Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6124. (Read 9723803 times)

I sold for 0.003 and bought back at 0.0027 But I doubt I will be able to repeat the sell part today as well. The price didn't just fall a bit, it got massively hammered down. Some panic is imminent.
I guess it's time to withdraw to a secured wallet and fire up that node.

hmmm ... take care DRK you are under the spotlights!  

Thanks bro, do you know whats that 45.8% unknown pool at the pools hashrate chart?

coinmine and suchpool stratum is working.

http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html
(Pool hash check is interrupted, because web front is off)

Blocks Found by and Recent blocks are pulled from Darkcoind client.

They have found blocks.

there was a post earlier to say its now working and they are trying to get website going.

bitcoin

china banned it again

5x 280x pull 650w here!

And +1 on p2pool ... Take advantage of this low hashrate and diff to ramp-up payouts!

P2P FTW!!!...node goes down? so what u still get paid

Hashes @coinmine safe? Cant access the pool, but my miners getting accepted shares. Anyone to clarify?

Just a nicely setup bear trap, nothing happens and the feeble hearted sell low and miss the pump....don't be fooled

So I PMed Evan about this, but I figured I'd throw this out to the community to see if you guys could come up with a solution.

I've been thinking about the denomination of coins in darksend and I think I've ran into a problem.

If I want to darksend 954 coins from Address A to Address B, how will this be denominated?  The most obvious way to do it is:

9 entries into the 100 coin pool
5 entries into the 10 coin pool
4 entries into the 1 coin pool

The problem is - it will be clear that Address A sent 954 coins to address B by looking at the block chain - it doesn't matter how much mixing occurs, 954 coins leave address A, then sometime later 954 coins accumulate at address B.

The only way I can think of keep it anonymous is if the coins are sent to multiple receiving addresses. I suggested a while ago in the thread that maybe multiple addresses could be concatenated together and used as a "DarkRecieve" address - this would allow multiple coins to be received in denominated fashion.

Another potential solution is to require that in order to send 954 coins you must have a total of 1000 coins, but this would be a really bad solution because if you just wanted to send 101 coins you would need an addtional 899 coins in your wallet to enter into the 1000 coin pool to ensure anonymity.

Let me know if you guys can think of any great solutions.

UNKNOWN portion is estimated, and is calculated from Darkcoin client.

If block found percentage of other is significantly increased, we have a problem.

But as you can see from here, http://drk.poolhash.org/poolhash.html , obviously not.

Switching to p2p is a no brainer.. everyone do it now! Also, another reason to make sure p2p is patched with the next release.

Yea, go to a p2ppool.

Unless there is proof otherwise this can also been seen as FUD to drop the price. That unknown could be a few unknowns not necessarily one big one. Yay cheap dark! That said everyone should be on p2pool and these scares (real or perceived) would be less of a problem.

imho, people [myself included] are getting worrisome bcs some pools are getting DDOS'ed, and the UNKNOWN portion of the hashrate is significant. This implies that perhaps someone DDOS'ed in order to achieve 51% of the hashrate, thereafter potentially able to manipulate the blockchain.

how do u figure it out? do u use kill-a-meter?

2 x 290 = 600 for both

2 x 270x = 200 for both

600 x .50 = 300 for both
200 x .50 = 100 for both

400watts for rig , is that correct? since I think it is half of scrypt.

Dont know about thoose but my 5x280x rigs pull 750w from wall mining drk.

What's going on with price? Any bad news?

how many watts does 2 x 290 non x and 2 x 270x took on this coin?