Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5090. (Read 9723858 times)

Yes there is a problem with SSL certificates, for me it was just in Safari. On one machine I fixed it by removing the certificates, but it doesn't seem to work on my others. Try Firefox.

Is anyone else having trouble accessing darkcointalk.org?

Is anyone else having trouble accessing darkcointalk.org?

Please elaborate on - PoBc (proof of blockchain)
The fuck is this suppose ta be?

Makes me think of - PoE (proof of existence)
http://www.proofofexistence.com/

Yup you are right. Send an email to [email protected] to receive 1% of entire DRK in existence to level things out. That's how I got mine!

Some Darkcoiners are very arrogant people. Just like early Bitcoiners, there is a secret group that believes that Darkcoins should be in "right" hands and not everyone deserves it. Sending an email solved the problem for me. Hope it does for you too. 

Great Idea. I really like it.
Thanks for the update

Yup watching and cracking myself up the whole day. I obviously resisted the urge to post. This is as spectacular a scam as can be. Jaslee = Ultra Douchebag de jour.

Hi folks

We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.

For the time being, here's a little bit of information:

- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.

- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.

- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.

- XC and Cache will not share features

- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?

- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.

- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.

- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.


Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.

From richest address link we can see there so many drks owner by fewer people.(743 address have 85.77% drks), this maybe the restrict for DRK's grow road.

http://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-darkcoin-addresses.html


Balance   Addresses   % Addresses (Total)   Coins   $USD   % Coins (Total)
0 - 0.0001   916   3.52% (100%)   0.2366 DRK   2.32 USD   0% (100%)
0.001 - 0.01   2525   9.71% (96.48%)   10.83 DRK   106.00 USD   0% (100%)
0.01 - 0.1   6482   24.93% (86.77%)   151.58 DRK   1,484 USD   0% (100%)
0.1 - 1   4170   16.04% (61.84%)   1,778 DRK   17,406 USD   0.04% (100%)
1 - 10   5329   20.5% (45.8%)   20,159 DRK   197,380 USD   0.46% (99.96%)
10 - 100   4223   16.24% (25.3%)   136,834 DRK   1,339,738 USD   3.1% (99.5%)
100 - 1,000   1558   5.99% (9.06%)   468,236 DRK   4,584,478 USD   10.62% (96.39%)
1,000 - 10,000   743   2.86% (3.07%)   1,308,136 DRK   12,807,919 USD   29.68% (85.77%)
10,000 - 100,000   52   0.2% (0.21%)   1,510,376 DRK   14,788,042 USD   34.27% (56.09%)
100,000 - 1,000,000   3   0.01% (0.01%)   961,658 DRK   9,415,556 USD   21.82% (21.82%)

For those who haven't been keeping with our competitors this weekend...

Cryptcoin has exploded spectacularly immediately after that BTC-E rumour pump.

XC just announced lolzy marraige plans with an obscure alt called CacheCoin! Plans include swapping each-others core features, synch each-others live blockchains so they can do things to each-other, do a "complete rewriting of the satoshi codebase", and base everything on something called "proof of blockchain". Maybe someone had a sale on hot air & whitepapers. XC has fallen amongst disbelieving protests from the less gullible XC people, and CacheCoin has already jumped from 90th to 67th in market cap in a few hours (no doubt the insiders who knew about the marraige have done very well for themselves).

However tempting it might be please don't go trolling them when they're down, it's entertaining enough just to sit with popcorn.

Great, thanks Evan!

Intrawallet ATMs to support Darkcoin

http://thecoinfront.com/interwallet-machines-could-provid-full-bitcoin-lifestyle-solutions/


The "You can't buy anything with it!" arguments just vanished in a puff of smoke.

I have decided to go ahead and sell the domain name drkcoin.org.  Asking 5 Bitcoin through escrow or best offer. PM me your offers.

Go Dark!