Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 633. (Read 9723733 times)

Right in their faces  . Dash, the real honey badger of crypto 

Jaxx.io

https://www.exodus.io/releases/

how can i store my dash coins out of poloniex wallet? is there a tutorial?

does this Ryan Taylor have a bitcointalk account? just curious.......

Have you seen this article about the new CEO of Dash?  It confirms vertoe's accusation that Dash is a 100% centralized project.

Ryan Taylor Takes Over as Dash CEO from Founder Evan Duffield
Evan Duffield, the founder of Dash, is departing from day-to-day duties as CEO of the cryptocurrency project.
18/04/2017
http://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/news/ryan-taylor-takes-dash-ceo-founder-evan-duffield/

It actually gets worse...

...wait for it...


 

i never thought these shills would go this low..haha

Bless your heart, are you really this stupid or intentionally telling lies?  

May 2014: Darkcoin price jumps on eve of Masternode Ponzi launch - https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/darkcoin-price-skyrockets-eve-masternode-launch/

April 2015: Darkcoin rebrands to Dash - https://www.coinprices.io/articles/darkcoin-rises-rebrands-to-dash

You assert Dash's 2mb blocks "will be implemented without controversy" yet fail to address the specific reason I provided for doubting that, as if you don't even understand what the phrase "quadratic verification times" means.

If Dash were to suddenly gain widespread actual use it would need 2mb blocks, but would not be ready to implement them.

Where is the code and testing for 2mb blocks?  Do you actually think Evan can just find and replace the variable to upgrade?

Where is his solution for quadratic verification?  When will it be tested and ready for production?

What is the point of voting for 2mb blocks and congratulating yourselves about Dash's DGBB when the votes have no meaning other than pure symbolism?

You have conceded the Darkcoin-to-Dash rebrand happened without Masternode voting, but you are so profoundly ignorant of the basic facts you aren't even aware that Masternodes existed long before the rebrand.

How sad that I must inform you about the actual history of the scam coin you are choosing to shill for using fake facts about the rebrand occurring "before masternodes existed."  



So you also believe the Darkcoin-to-Dash rebrand happened before Masternodes existed?  That's adorable!   

I'm going to concur with what MM said, and go one step further. Dash has a real development team who are doing real work to push forward a real change in the usability and decentralization of cryptocurrency (Dash Evolution). For our dev team, it's a matter of priorities. Sure, they could code the 2 MB blocks and spend a few weeks shepherding us through the fork, but why do so when we don't need to? Unlike some coins, who have to adopt tech that they don't need just to get some good press, Dash continues to develop real features that will take us to the top...in the long run.

Yes, if we had implemented 2 MB blocks that same month, we probably would have gotten a little price pump from it. Yes, if we had been the first coin to implement SegWit, we probably would have gotten a little price pump from it. The difference between us and other coins is that when we don't need things, we don't implement them just to get some temporary media attention and price action. From my interactions with the team, they work just as hard today as they did when Dash was $4, and will work just as hard when Dash is $500.

You want short term profits? Find coins that implement features that are unneeded just to get a pump. You want long-term value? You'll find it in Dash.

We don't need 2MB blocks yet, when we do they will be implemented without controversy, unlike other coins that lack governance.

Darkcoin was re-branded to Dash before masternodes (voting) existed, we had a full debate about it though.

I have to agree with the others that your level of trolling has declined in recent months, please get it together. We need you at your best to keep the thread bumped and create controversy so we can remain the number one ANN thread on BTCtalk.  

Dash Gets Theatrical With Circus City Sponsorship


The Dash network is set to fund a sponsorship for Circus City, the first cryptocurrency-sponsored major cultural and artistic event in the United Kingdom.

Circus City is a circus and performance arts festival occurring in Bristol every other year. The Dash treasury proposal will be used to provide an exclusive sponsorship, and Dash branding will be on banners, pamphlets, intro videos, and other promotional material for the festival, bringing digital cash to an entirely new audience...

https://www.dashforcenews.com/dash-gets-theatrical-with-circus-city-sponsorship/

The Dash Network is set to fund the creation of two separate Ripple gateways, one on GateHub and one open-source.

The Ripple Consensus Ledger is a cryptocurrency network that allows for the rapid and seamless exchange of currencies across the network via gateways. These new proposals would integrate Dash, one into the GateHub major gateway, and the other open source. According to Andriy Khavryuchenko, project lead for the open source gateway, both proposals work well in tandem:

What is about Dash again? Impossible to hold value while BTC rises?Tell me its impossible? If its impossible for dash to rise while bt rise then we should warn investitors that Dash will never gain value against btc that its just a btc dependant for forever and should go down while btc rises and that doesnt have its own value to maintain and that will never surpass btc in terms of marketcap because cannot stand against btc rather than fall down like a piece of shit copycoin!
Fuck off Dash you are still premature and just too many marketing words and nothing more!

That's nice. 

The point is Dash's future emission and branding are no more fixed than Darkcoin's were.  That is to say, not at all.

Darkcoin's emission was changed on Evan's whim.

Then Darkcoin's brand was changed on Evan's whim.

No Masternode voting was involved.  No wonder you have to fling poo at Decred's scrupulously ethical blockchain democracy.   

It's actually an example of what an incoherent random mess looks like and of how to impose the most adverse of couplings at the wrong place in the design/development cycle, just so you've got "something to sell".

I suppose we could test it out though. Try painting an online Picasso by letting everyone vote on where the next pixel goes. Could be interesting. At least it would be democratic !

The masternodes "voted" for 2MB blocks, yet there is still no fix for the quadratic verification issue and thus the change hasn't been coded/tested/deployed.

Dash's "vote" for 2MB was merely an exercise in Governance Theater, with no actual purpose other than a creating a brief opportunity to sneer at Bitcoin and pump Dash as a viable alternative.

The Masternodes did *NOT* vote on the Darkcoin to Dash rebrand.  It was done via decree by the cargo cult's High Priest, not proven stakeholders.

This:
https://www.dash.org/news/rebranding-to-dash/
is an example of dictatorial executive fiat, not on-chain governance.

This:
https://voting.decred.org/
is what actual blockchain democracy looks like.

looking forward to evolution glad to see dash has broken its 100$ barrier again lets go to the 200$ mark 

Psssst I tell you a secret: He is fully fluffycated and became hated and ignored in his home coin thread lately.
Seriously one has to wonder what's up with those monero ppl this days.
After years of attacking other altcoins they now switch to scam each other and are proud about it.
There are some few very weird ppl in that community.

Infringing on the Dash brand name ?

Beta tester needed for CoinDash - Into the future of Trading!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/beta-tester-needed-for-coindash-into-the-future-of-trading-1942891

You are definetly tired  . Go home iCE