some pthreads implementations dor Windows are really bad.
March 24, 2016, 02:58:25 PM
Please help me who cross compiled sgminer with mxe!
I'm trying to cross compile sgminer 5.3.0 from nicehash github with mxe (mxe release from august 2015)
with winpthreads that is a part of mingw-w64 4.0.4 compiling succesful but sgminer.exe causes 50% cpu load
I tried to compile pthreads 2.8 with mxe and then sgminer but got an error
I tried more old mxe with gcc 4.9.2 but the same error occured
mxe with gcc 4.9.2 even can't compile with winpthreads((
I'm trying to cross compile sgminer 5.3.0 from nicehash github with mxe (mxe release from august 2015)
with winpthreads that is a part of mingw-w64 4.0.4 compiling succesful but sgminer.exe causes 50% cpu load
I tried to compile pthreads 2.8 with mxe and then sgminer but got an error
Code:
sgminer.c: In function 'api_thread':
sgminer.c:5022:14: error: incompatible types when assigning to type 'pthread_t' from type 'long int'
PTH(mythr) = 0L;
I tried more old mxe with gcc 4.9.2 but the same error occured
mxe with gcc 4.9.2 even can't compile with winpthreads((
Yeah, winpthreads is garbage.
March 23, 2016, 06:39:26 PM
Wolf0
https://github.com/tpruvot/sgminer/releases
you've faced the same problem and used gcc 6
it helped you?
https://github.com/tpruvot/sgminer/releases
you've faced the same problem and used gcc 6
it helped you?
I compile my own deps for a reason.
March 23, 2016, 06:26:36 PM
Using the same pthread lib?
pthreads-4.0.4(with 2.8.0 was an error). gcc version 5.2.0
And if you're using the same one for every build, little wonder they all have the same CPU issue...
March 23, 2016, 06:06:25 PM
More than likely, the CPU load is YOUR fault.
you mean i built wrong or problem in OS?
sgminer 5.3.0 compiled by nicehash (which is in nicehash miner) does 50% cpu usage on 2 different rigs
sgminer 5.3.0 compiled by me does the same thing ((
sgminer 5.2.1(by nicehash) does well
Using the same pthread lib?
March 23, 2016, 05:43:29 PM
sgminer.exe is giving me 50% cpu usage. I am mining with NiceHash Miner, using AMD OpenCL mining only, with an AMD Radeon 7750 graphics card.
How can I correct the high cpu usage to normal 1-5%? I am using the blake256r8vnl algorithm.
How can I correct the high cpu usage to normal 1-5%? I am using the blake256r8vnl algorithm.
I got this problem too in windows in ALL algos. Problem is in sgminer 5.3.0 because 5.2.1 is working well. I tried to cross-compile manually with mxe - 50% CPU load. What could be the problem? I built with ADL_SDK 6.0, AMD APP SDK 2.9-1, curl 7.33, jansson-2.7, pdcurses-3.4, pthreads-4.0.4(with 2.8.0 was an error). gcc version 5.2.0
More than likely, the CPU load is YOUR fault.
March 23, 2016, 01:44:44 AM
The dev of this fork asked me to do a Win64 release. To be clear - my signature asserts it was built from the https://github.com/tpruvot/sgminer repository at commit cfc6e1ede0e385a9c0d4aea61692f79698b3e93a, and does NOT imply I vouch for the sources therein - only that they were compiled as-is.
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/downloads/tpruvot/sgminer-tpruvot-cfc6e1e-wolfbuild-Win64.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/downloads/tpruvot/sgminer-tpruvot-cfc6e1e-wolfbuild-Win64.zip.sig
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/downloads/tpruvot/sgminer-tpruvot-cfc6e1e-wolfbuild-Win64.zip
https://ottrbutt.com/miner/downloads/tpruvot/sgminer-tpruvot-cfc6e1e-wolfbuild-Win64.zip.sig
Jump to: