[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5199.

tifozi

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 501

Quote from: chaeplin on June 16, 2014, 08:48:35 PM

To p2pool owner

msg from dstorm who develops p2pool-drk.

https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/page-5#post-8630

Quote

P2Pool update is now available. Sorry about the delay. I have been sick for almost two weeks.
https://bitbucket.org/dstorm/p2pool-drk

It supports both block types so you can update now. It will detect when masternode payments start.

* update your wallet to 9.10.1 first, p2pool-drk will deny to connect old version wallet.

Thank you Dr. dstorm and President Chaeplin Grin

p2pool Node http://54.186.8.140:7903/static/ updated with latest darkcoind and RC3 ready p2pool

Quote from: Anon136 on June 16, 2014, 09:04:25 PM

is there anyone here who is versed on some of the technical aspects of this crypto?

Several members have knowledge of technical aspects but obviously Evan can explain the finer details. If you had any questions, feel free to post them so all of us can participate and educate each other

I miss the days when AnonyMint and others were hashing out some of the early framework/architecture through open dialogues.

Anon136

legendary

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1217

is there anyone here who is versed on some of the technical aspects of this crypto?

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

To p2pool owner

msg from dstorm who develops p2pool-drk.

https://www.darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/page-5#post-8630

Quote

P2Pool update is now available. Sorry about the delay. I have been sick for almost two weeks.
https://bitbucket.org/dstorm/p2pool-drk

It supports both block types so you can update now. It will detect when masternode payments start.

* update your wallet to 9.10.1 first, p2pool-drk will deny to connect old version wallet.

NoveltyLab

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

HolyTransaction.com

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: NoveltyLab on June 16, 2014, 07:23:22 PM

Thanks! We will keep you updated

We are going through accelerator session in the Bay Area.

Would be good if coins are on blockchain.

Yes! We are currently reworking our security model in such way that we'll have no control over user funds, like blockchain.info

If you want to know more about it, you can check Andrey's interview from last week: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ1-6IFoUig

NoveltyLab

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

HolyTransaction.com

Quote from: Propulsion on June 16, 2014, 06:20:30 PM

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on June 16, 2014, 06:18:08 PM

Interesting, but what does this mean?
Will you be licensed in USA?
Yes. We can’t share any details because of NDA’s. But we hope to launch in the US market very soon.
What are NDA's?
Acronyms are the bane of my existence, LOL

Non Disclosure Agreement.

Thanks! We will keep you updated

We are going through accelerator session in the Bay Area.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Propulsion on June 16, 2014, 06:20:30 PM

Non Disclosure Agreement.

Ah, thank you Propulsion Cheesy

Mr. President, I didn't read that part about the nodes being unable to influence or gather info. Yes, if that were the case, I agree that it wouldn't matter how many there were.

Ozziecoin

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: chaeplin on June 16, 2014, 06:49:48 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 02:53:39 PM

Quote from: camosoul on June 16, 2014, 01:44:37 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 01:33:35 PM

I knew you'd come over to the d[a]rk side eventually... ;-)

Just keeping an eye on things. I would actually prefer 1 more layer of master nodes in the tx process so that a trusted node could be used for the initial transaction. If I understand things correctly and the master node your transaction randomly ends up using is malicious, you are no more secure than using Bitcoin. That's sort of like rolling the dice with your anonymity on every tx. With so few master nodes and the hurdle to run one acting as an artificial price stimulus, the risk is pretty high to warrant an investment to enter the space.

FYI:

Evan's reply

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6815040

Quote

I think we'll always have 70-80% of the masternodes operatored by individuals even after they're really expensive to run. But when they get that expensive, it would be nice to have some kind of alternative for investors/supporters. It also increases the overall capitalization of the masternode network, which is really good for the coin. Otherwise this is going to become something just for large investors really quick, so I think it's a good compromise.

PS, masternode centralization in the future doesn't cause any problems for darkcoin. I have 2 possible solutions to evaluate for V2 of darksend (ring signatures and encrypted system where the users themselves do the joining relayed through the masternodes.) . Both of these make the masternodes unaware of who is sending money to whom, so centralization isn't an issue at that point.

my understanding is to run darksend at least twice. It would require collusion between owners of MN 1 and 2 for the transaction to be revealed.

camosoul

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

www.OroCoin.co

Quote from: chaeplin on June 16, 2014, 06:49:48 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 02:53:39 PM

Quote from: camosoul on June 16, 2014, 01:44:37 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 01:33:35 PM

I knew you'd come over to the d[a]rk side eventually... ;-)

Just keeping an eye on things. I would actually prefer 1 more layer of master nodes in the tx process so that a trusted node could be used for the initial transaction. If I understand things correctly and the master node your transaction randomly ends up using is malicious, you are no more secure than using Bitcoin. That's sort of like rolling the dice with your anonymity on every tx. With so few master nodes and the hurdle to run one acting as an artificial price stimulus, the risk is pretty high to warrant an investment to enter the space.

FYI:

Evan's reply

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6815040

Quote

I think we'll always have 70-80% of the masternodes operatored by individuals even after they're really expensive to run. But when they get that expensive, it would be nice to have some kind of alternative for investors/supporters. It also increases the overall capitalization of the masternode network, which is really good for the coin. Otherwise this is going to become something just for large investors really quick, so I think it's a good compromise.

PS, masternode centralization in the future doesn't cause any problems for darkcoin. I have 2 possible solutions to evaluate for V2 of darksend (ring signatures and encrypted system where the users themselves do the joining relayed through the masternodes.). Both of these make the masternodes unaware of who is sending money to whom, so centralization isn't an issue at that point.

The second part should be noted by those who poo-poo multi-entry. Tante... As long as the nodes are ignorant, it doesn't matter if there are only 10 and the NSA owns them all... Still secure and anonymous.

No, it's not like that right now, but that's the plan. People still don't seem to understand that DRK is Alpha software with new ideas never done before... In February masternodes were just "part of the plan." Now what are they?

I love that popping sound...

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 02:53:39 PM

Quote from: camosoul on June 16, 2014, 01:44:37 PM

Quote from: OgNasty on June 16, 2014, 01:33:35 PM

I knew you'd come over to the d[a]rk side eventually... ;-)

Just keeping an eye on things. I would actually prefer 1 more layer of master nodes in the tx process so that a trusted node could be used for the initial transaction. If I understand things correctly and the master node your transaction randomly ends up using is malicious, you are no more secure than using Bitcoin. That's sort of like rolling the dice with your anonymity on every tx. With so few master nodes and the hurdle to run one acting as an artificial price stimulus, the risk is pretty high to warrant an investment to enter the space.

FYI:

Evan's reply

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6815040

Quote

I think we'll always have 70-80% of the masternodes operatored by individuals even after they're really expensive to run. But when they get that expensive, it would be nice to have some kind of alternative for investors/supporters. It also increases the overall capitalization of the masternode network, which is really good for the coin. Otherwise this is going to become something just for large investors really quick, so I think it's a good compromise.

PS, masternode centralization in the future doesn't cause any problems for darkcoin. I have 2 possible solutions to evaluate for V2 of darksend (ring signatures and encrypted system where the users themselves do the joining relayed through the masternodes.) . Both of these make the masternodes unaware of who is sending money to whom, so centralization isn't an issue at that point.

Ozziecoin

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: chaeplin on June 16, 2014, 06:27:24 PM

https://www.darkcoin.io/getstarted.html

Masternode payment start : 88.6 hours left

in wallet notification would help.

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: gujo82 on June 16, 2014, 04:07:11 PM

I think i managed to get the local/remote MN setup working, at least the MN is shown in the masternode list, and i cant see any logs with errors (only have debug.log and db.log).. any way to really confirm its working before 20th?

Running netstat shows active tcp connections both to and from the MN on port 9999, so im guessing it works..? Roll Eyes

Answered ?

Check your remote ip is listed in.

https://elbzo.net/masternodes.html
http://drk.poolhash.org/masternode.html

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: gujo82 on June 16, 2014, 04:50:06 PM

tailing my debug.log on the MN now (mainnet) and all its spamming is this;

2014-06-16 21:49:24 ProcessMessage(dsee, 241 bytes) FAILED

any idea what it means? Huh

edit: seems its doing something right, popped up a few more logs now;

2014-06-16 21:52:16 SetBestChain: new best=000000000000f9 log2_work=58.387887 tx=383336 date=2014-06-16 21:51:3
2014-06-16 21:52:16 CDarkSendPool::NewBlock - Is Masterno
2014-06-16 21:52:16 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

dsee : DarkSend Election Entry
dseep : DarkSend Election Entry Ping

reject wrong DarkSend Election Entry Grin

May be you have RC3 ?

TsuyokuNaritai

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: eduffield on June 12, 2014, 10:26:12 AM

RC3: Hard Fork on June 20th! Please Update!

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/

camosoul

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

www.OroCoin.co

Quote from: chaeplin on June 16, 2014, 06:27:24 PM

https://www.darkcoin.io/getstarted.html
Masternode payment start : 88.6 hours left

88.6 and still all those wrong versions... I hardly pay attention anymore and I'm updated...

chaeplin

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

https://www.darkcoin.io/getstarted.html

Masternode payment start : 88.6 hours left

whymine

newbie

Activity: 58

Merit: 0

Potential Coin. Shall setup a POOL for it.

http://i59.tinypic.com/s5i741.png

Propulsion

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

The Buck Stops Here.

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on June 16, 2014, 06:18:08 PM

Interesting, but what does this mean?
Will you be licensed in USA?
Yes. We can’t share any details because of NDA’s. But we hope to launch in the US market very soon.
What are NDA's?

Acronyms are the bane of my existence, LOL

Non Disclosure Agreement.

TanteStefana2

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1001

Interesting, but what does this mean?
Will you be licensed in USA?
Yes. We can’t share any details because of NDA’s. But we hope to launch in the US market very soon.
What are NDA's?

Acronyms are the bane of my existence, LOL

NoveltyLab

full member

Activity: 221

Merit: 100

HolyTransaction.com

Darkcoin joins HolyTransaction !

HolyTransaction is the universal multi-currency wallet, it comes with integrated exchange, so you can easily convert one cryptocurrency to another, send Blackcoin to a Bitcoin address or even through social networks!

Feel free to read this thread for more information about the wallet.

Propulsion

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

The Buck Stops Here.

Quote from: TanteStefana2 on June 16, 2014, 05:59:56 PM

Has anyone heard from CHAOSiTEC? Is he ok and still with us?

Don't know. He seriously still owes me five dark. Tongue

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 5199. (Read 9723733 times)