Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 4904. (Read 9723748 times)

comply or lose a lot of mining in a few weeks

I fail to see how the loss of a multipool is going to damage the DRK ecosystem. All it does is limit the options of your miners.

Well, we don't run an off the shelf solution, so to create a proper implementation, would take quiet some time, all to make 20% less coin. DRK womps.

0.01 is the bottom? crazy undervalued price for the first coin which could provide privacy

^This amuses me.

bump

I'm so annoyed to people selling huge amounts of dark on this ridiculous prices, why they hurt the coin instead of letting the price rise so they can profit more, also i hate those idiots on cryptsy trollbox insulting the darkcoin and talking about other clones and scam coins like they are better from our DARK...also i hope evan will make an positive announcement as soon as possible because the coin is being dumped because too many investors are afraid of the wallet bugs,the difficulty of setting up an masternode and we need immidiately to get ridd off those pools which are not willing to update they are scaring the hell out of the peoples..this coins is not stable anymore...WE NEED TO FIX THOSE ISSUES FIXED IMMIDIATELY ...there is not more time for fail,,this need to be done fast and with reliability.....I HOPE EVAN WILL DELIVER AND PERFECT CODING JOB WITHOUT ERRORS THIS TIME ON THE RC4......the price is hurting too many investors who are panic selling and too many enemies trying to kill the coin also ...GO DARK PROVE THEM WRONG...we need dark to rise to 0.03..this is more suitable for this coin ...we can even see bigger prices...RISE DARK ..RISE TO THE MOON!!

Are you guys serious with these requirements?

We're just going to take DRK off of our rotation-- if your wallet can't handle payments automagically, it's just a headache.

We run highly custom software, and have no interest as of yet to make it DarkNode compatible. I don't understand why they can't put this in to the wallet?

Privacy is extremely hard to come by on the Internet. Bitcoin itself is not very private right now.

Publication of the owner of a single Bitcoin address can yield an incredible amount of personal financial information, information that cannot be put ‘back in the box’ – it will be available forever, encoded into the blockchain. This is the sort of information that law enforcement agencies would typically need to subpoena a bank for; instead right now we offer it to the entire Internet.

We haven’t yet seen significant involvement from consumer privacy agencies at the Foundation, but I believe they will be horrified when they understand just how much private financial data is being broadcast and permanently recorded.

This information directly impacts citizens living under repressive governments. It could cause physical harm to a woman whose finances are controlled by her pimp or her kidnapper. The knowledge of transactions can be combined with violence to limit any human’s fundamental right to transact economically.

It seems therefore critical that we do everything we can to support efforts that enhance this privacy from global inspection. Technological efforts like trustless sharing and ZeroCoin/ZeroCash have potential to improve the privacy guarantees available to those using Bitcoin.

Not everyone will want this kind of privacy to be available.  In some jurisdictions, concerns over money laundering are brought up as the reason why such privacy should not be available.

I believe that these concerns are real and valid, and pragmatically, that a balance needs to be struck. We don’t yet know exactly how to balance the risks to different parties; on the one hand direct violence, control of individuals and financial risks borne by citizens with hyper-inflationary money supply are real harms being borne by human beings around the world right now. On the other hand there are real and more generalized harms to society that money laundering enables.

Right now, I believe the most reasonable regulatory approach is to encourage anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer rules that can be implemented at the ‘endpoints’, Bitcoin exchanges or money transmittal businesses. These businesses already have clear regulation and operations rules and understand how to identify money laundering, and what to do about it when they see it.

At the same time, we need to do better protecting those who have no other safe way to transact economically, and the Foundation will be providing support for a variety of proposals as a way to let the broader community engage with them and assess what would be useful.[/quote]

Peter Vessenes, Chairman of the Board    Apr 05 2014, https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=679


What Darkcoin is doing to create privacy in crypto transactions and in so doing creating eCash:

* Master Nodes These nodes handle the mixing through random selection - eduffield, 10 May 2014. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6643662

* Ring signatures are going to be implemented in V2.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6864666

*IP obfuscation 12 May 2014
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6694377


New Features:

*Checkpoints and Spork 26 June


https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc4-development-and-path-going-forward.1604/


Is this all legal?

Hell, yes.

Jennifer Shasky Calvery, Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, United States Department of the Treasury, confirms that financial privacy is a real and important aspect of all financial transactions.

The view on regulation is currently being considered in a similar light to Bitcoin. The Bank Secrecy Act and existing AML policies towards digital currency will still apply. In general, moving in and out of fiat requires the use of regulated entities.

Non disclosure of financial transactions on a blockchain ledger is not a reason to stop anonymity tools such as Darkcoin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7bbDpwlTws&feature=youtu.be&t=11m48s

~12mins

Maybe so, but this guy calling miners stupid is ridiculous. 

I have one question.  Will the Darkcoin network function without miners and just masternodes?

Master Node pools are being set-up, for those that don't have sufficient DRKs for their own MN.

Are there enough MN pools? No. Will there be more, bloody hope so.

1. Mine
2. Send coins to MN pool

Only thing missing from this rationale: Miners can use their mined DRKs for buying masternodes / masternode slices and increase their DRKs.

It's not a zero sum game if you invest your mined DRKs in masternodes.

Earn your own DRK coins by mining at the multipool. Not only that, you can earn DRK using your old ASIC hardware on SHA256 and SCRYPT coins!


 

!

Look all good
with 14,6 drivers just look here --> http://scr.hu/1ame/ku6jo

EDIT: I have 1 PSU Fatal1ty 750W 80+ Bronze semi-modular for sale now

EDIT2: tried to connect to their chat on the poolbut I get always banned

[19:14] == ##dedicatedpool Cannot join channel (+b) - you are banned

Thnx super !!!Works perfectly Just changed everything

[/quote]

Wow.  Did you ever stop to think that if it wasn't for these "stupid miners" this coin would be nothing?

And what are you now?  A new branch of the IRS?  Only your task is to enforce masternode tax payment compliance.

Yeah screw the lowly miner that helped make this coin what it is.  They now get taxed 20% so the mighty mastermind operators can keep getting richer.  Don't you see how this is starting to look?  

Just sold off 75% of my remaining crypto holdings to buy more DRK. Some may say that it's foolish to put all your eggs in one basket, but at $7 per DRK, I feel like I'd be an idiot to miss this opportunity.

My 270's pulled about 75W each from the wall IIRC, so a good 750W PSU should be OK for 3 280s.

true as they only want to make a quick profit and they don't give a damn abut anything

750W PSU is generally ok for 2 GPU but 3 may fry it
you may want to look into a 1000W PSU if you want to run 3 cards
EDIT: you may be able to get away with it if you are not running catalyst 14.6 drivers, as they increase performance by between 30% and 40%