Edit : didn't saw, but also at cryptsy and ccex....
Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6774. (Read 9723522 times)
February 25, 2014, 10:42:07 PM
Anddddd, ...... another dump (little amount this time) at the same time at polo and mintpal...
Edit : didn't saw, but also at cryptsy and ccex....
Edit : didn't saw, but also at cryptsy and ccex....
February 25, 2014, 10:38:30 PM
Yes indeed, and lets bring up this price to the moon. I think its time to take over litecoin fellas!
February 25, 2014, 10:37:38 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
You would use darksend addr amount, then there will be another command to get the last darksend txid
Would accepting payments now without darksend be the same as taking api payments for litecoin?
February 25, 2014, 10:33:59 PM
Alright, emails are finally working on the official pool. Everyone come join and let's take the hashing power away from coinmine.
February 25, 2014, 10:32:26 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
Don't forget to ask for help in Stackoverflow.
February 25, 2014, 10:31:04 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
You would use darksend addr amount, then there will be another command to get the last darksend txid
is there anything i can read on taking darkcoin API payments now with out darksend?
February 25, 2014, 10:30:45 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
February 25, 2014, 10:27:47 PM
Hi guys,
It seems like I might have come to this thread at wrong time. Hope the coin is ok!
Just dropping by to let you guys know that its official: https://twitter.com/LazyCoins
You're one of the first coins we have accepted at our exchange to be traded at launch, which will probably be the biggest launch for any altcoins exchange yet. Since our announcement 7 days ago we have over a 1000 followers and 22 altcoins aceepted. We are working hard to launch beta soon. So for ETA and updates please follow us https://twitter.com/LazyCoins. Retweet and show your support!
DRK will be paired with ltc, btc and doge
Best of Luck Guys!
It seems like I might have come to this thread at wrong time. Hope the coin is ok!
Just dropping by to let you guys know that its official: https://twitter.com/LazyCoins
You're one of the first coins we have accepted at our exchange to be traded at launch, which will probably be the biggest launch for any altcoins exchange yet. Since our announcement 7 days ago we have over a 1000 followers and 22 altcoins aceepted. We are working hard to launch beta soon. So for ETA and updates please follow us https://twitter.com/LazyCoins. Retweet and show your support!
DRK will be paired with ltc, btc and doge
Best of Luck Guys!
February 25, 2014, 10:26:44 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
You would use darksend addr amount, then there will be another command to get the last darksend txid
February 25, 2014, 10:16:32 PM
LISTEN UP
The coinmine pool at https://www2.coinmine.pl/drk/index.php has 80% of the total hashrate
80% of total hashrate!
We absolutely need to spread out the power to other pools, look at the list on www.darkcoin.io or all the new pools people are posting and change your miners. To the official pool at least which the devs control.
I don't want to spread FUD and accusations but there has been a lot of weird stuff happening these days. Part of it can be explained by the C-CEX.com hacks which put a ton of DRK on the market to be dumped on poloniex. But maybe, just maybe, the biggest pool is authoring double spends and sending fake DRK to be dumped. I'm very sorry to even bring this up if it's false and I mean no offense but it's something to consider. Someone may be draining DRK for all it's worth. Or someone (competitor?) may be intentionally investing in bringing down DRK as well but at least we can power through that.
If the coinmine pool owner reads this, please respond in any way possible, no offense was meant.
One thing is for sure, DRK is under attack by someone who wants to A) Destroy it and bring the price down while they bring out their competitor B) Lower the price insanely and then buy it all up, which makes no sense since they already have tons of coins.
The coinmine pool at https://www2.coinmine.pl/drk/index.php has 80% of the total hashrate
80% of total hashrate!
We absolutely need to spread out the power to other pools, look at the list on www.darkcoin.io or all the new pools people are posting and change your miners. To the official pool at least which the devs control.
I don't want to spread FUD and accusations but there has been a lot of weird stuff happening these days. Part of it can be explained by the C-CEX.com hacks which put a ton of DRK on the market to be dumped on poloniex. But maybe, just maybe, the biggest pool is authoring double spends and sending fake DRK to be dumped. I'm very sorry to even bring this up if it's false and I mean no offense but it's something to consider. Someone may be draining DRK for all it's worth. Or someone (competitor?) may be intentionally investing in bringing down DRK as well but at least we can power through that.
If the coinmine pool owner reads this, please respond in any way possible, no offense was meant.
One thing is for sure, DRK is under attack by someone who wants to A) Destroy it and bring the price down while they bring out their competitor B) Lower the price insanely and then buy it all up, which makes no sense since they already have tons of coins.
Yeah, I'm not pointing fingers either, but someone is seriously manipulating this coin, and its getting real old real fast. I don't know how to get to the bottom of this, but it looks really bad when the price is all over the place like it has been. Having 80% of the hashrate in one pool is awful damn suspicious. I'll just leave it at that.
as I have been pointing before, someone is having a fresh daily source of almost free coins, I think is someone manipulating the mining network, thats why a lot of people are having orphan blocks and yeah a pool controlling 80% of hashrate can do this with other separate entities so is not that obvious. I think what happened on C-Cex is only correlated for the massive pump and 1 dump on poloniex but I have witnessed and participating in the buying of 14 more dumps in the .0010, .0009 and now .0005. The number the dumper chooses is correlated with the btc bounty, if someone putts an ammount above 20 btc in .0005(buy order) the guy will sell at that price.
The first dump is as old as when you guys reached the .0024 level for the first time, we just didn't notice them bc the market recuperates really fast(les than 3 mins) at those crazy prices.
if I had to guess, what hapened on c-cex had something to do with XCP hacker or the poloniex owner destroying competition bc he was attacked before with this bug and therefore familiar with it, steal from competition and launder your money in your exchange.
2. what is happening now with pools will have to do with the dev or someone in his team or someone found a way to use litecoin asics on dark and is exploting this ussing different users and solo mining to hide this.
basically the dumper can withdraw easily BTC from poloniex but not crypsy or C-cex, so the guys that buy at those cheap levels are laundering his btc by selling them on crypsy and rebuying on polo.
all theory......
February 25, 2014, 10:14:29 PM
Hello I am developing a site that takes darksend payments through API. I was wondering how this process would be different then taking payments the same way with btc? Would it be different to accept DRK through darksend as far as API goes?
February 25, 2014, 10:14:19 PM
Hey Eduffield, how is the new website coming along? (also you guys should update the exchange list on darkcoin.io, we still only have 3!)
Here's the work in progress, any ideas would be greatly appreciated: http://darkcoin.us/io/
What should be on the homepage? We have 5 slots to fill.
Anyone have good ideas for stock photos for the various pages?
Starting to look good. If you're going with the gray overall theme, I'd suggest reconsidering this coin sigi made
Looks really good and is better suited to be an icon at small sizes as well.
edit: I'd also pay a bit to have the website made I imagine you've hired someone?
This is my favorite so far. This is the most refined, professional look yet. Contrary to what someone else was saying above, I think we need to keep trying to make the design better and better. The one used looks good right now, but it's still a little amateur hour imo.
February 25, 2014, 10:13:39 PM
The thing is that only 17% is ALOT. For perspective, 17% of bitcoin is well over one billion dollars at the current price. In other words, my concern is more whether the total cap really 10.5M instead of the 84M advertised? If its 84M, then those coins mined in the first 24 hours are much less significant. Fair distribution is important to the success of a coin, or else Drk will just be replaced by the next coin that is able to copy its features.
Yes, and the next coin will be replaced by the next one until everyone and their uncles have managed to instamine the launch. Only then everyone can be happy.
Is there a way to see the largest transactions on the Dark explorer like with Bitcoin (https://blockchain.info/largest-recent-transactions)?
February 25, 2014, 10:02:08 PM
The thing is that only 17% is ALOT. For perspective, 17% of bitcoin is well over one billion dollars at the current price. In other words, my concern is more whether the total cap really 10.5M instead of the 84M advertised? If its 84M, then those coins mined in the first 24 hours are much less significant. Fair distribution is important to the success of a coin, or else Drk will just be replaced by the next coin that is able to copy its features.
Yes, and the next coin will be replaced by the next one until everyone and their uncles have managed to instamine the launch. Only then everyone can be happy.
February 25, 2014, 09:57:28 PM
Yep Poloniex is down - I swear Dark is going to overtake LTC/BTC - The exchanges cant even take the power of Dark haha
February 25, 2014, 09:53:23 PM
and
https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_drk
down again !?
strange things are happening out there these days …>>
https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_drk
down again !?
strange things are happening out there these days …>>
February 25, 2014, 09:48:54 PM
I can tell you that we have nowhere near that many coins. And between the two of us we gave away close to 80,000 DRK in the first week or two. We are not hoarding coins, and there are people here that can stipulate that I sold ten of thousands at or below $0.02. I have sold and given away more coins than I now have, and yes I was mining on the first day right after it was made public, using Amazon EC2 servers.
We both gave away alot of coins to get people interested, and we didnt even PRE-MINE, we just wanted the coin to succeed.
If we were just looking for a quick buck and had 1.8 Million coins, or anywhere close to that, we would have sold at $1 and been very happy, but that is not why we made this coin.
We both gave away alot of coins to get people interested, and we didnt even PRE-MINE, we just wanted the coin to succeed.
If we were just looking for a quick buck and had 1.8 Million coins, or anywhere close to that, we would have sold at $1 and been very happy, but that is not why we made this coin.
Let me go yell at satoshi nakamoto who holds around 8% of all bitcoins.
I don't see why someone stating facts would make you reach the conclusion that they are greedy. I hope the dev can elaborate on the total coin cap. If it indeed can only reach a max of 10.5M then those coins mined in the first 24 hours have a much bigger piece of the pie and make the distribution unfair. I agree that early adopters should have an advantage, but 17% of all coins? How many of those are the Dev's? Sounds like a way to get around pre-mining to me. Of course I hope that is not the case because I did invest some in this coin as well and would like to see it succeed in its goal for complete anonymity. But because someone asks for transparency does not make one greedy.
The thing is that only 17% is ALOT. For perspective, 17% of bitcoin is well over one billion dollars at the current price. In other words, my concern is more whether the total cap really 10.5M instead of the 84M advertised? If its 84M, then those coins mined in the first 24 hours are much less significant. Fair distribution is important to the success of a coin, or else Drk will just be replaced by the next coin that is able to copy its features.
The final number or close to it should definitely be calculated and included as an official number. The final number doesn't matter as long as it's clearly indicated. The 84 million figure should most likely be removed and maybe the code cleaned up as well one last time before the darksend fork.
February 25, 2014, 09:44:22 PM
Reposting:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIy2Fw9xjuk
he is just so good !
18:25 min
Quote:
"It has to be Anonymity for everyone, by default, always on, can not turn it off, do not know it is there …. that would be my goal (for a currency) …! "
"is our current group of developers able to do things like that ….."
Are we ? Are they ? Is this ??
zerocoin:
"has some issues"
46:40 - 48:50
Wallet Quote:
"wallets remixing … any transaction you do is automatically remixed on any user wallet"
interesting thought!
DRK not mentioned !
video is from 14th Jan 2014
any thoughts …>>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIy2Fw9xjuk
he is just so good !
18:25 min
Quote:
"It has to be Anonymity for everyone, by default, always on, can not turn it off, do not know it is there …. that would be my goal (for a currency) …! "
"is our current group of developers able to do things like that ….."
Are we ? Are they ? Is this ??
zerocoin:
"has some issues"
46:40 - 48:50
Wallet Quote:
"wallets remixing … any transaction you do is automatically remixed on any user wallet"
interesting thought!
DRK not mentioned !
video is from 14th Jan 2014
any thoughts …>>>
February 25, 2014, 09:42:15 PM
Donations to a crypto-hobo are welcomed and GREATLY appreciated. Darkcoin wallet addy is Xq5o7AGBau1bL59fDuJpgcU6XQ6Fr6iHRm. Thank you for your time, and love the coin. Can't wait to see it reach btc and ltc heights 
February 25, 2014, 09:39:05 PM
"The world's first coin where you can't join any mining pool because they say they'll send you an email and never do."
Most accurate slogan.
Most accurate slogan.
That's extremely witty. How long did you come up with that one?
Jump to: