[ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 209.

dbt1033

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: proletariat on January 24, 2017, 07:03:27 PM

Quote from: dbt1033 on January 24, 2017, 06:59:29 PM

Quote from: proletariat on January 24, 2017, 04:12:34 PM

I don't see a reason for jumping into a pool with the most stake miners. I was under impression that it wasn't like POW where the more hash gets the more frequent rewards. in other words no incentive to be in X pool unless the fees are lower. So roi is not taking a hit by spreading tickets to smaller pools. Could be wrong though and if that's the case I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know.

Been on stakepool.eu for a while and have had zero issues so far. noob friendly. Myagui was very patient.

Talking about PoW miners, not PoS (PoA) miners

I know, just making a point and following up on centralization also a couple of posts above, ticket buying was mentioned.

Ahh ok, word.

proletariat

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1005

Quote from: dbt1033 on January 24, 2017, 06:59:29 PM

Quote from: proletariat on January 24, 2017, 04:12:34 PM

I don't see a reason for jumping into a pool with the most stake miners. I was under impression that it wasn't like POW where the more hash gets the more frequent rewards. in other words no incentive to be in X pool unless the fees are lower. So roi is not taking a hit by spreading tickets to smaller pools. Could be wrong though and if that's the case I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know.

Been on stakepool.eu for a while and have had zero issues so far. noob friendly. Myagui was very patient.

Talking about PoW miners, not PoS (PoA) miners

I know, just making a point and following up on centralization also a couple of posts above, ticket buying was mentioned.

dbt1033

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: proletariat on January 24, 2017, 04:12:34 PM

I don't see a reason for jumping into a pool with the most stake miners. I was under impression that it wasn't like POW where the more hash gets the more frequent rewards. in other words no incentive to be in X pool unless the fees are lower. So roi is not taking a hit by spreading tickets to smaller pools. Could be wrong though and if that's the case I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know.

Been on stakepool.eu for a while and have had zero issues so far. noob friendly. Myagui was very patient.

Talking about PoW miners, not PoS (PoA) miners

proletariat

legendary

Activity: 1246

Merit: 1005

I don't see a reason for jumping into a pool with the most stake miners. I was under impression that it wasn't like POW where the more hash gets the more frequent rewards. in other words no incentive to be in X pool unless the fees are lower. So roi is not taking a hit by spreading tickets to smaller pools. Could be wrong though and if that's the case I'd appreciate it if someone would let me know.

Been on stakepool.eu for a while and have had zero issues so far. noob friendly. Myagui was very patient.

dbt1033

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: myagui on January 24, 2017, 02:48:33 PM

Quote from: dbt1033 on January 23, 2017, 07:35:10 PM

Quote from: myagui on January 23, 2017, 04:38:19 PM

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

The problem is that ocminer has the pool source and hasn't release it to the public. If we could convince him to do this, we could have more even hashrate distribution. I reached out to him about this a few days ago but have not gotten a response. If others feel inclined to plead for his mercy, please do so.

I think myself and a few others might join you on your protest. Between us, we have 1000's of tickets.

Maybe I missed some point you were making there dbt1033, but suprnova is one of the smaller PoW pools at the moment, has mostly been well under 15%. Coinmine.pl on the other hand, has usually well over 60% (checking right this instant, dcrstats shows it having 75% of the nethash). There's at least some 7 PoW pools for people to spread out their hashes already, so I don't think that the pool sources are missing generally speaking...

I do appreciate any joiners to this protest though! Wink

He's the one who developed the pool code... Just saying that it's closed source and that if there were more pools maybe ppl would distribute hash more evenly...

But yeah... PoW guys get it together please

solix

full member

Activity: 180

Merit: 100

I know everyone says this about every bag they hold... but Decred might be the most undervalued project and one of my top 3 favorite coins right now. I have spent years crawling crypto projects, codebases, dev teams, etc. If BTC continues to languish, having a drop in replacement for existing BTC APIs and ecosystem tooling with superior hashing, fungibility improvements, LN, well tested code, good GUIs, company (aka. not one man show), established delivery, RFP process, transparency, good governance, democratic DAO hard forking model, "smart" smart contract proposal (I checked out github strawman), you guys know I can keep going.... seems like a no brainer. I'm definitely buying here boys, and I have pretty much every bag and wallet on CMC.

That 2017 roadmap was incredible, and the more I keep up with this project the more I'm impressed.

jwinterm

legendary

Activity: 3136

Merit: 1116

Quote from: myagui on January 24, 2017, 02:48:33 PM

Quote from: dbt1033 on January 23, 2017, 07:35:10 PM

Quote from: myagui on January 23, 2017, 04:38:19 PM

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

The problem is that ocminer has the pool source and hasn't release it to the public. If we could convince him to do this, we could have more even hashrate distribution. I reached out to him about this a few days ago but have not gotten a response. If others feel inclined to plead for his mercy, please do so.

I think myself and a few others might join you on your protest. Between us, we have 1000's of tickets.

Maybe I missed some point you were making there dbt1033, but suprnova is one of the smaller PoW pools at the moment, has mostly been well under 15%. Coinmine.pl on the other hand, has usually well over 60% (checking right this instant, dcrstats shows it having 75% of the nethash). There's at least some 7 PoW pools for people to spread out their hashes already, so I don't think that the pool sources are missing generally speaking...

I do appreciate any joiners to this protest though! Wink

Not mining ATM, but when I get home I'll buy some tickets on stakepool.eu

myagui

legendary

Activity: 1154

Merit: 1001

Quote from: dbt1033 on January 23, 2017, 07:35:10 PM

Quote from: myagui on January 23, 2017, 04:38:19 PM

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

The problem is that ocminer has the pool source and hasn't release it to the public. If we could convince him to do this, we could have more even hashrate distribution. I reached out to him about this a few days ago but have not gotten a response. If others feel inclined to plead for his mercy, please do so.

I think myself and a few others might join you on your protest. Between us, we have 1000's of tickets.

Maybe I missed some point you were making there dbt1033, but suprnova is one of the smaller PoW pools at the moment, has mostly been well under 15%. Coinmine.pl on the other hand, has usually well over 60% (checking right this instant, dcrstats shows it having 75% of the nethash). There's at least some 7 PoW pools for people to spread out their hashes already, so I don't think that the pool sources are missing generally speaking...

I do appreciate any joiners to this protest though! Wink

dbt1033

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: bitcampaign on January 23, 2017, 07:34:39 PM

DECRED added to the site MERCATOX trade, I think this helps to add another trading site for DECRED, at least get a new society or a new trader to DECRED will make it big, just to give you a free VOTE DECRED on this site

https://mercatox.com/coins/list&page=2

The exchange looks good. Thank you for your consideration. However, Decred is already on Poloniex and Bittrex. Would you not consider adding Decred on its obvious merits / existing acknowledgements?

dbt1033

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1000

Quote from: myagui on January 23, 2017, 04:38:19 PM

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

The problem is that ocminer has the pool source and hasn't release it to the public. If we could convince him to do this, we could have more even hashrate distribution. I reached out to him about this a few days ago but have not gotten a response. If others feel inclined to plead for his mercy, please do so.

I think myself and a few others might join you on your protest. Between us, we have 1000's of tickets.

bitcampaign

sr. member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 268

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

DECRED added to the site MERCATOX trade, I think this helps to add another trading site for DECRED, at least get a new society or a new trader to DECRED will make it big, just to give you a free VOTE DECRED on this site

https://mercatox.com/coins/list&page=2

Abou Talha

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: Epsylon3 on January 23, 2017, 06:43:18 PM

Page 353 .. like the number

Freemason ? 353 = 11

Epsylon3

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1082

ccminer/cpuminer developer

Quote from: Scaccomatt0 on January 22, 2017, 05:41:11 AM

Can you please contact yobit to repair DCR wallet?
I can't withdraw coins..

It was never possible, something should be done to prevent this trap

Epsylon3

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1082

ccminer/cpuminer developer

Page 353 .. like the number

^^ tx i hope to see ccminer(s) again, for now mostly claymore users

thefix

legendary

Activity: 1049

Merit: 1001

Quote from: myagui on January 23, 2017, 04:38:19 PM

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

Good call, I switched over to yiimp.ccminer.org

Its a smaller pool that also was created by one of the devs that released an open source Nvidia miner for Decred

Not only do you help a smaller pool but the pool fees go to support the dev and his efforts creating open source miners.

Open source and decentralization is really what this is all about!

Spread the hash!

myagui

legendary

Activity: 1154

Merit: 1001

In protest towards a single PoW pool continuously operating at > 50% of the nethash, I'm switching to votebits 0 for now.
Kindly ask that some PoW miners consider switching to a smaller pool.

Praxis

legendary

Activity: 1118

Merit: 1004

Quote from: Gash on January 23, 2017, 03:49:49 PM

Quote from: Praxis on January 22, 2017, 03:54:58 PM

I can't help you when it comes to Yobit, never used it. I use Poloniex. gtzanap's advice is good imo

Dont use polo, newbie. They will ass bite u and take ur money. Sell tokens to urself, buy them from urself, transact what u have bought only between addresses u control.

Unsubstantiated claim. So far I've had zero problems with Poloniex.

Gash

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 124

Quote from: Praxis on January 22, 2017, 03:54:58 PM

I can't help you when it comes to Yobit, never used it. I use Poloniex. gtzanap's advice is good imo

Dont use polo, newbie. They will ass bite u and take ur money. Sell tokens to urself, buy them from urself, transact what u have bought only between addresses u control.

Penttikuisma

full member

Activity: 157

Merit: 100

Voted

Abou Talha

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Done. I voted 1 and 2. Lightning support and payment.

Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 209. (Read 1201327 times)