How many algos are even needed ?
It depends on what you "need them" for. If you want to take a risk in a single-point-of-failure approach, you can. If you want to improve your security, you can also. If you want to use the same tech as other coins, you can. If you want to differentiate yourself, you can also.
what i meant was you can simply comment out some of the code in the hashing algo function and it still hashes and faster there for giving you a potential advantage
and there for maybe someone already knew this ? its commented in much of the source code i have no doubt this coin was based on.
releasing a miner that is doing extra *useless work to me is a scammy method of screwing the public flash miners
while you flash mine with a massive advantage.. jeez guys do you even read the shit that rolls out of your mouths ? seriously
one guy just said the miner was was faaaaaaaar slower at launch and history has shown us that is a common method of fucking scamming gullable idiot fanboys.
most of you clearly don't have the faintest clue what stunts these coin cloners pull ..i do, i have been here for ages exposing them.
want me to run a few experiments and prove it ? already did a million times on similar coins and can easily do it for this one too.
and white papers are propaganda.. i don't read that crap, i look at the facts like source code ..it don't lie.
all i had to do is look at what hashing algo's were used on page 1..
ya ya argue lip me off then later come back and say ..ohhh yeah he's right afterwards right ? (like on the previous page)
knee jerk defensive reactions from people who don't know what their talking about..
if i have to go grab the source code and compare and take screenshots jamming it down your throats i am not going to be amused.
i know you all love being argumentative fanboys but gimme a break.
so all your oppinion is based on the algos that darkcoin uses? you didn't even bother to check the commits page on github, to see all the other changes eddufield did? (hint: https://github.com/evan82/darkcoin/commits/master)
you base your accusations on the sourcecode which you clearly never read .... WOW ! GREAT RESPECT !
ahh see.. the he's right and push another angle quick routine.. you know i can prove what i am saying so you guys are bobbing and weaving.
suggestion: maybe cut the bs ?
you are all making wild and often false claims about this coin and I HAVE EVERY RIGHT to post proof PROVING your full of shit .
and whether my grammar is not up to your quality liking or not i really seriously could net conceivably care less whiny little grammar nazi's.
i will agree with the guy who just said it's not about the coin clone it's about marketing.. agreed and all these other coins have fancy marketing teams for their clones too lol
AKA: people to spread propaganda and lure in new users using any means necessary.
Oh and by the way that is complete bs.. we don't need any marketing teams what we need is a product that sells it self like Bitcoin itself did.
Not sure how you all survive on such a steady diet of delusional blind fanboyism eating what ever some coin cloner feeds you.
changes eddufield did?
that is like saying the dummy services coin cloners add after the fact to their coins make them legit lol
bah i give up you people are clueless.. i may post pics later though if i get motivated, you'll just play games more though so whats the point ?
Don't drink the Koolaid or put the Nike's on guys
Oh and did anyone care to address my comment about how ASIC resistant is mentioned but Botnet rape is ignored ?
what ever.. what a joke lol
