Author

Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency - page 6823. (Read 9723508 times)

member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Hmm.
What normal hashrate for 280x, 270x and 7850?
On 280x i have 1.8mh
270x - 1.176mh
7850 - 1.050mh

Its normal?

on my 280x i get 2.18 mhash

Care to share your conf settings? Im running at approx 1800 khash per r9 280x
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
DRK COIN to brighten our LIFE.

A DARKCOIN Charity Foundation for needy children.  Grin

DONATION ADDRESS (DRK): XifqN6SNh4JngM9MqYbS1e77tAmoerQSaE

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/address/XifqN6SNh4JngM9MqYbS1e77tAmoerQSaE
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 100
The Future Of Work
Other ideas?

I’m open to ideas on how to provide the best security to the network. I would love to hear what people have in mind.
How about adding an option for adding decoy transactions?

Sometimes coinjoins can be picked apart just by looking at what adds up. This was painfully obvious on the darksend testnet the other day, as I remember seeing darksend transactions like Inputs: 500, 5 Outputs: 400, 100, 4, 1 where there's only one possible solution of who sent what.

One could easily construct decoy transactions to specifically add up to the amounts of the legit transaction. For example:
Intended transaction:
Input: 100
Output: 20, 80(change)
Decoy transaction:
Input: 500
Output: 10, 90, 50, 50, 35, 65, 95, 5, 100(all sent to change addresses)

If that decoy transaction is coinjoined with the intended transaction, there becomes 5 extra possibilities of where the 100 was sent to even if no transactions by others help mask it

Also, use more inputs than necessary, and use several change addresses instead of just one to help mask the intentions, and also having more and smaller outputs causes it to be more likely that they can be useful to help mask other transactions joined with them.

The testing we did was just a test of the transaction pooling and remote signing of inputs, not a test of anonymity (good eye though checking that out). One of the next tests we should have that working.

Here’s the plan for anonymizing amounts if anyone is interested:

DarkSend anonymizes unique amounts like 15.15 by using “denominations” of currency in the different transaction pools available. These denominations come in the amounts of 5000, 1000, 500, 100, 50, 20, 5, 1, .50, .25, .10, .05, and .01. For example a payment of 15.15 would be broken down and submitted to the following transaction pools:

Submit payment for 10DRK to addr Xyz using pool 10  (in pool 10 ALL outputs are for 10DRK)
Submit payment for 5DRK to addr Xyz   using pool 5     (in pool 5 ALL outputs are for 5DRK)
Submit payment for 0.10DRK to addr Xyz   using pool .10
Submit payment for 0.05DRK to addr Xyz   using pool .05

The four payments total 15.15, just like paying in cash, except you have no idea who paid you.

Users receiving anonymous payments will then receive separate out of order payments for various amounts adding up to the total amount they were intending on receiving.  

With this methodology, payments could be as granular as 0.01, this could be changed in the future if the currency becomes more valuable by adding smaller denominations.  

If you leave the smaller units out, and they are used all the time, won't that be a weak link from which you can figure out where the transactions came from?
phm
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 110
DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO
Anyone can help with mining on 7950s?

My 7850 in my desktop can mine no problem using it's standard values used for scrypt mining, but the 7950s only return HW errors. I've been trying for two days. I've tried no parameters at all in the BAT file, multiple TCs and multiple values of every other variable imaginable. I've also tried underclocking, limiting it to just one GPU to see if I could get something working, upgrading drivers, downgrading drivers, etc. etc. Am I missing something? If someone can help, I'll tip you something. Probably in LTC since I don't have any DRK. Feel free to PM me if you'd like.

This is very strange. Did you try the new miner posted there: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-sph-sgminer-multi-coin-multi-algorithm-gpu-miner-added-marucoin-475795 ? Remember to add -k darkcoin with this one.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Is this SHA? Difficulty is 309. If this is scrypt then that is crazy!
phm
full member
Activity: 378
Merit: 110
DATABLOCKCHAIN.IO SALE IS LIVE | MVP @ DBC.IO

Thanks but I've already have DRK. (and don't want to sell one!!)
I'm searching BTC at the price of coinbase : Buy Price $575.03   Sell Price $571
I can go 585 for one.


How about bitcurex.com? It's a Polish exchange, but they also have BTC/EUR market. I sold a dozen of BTC there, everything without problems. They don't have any complicated identity verification procedures, at least they didn't when I registered.
full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Quote

Ok a few far fetched tries:

-try setting the shader count in case it is misdetecting them (?) with --shaders XXXX (numbers of shaders on your card)

-try tc value of 1, then 2, then 4, 8, 16, 32 etc (I know it sounds funny but try it),

-reduce intensity from 13 to something less.

-try one gpu at a time

-delete the .bin files

.bin files have been getting deleted each time I try something new. Ran with just the shaders option (1792) and intensity 8 (giving only 50kh/s), lowered tc to 1......nothing works for whatever reason. Redownloaded the miner and started from scratch. Copied the miner from my working computer, still nothing but hw errors.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
Other ideas?

I’m open to ideas on how to provide the best security to the network. I would love to hear what people have in mind.
How about adding an option for adding decoy transactions?

Sometimes coinjoins can be picked apart just by looking at what adds up. This was painfully obvious on the darksend testnet the other day, as I remember seeing darksend transactions like Inputs: 500, 5 Outputs: 400, 100, 4, 1 where there's only one possible solution of who sent what.

One could easily construct decoy transactions to specifically add up to the amounts of the legit transaction. For example:
Intended transaction:
Input: 100
Output: 20, 80(change)
Decoy transaction:
Input: 500
Output: 10, 90, 50, 50, 35, 65, 95, 5, 100(all sent to change addresses)

If that decoy transaction is coinjoined with the intended transaction, there becomes 5 extra possibilities of where the 100 was sent to even if no transactions by others help mask it

Also, use more inputs than necessary, and use several change addresses instead of just one to help mask the intentions, and also having more and smaller outputs causes it to be more likely that they can be useful to help mask other transactions joined with them.

The testing we did was just a test of the transaction pooling and remote signing of inputs, not a test of anonymity (good eye though checking that out). One of the next tests we should have that working.

Here’s the plan for anonymizing amounts if anyone is interested:

DarkSend anonymizes unique amounts like 15.15 by using “denominations” of currency in the different transaction pools available. These denominations come in the amounts of 5000, 1000, 500, 100, 50, 20, 5, 1, .50, .25, .10, .05, and .01. For example a payment of 15.15 would be broken down and submitted to the following transaction pools:

Submit payment for 10DRK to addr Xyz using pool 10  (in pool 10 ALL outputs are for 10DRK)
Submit payment for 5DRK to addr Xyz   using pool 5     (in pool 5 ALL outputs are for 5DRK)
Submit payment for 0.10DRK to addr Xyz   using pool .10
Submit payment for 0.05DRK to addr Xyz   using pool .05

The four payments total 15.15, just like paying in cash, except you have no idea who paid you.

Users receiving anonymous payments will then receive separate out of order payments for various amounts adding up to the total amount they were intending on receiving.  

With this methodology, payments could be as granular as 0.01, this could be changed in the future if the currency becomes more valuable by adding smaller denominations.  
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
Other ideas?

I’m open to ideas on how to provide the best security to the network. I would love to hear what people have in mind.
How about adding an option for adding decoy transactions?

Sometimes coinjoins can be picked apart just by looking at what adds up. This was painfully obvious on the darksend testnet the other day, as I remember seeing darksend transactions like Inputs: 500, 5 Outputs: 400, 100, 4, 1 where there's only one possible solution of who sent what.

One could easily construct decoy transactions to specifically add up to the amounts of the legit transaction. For example:
Intended transaction:
Input: 100
Output: 20, 80(change)
Decoy transaction:
Input: 500
Output: 10, 90, 50, 50, 35, 65, 95, 5, 100(all sent to change addresses)

If that decoy transaction is coinjoined with the intended transaction, there becomes 5 extra possibilities of where the 100 was sent to even if no transactions by others help mask it

Also, use more inputs than necessary, and use several change addresses instead of just one to help mask the intentions, and also having more and smaller outputs causes it to be more likely that they can be useful to help mask other transactions joined with them.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Quote
I've tried everything, but my 7950s won't cooperate. The 7850 in my desktop, which is the one I usually have issues with, is happily mining along.

Hmm.. can't understand what it may be about... what cmd line are you using right now?

I've run without any arguments, I've used --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2, I've changed the g to 1, w to 128, TC from 1792 up to ~24000. I don't think there's much I haven't tried.

The cards mine scrypt, kekkak, scrypt-jane, scrypt n, etc. etc. just fine. Not working with this whatsoever.  Angry

Ok a few far fetched tries:

-try setting the shader count in case it is misdetecting them (?) with --shaders XXXX (numbers of shaders on your card)

-try tc value of 1, then 2, then 4, 8, 16, 32 etc (I know it sounds funny but try it),

-reduce intensity from 13 to something less.

-try one gpu at a time

-delete the .bin files
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Hello,

I've got a question for buying BTC.
As I think it's low, I was thinking in buying BTC with $.

But what I saw in coinbase : Bank Accounts Used to buy and sell bitcoins — U.S. only
Can't use visa credit card there?

I already try the VirWox.. They closed/banned my account directly because I was suspicious lol.. They never told me why, the country?

What?Huh For information I'm French living in Mexico.

How can I do to buy BTC with fiat? I never did it, always haing BTC by mining other coin....

If you do have credit card, i can refer a good merchant.

Yes I have... More than one. also paypal...
full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Quote
I've tried everything, but my 7950s won't cooperate. The 7850 in my desktop, which is the one I usually have issues with, is happily mining along.

Hmm.. can't understand what it may be about... what cmd line are you using right now?

I've run without any arguments, I've used --thread-concurrency 8192 -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2, I've changed the g to 1, w to 128, TC from 1792 up to ~24000. I don't think there's much I haven't tried.

The cards mine scrypt, kekkak, scrypt-jane, scrypt n, etc. etc. just fine. Not working with this whatsoever.  Angry
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 272
1xbit.com
Every clones and even the well established coins would add the darksend tech to theirs . .
Will this anyways affect the growth potential of DRK???


This could potentially be an issue - DRK needs to be established before giving away everything. - or maybe not - it definitely may be an issue.

When megacoin devs introduced Kimoto gravity well, they were in a assumption that their coin would be saved from multipools and later the price would grow consistently. But it ended in great tragedy.
Now many other coins those which implemented KG Well later, reached out with some enormous growth.


Slow and steady wins the race. Sometimes enormous growth leads to enormous dumping & loss of confidence.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Quote
I've tried everything, but my 7950s won't cooperate. The 7850 in my desktop, which is the one I usually have issues with, is happily mining along.

Hmm.. can't understand what it may be about... what cmd line are you using right now?
full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
Hey guys,

I have one 280x runing on cgminer.. but I have a 7970 that's been shut off for that. and it's now not in use.. can I mine with this card only in sgminer?

and if so, what would the config look like to disable card slot 2 (nr 1 in config) and optimised settings?

If you want to just mine with GPU0, just add -d 0 to your bat file.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Pre-sale - March 18
Hey guys,

I have one 280x runing on cgminer.. but I have a 7970 that's been shut off for that. and it's now not in use.. can I mine with this card only in sgminer?

and if so, what would the config look like to disable card slot 2 (nr 1 in config) and optimised settings?
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
Hello,

I've got a question for buying BTC.
As I think it's low, I was thinking in buying BTC with $.

But what I saw in coinbase : Bank Accounts Used to buy and sell bitcoins — U.S. only
Can't use visa credit card there?

I already try the VirWox.. They closed/banned my account directly because I was suspicious lol.. They never told me why, the country?

What?Huh For information I'm French living in Mexico.

How can I do to buy BTC with fiat? I never did it, always haing BTC by mining other coin....

I'll sell you darkcoin via google wallet. pm if interested
Thanks but I've already have DRK. (and don't want to sell one!!)
I'm searching BTC at the price of coinbase : Buy Price $575.03   Sell Price $571
I can go 585 for one.

full member
Activity: 178
Merit: 100
That's peculiar behavior. Can you use display-debug mode to see the debug messages of the hardware errors? Maybe they can give us a clue.


Yeah, tell me about it. I don't know what the problem is. How do you enable debug mode? I'll try it once I get back home.

From inside the program... you press D, and again D(ebug mode on). Then copy paste the HW errors... there's is possibly a log function as well but I've never used it.




Quote
[15:16:00] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
[15:16:00] List of devices:
[15:16:00]      0       Tahiti
[15:16:00]      1       Tahiti
[15:16:00]      2       Tahiti
[15:16:00] Selected 2: Tahiti
[15:16:01] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:16:01] Initialising kernel darkcoin.cl with bitalign, 1 vectors and worksize
 256
[15:16:01] initCl() finished. Found Tahiti
[15:16:01] Init GPU thread 5 GPU 2 virtual GPU 2
[15:16:01] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[15:16:01] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing

[15:16:01] CL Platform version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
[15:16:01] List of devices:
[15:16:01]      0       Tahiti
[15:16:01]      1       Tahiti
[15:16:01]      2       Tahiti
[15:16:01] Selected 2: Tahiti
[15:16:01] Kernel darkcoin is experimental.
[15:16:01] Initialising kernel darkcoin.cl with bitalign, 1 vectors and worksize
 256
[15:16:01] initCl() finished. Found Tahiti
[15:16:01] Probing for an alive pool
[15:16:01] Testing Pool 0
[15:16:01] Pool 0 difficulty changed to 0.008
[15:16:01] Stratum authorisation success for Pool 0
[15:16:01] Pool 0 alive
[15:16:02] Work update message received
[15:16:02] Network diff set to 153
[15:16:02] New block: 00000000004717b2670729c1dc46e3877ed90f1c6925f7520fbaf193af
274392... diff 153
[15:16:06] GPU1: invalid nonce - HW error
[15:16:07] API running in IP access mode on port 4028 (44768)

[15:16:13] GPU0: invalid nonce - HW error
[15:16:13] GPU1: invalid nonce - HW error
[15:16:57] GPU1: invalid nonce - HW error
[15:16:58] Work update message received
[15:16:59] GPU2: invalid nonce - HW error
[15:17:04] Received kill message                    00/m
[15:17:05] Shutdown signal received.
[15:17:05]
Summary of runtime statistics:

[15:17:05] Started at [2014-02-21 15:16:02]
[15:17:05] Pool: stratum+tcp://drk.coinmine.pl:6090
[15:17:05] Runtime: 0 hrs : 1 mins : 3 secs
[15:17:05] Average hashrate: 4.8 Megahash/s
[15:17:05] Solved blocks: 0
[15:17:05] Best share difficulty: 0
[15:17:05] Share submissions: 0
[15:17:05] Accepted shares: 0
[15:17:05] Rejected shares: 0
[15:17:05] Accepted difficulty shares: 0
[15:17:05] Rejected difficulty shares: 0
[15:17:05] Hardware errors: 5
[15:17:05] Utility (accepted shares / min): 0.00/min
[15:17:05] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 0.00/min

[15:17:05] Stale submissions discarded due to new blocks: 0
[15:17:05] Unable to get work from server occasions: 0
[15:17:05] Work items generated locally: 105
[15:17:05] Submitting work remotely delay occasions: 0
[15:17:05] New blocks detected on network: 1

[15:17:05] Summary of per device statistics:

[15:17:05] GPU0                | (5s):1.628M (avg):1.675Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0
.000/m
[15:17:05] GPU1                | (5s):1.614M (avg):1.660Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:3 WU:0
.000/m
[15:17:05] GPU2                | (5s):1.440M (avg):1.481Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:1 WU:0
.000/m
[15:17:05]


I've tried everything, but my 7950s won't cooperate. The 7850 in my desktop, which is the one I usually have issues with, is happily mining along.
sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
CS Student - BC Logo Guy
We need to get on cryptsy. The market manipulation is just ridiculous at this point.

+1

You'll see even more manipulation once it hits CR.
full member
Activity: 228
Merit: 100
Check out my blogpost about Darkcoin here.

Coin Report; Darkcoin

I understand there's more to it. My technichal knowledge kind of sucks, so I will do an update as soon as I've finished my research.
Jump to: