Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6659. (Read 9724017 times)

Pulled all my sell orders off of Cryptsy as I do believe this coin has a valid place in the market (though I had set the order at a very reasonable rate). I suggest you all do the same

Whenever you send coins, it sends all the coins in the input/s given, sending your change to a new address. The point of this is so that an attacker cannot re-broadcast a valid transaction extra times to cause it to be executed multiple times, emptying an address. As the input is one particular output, and it is fully consumed when spent, any attempts to re-broadcast would only be referring to no longer redeemable inputs, and would be rejected.

core clock between 1050 and 1150, mem clock 1250, 256 worksize, -g 2, --lookup-gap 2, intensity 13 will get you running around 2.1Mh/s completely stable.

I finally got a chance to send myself some coin using the new darksend.  It really is elequent!  So simple, so clean, It's pure genius!



You can see here, I sent myself 5.25 coins.  One of the 3 transactions in the first table belongs to me.  Then below, you can see my 5.25 coin going to the address I sent it (well, actually that's not the address I sent it to,it's a type of dummy address, I'm guessing), and the 4.749 is my change, that came back to me minus .001 transaction fee (again with some kind of dummy address).  I don't understand how these "dummy addresses" work, or if they're what I think they are?  I'm wondering if our wallets create two types of addresses that correlate to each other?  It's taking me a while to learn this, LOL

From my wallet, it all looks normal, it's all done automatically.  Just beautiful!  None of the links in explorer actually have any wallet addresses, that is the kind that start with X.  I'm not sure if our wallets create hidden addresses now or what?  Regardless, this is a thing of beauty, truly!

What would you suggest running on a 7970?

Unfortunately, you've reached the end of my limited knowledge.

HELP CHAOSiTEC!

Unfortunately, you've reached the end of my limited knowledge.

HELP CHAOSiTEC!

What would you suggest running on a 7970?

I edited above:


Oh, camosoul, did you put the contents of the ADL_SDK, downloaded from AMD, into the same named folder of the sgminer?

You only need some of the files, but I just dump 'em all in there

Yes, either you have to lower your thread concurrency or something else (forgot which input is used to multiply with TC) anyway, it's usually the TC that you have to lower   Also, don't put your -I up as high as you can because it will actually give you more invalids and slow down your hash.  You need to experiment for the best -I settings.

your creating a work order that is larger than your avail memory on your gfx card, try decreasing work size and the other one with big number, cant remember what its called now lol

Anybody got a clue what to do about this?

your creating a work order that is larger than your avail memory on your gfx card, try decreasing work size and the other one with big number, cant remember what its called now lol

Anybody got a clue what to do about this?

[01:31:32] Started sgminer 4.1.0-85-gccc7d
[01:31:32] ADL found less devices than opencl!
[01:31:32] There is possibly more than one display attached to a GPU
[01:31:32] Use the gpu map feature to reliably map OpenCL to ADL
[01:31:32] WARNING: Number of OpenCL and ADL devices did not match!
[01:31:32] Hardware monitoring may NOT match up with devices!
[01:31:32] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[01:31:32] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!
[01:31:32] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[01:31:32] Maximum buffer memory device 0 supports says 598474752
[01:31:32] Your scrypt settings come to 838860800
[01:31:32] Error -61: clCreateBuffer (padbuffer8), decrease TC or increase LG
[01:31:32] Failed to init GPU thread 0, disabling device 0
[01:31:32] Restarting the GPU from the menu will not fix this.
[01:31:32] Try restarting sgminer.
Press enter to continue:

All these exchanges who have voting (mintpal, now cryptsy, etc) or who ask for money/coins to add your crypto to their site, they're simply exploiting the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Why would a developer have to pay an exchange who will make money with trades? Cause they created a shitcoin and are desperate for any occasion which will cause a rise in value. Exchanges know there are so many shitcoins so they know they can exploit the weak ones.

Look at Cryptsy as far ago as yesterday. They saw the potential with coin votes from Mintpal and added it. And they're in NO hurry to add the coin, they're milking the competition for all it's worth. From the TOP10 coins in the votes on cryptsy.com/coinvotes they made 35.52 BTC , that's 22 555 $ , 22 thousand dollars for letting retards with worthless coins fight it out. Look at the top 2 for an example of utter garbage coins.

Dark so far has not been pressured into paying anyone for anything, has slowly gained followers and is gaining momentum everyday. We're on almost all the biggest crypto exchanges by merit alone. BTC38 and BTER will come very soon and the timing will coincide with a few more betas and maybe a main release of Darksend.

I'm glad the devs aren't paying their way up top , that would not be true to the real value offered by Darkcoin and they know it. We have a solid foundation and with every step forward, price is rising and recognition is rising as well.

I am not Dorian Nakamoto.