Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6827. (Read 9723508 times)

Still? Please use p2p from now on so you aren't at the mercy of these pool operators.

What config do you use for darkcoin?

Lim my biggest issue is on my moniter (brighter) settings you can barely read the submit button on the post. My suggestion...keep the top banner as is, but make a shade of blue that contratsts with text more visibly. It's not easy to get this right, and I know for darkcoin you wanna keep the tone, just need to get things more readable is all. Regardless keep up the great work, we are all in this as a team, feedback is important

Who just saw the huge dump and sell wall on c-cex. The cunt dumped from 23 down to 198 and put a 17btc sell wall at 20. Very annoying bullshit.

Too late

Anyway, I'll do it again if you have the gpu-miner and then do a fresh install:)

I got an error with the apt-get install command: a file not found

I get where you're coming from and I appreciate the feedback. I have to take everyone's feedback into consideration and it's not uncommon to have at least a fair % of people who aren't pleased with a given design. Having said that, if the theme is just painful to read for a reasonable subset of users, it needs to be changed. I like to do things democratically so maybe we can do up a few prototypes and call a vote if we can't sufficiently improve the existing one.

If you give your address, I'd like to send a little DRK your way for your time and effort.

I get where you're coming from and I appreciate the feedback. I have to take everyone's feedback into consideration and it's not uncommon to have at least a fair % of people who aren't pleased with a given design. Having said that, if the theme is just painful to read for a reasonable subset of users, it needs to be changed. I like to do things democratically so maybe we can do up a few prototypes and call a vote if we can't sufficiently improve the existing one.

I get where you're coming from and I appreciate the feedback. I have to take everyone's feedback into consideration and it's not uncommon to have at least a fair % of people who aren't pleased with a given design. Having said that, if the theme is just painful to read for a reasonable subset of users, it needs to be changed. I like to do things democratically so maybe we can do up a few prototypes and call a vote if we can't sufficiently improve the existing one.

I apologize, I don't mean to be so harsh.  I understand you're volunteering your time and it really is appreciated.  You've created some beautiful work in this thread.

In short, dark color schemes just don't work for my eyes and the majority of people.  I know you've worked hard on it and the header is gorgeous, but I honestly feel dark color schemes will turn many away

I have some concerns about this.

First if this is intedendet to be the official DRK logo: A Logo should always be highly stylized. The more stylised the logo is the more can it be used on all scenarios.
What we got here is a artificial Photo of a coin. It has a texture, lens flare and shadowing on it.
Therefore it is not stylized and will cause problems.

First problem is that it cant be vectorized. This means you will loose detail on small scales as of small "DRK accepted here"-Buttons and will lead in less recognizability. In the need of a big scale the coin gets coarse, because the source texture will lack in detail.
Second problem is you cant use it for any material layer. For example making a real coin out of it. What you basically do is putting a metal texture image on a metal textured real coin. This will result in an ugly coin.
The same goes for the lens flare on the top of the 'D' and all kinds of shadowing in the image.

Dont get me wrong, the Coin is looking cool in the image, you did a good job there. But its hardly usable as a logo or as raw data for further production.

My second concern is the "stabilizer" (I dont know what they are called, but often they are described as making the currency logo "more stable" looking e.g. $€BTC) on the D. It goes down. Down. Why down? Is the implication of this that the currency is going down soon? Better make that thing going up

Who just saw the huge dump and sell wall on c-cex. The cunt dumped from 23 down to 198 and put a 17btc sell wall at 20. Very annoying bullshit.

Can I ask that you please be a bit more constructive, because I've actively addressed people's criticisms, fixed all the glaring RES stylesheet issues, basically done everything people have asked, and received a lot of positive feedback from people who were previously complaining (mostly about RES specific problems that weren't visible on my end at the time, which have since been fixed). If you still have a problem with it, I'm as open to changing things as I've always been. I'm putting my own time into this for the community, after all. You just need to be specific about the problem you're having. It's like filing a bug report -- if you don't give specifics, it's hard for the dev to address the problem.

I'm also a coder who uses dark colour schemes so I know what works for me, but I only have my own eyes to go by, so if the scheme doesn't agree with your eyes I need you to be specific about the what & why.

Oh screwballs, that's for the cpu miner, lOL, hold on, I'll get the right one...

Just a quick cut and paste, on my Ubuntu, this is what I do for the latest version:

sudo apt-get update

sudo apt-get install -y build-essential m4 libssl-dev libdb++-dev libboost-all-dev libminiupnpc-dev git automake libcurl4-openssl-dev

sudo git clone https://github.com/elmad/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes

cd darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes

sudo chmod +x autogen.sh

sudo ./autogen.sh
Lol, too late

I was thinking the name was strange but...

sudo ./configure CFLAGS="-O3 -march=native"

sudo make


And this is how I start it:

sudo ./minerd -a X11 -o stratum+tcp://drk.lotterymining.com:4444 -u Me.Worker -p Password

Can you explain what to do to install it on bamt/linux?

It just compiled it, and it looks to be working!

I'm not sure if the feedback im getting from sgminer is correct, but the pool is saying that my working is going at 5,400 kh/s Thats with two 7950's and one R280.  I'm sure my setting, threads etc are far from optimal.

sgminer version 4.0.0 - Started: [2014-02-15 02:39:43]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):5.488M (avg):5.414Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.0/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 5  LW: 151  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to (null) (stratum) diff 0 as user xxxx
Block: 835147cb...  Diff:23  Started: [02:45:08]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:                | 2.028M/2.053Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:13
 GPU 1:                | 1.672M/1.689Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:20
 GPU 2:                | 1.715M/1.733Mh/s | R:  2.9% HW:0 WU:0.0/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[02:43:32] Accepted 0e000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 1 at (null)
[02:43:42] Accepted 6a000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:43:51] Network diff set to 23
[02:43:51] Stratum from (null) detected new block
[02:44:07] Network diff set to 23
[02:44:07] Stratum from (null) detected new block
[02:44:10] Accepted 35000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 2 at (null)
[02:44:18] Accepted 3e000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 2 at (null)
[02:44:21] Accepted 4a000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 1 at (null)
[02:44:25] Accepted 39000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 1 at (null)
[02:44:28] Accepted 57000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 1 at (null)
[02:44:28] Accepted 22000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:44:30] Accepted 09000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:44:34] Accepted 6a000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 1 at (null)
[02:44:41] Accepted 1a000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:44:50] Accepted 5f000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:44:50] Accepted 67000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)
[02:44:53] Accepted 27000000 Diff 0/0 GPU 0 at (null)

Thanks to all involed, I'll be sending some coins!

Edit: Yeah, getting about 5.5Mh/s right now with my three cards.  But I noticed I'm only pulling about 450W at the wall, where as I normally pull about 800W, so I'm sure it can go even faster.