[ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 490.

Bitcoin_Delivery

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 500

Quote from: favdesu on February 04, 2016, 09:50:42 AM

Quote from: Bitcoin_Delivery on February 04, 2016, 09:14:22 AM

Nice Java GUI wallet beta released by SG-O, for those that don't like to work in command line

https://forum.decred.org/threads/java-gui-wallet.382/

Some of features implemented are:
- Show balance
- Show a certain number of transactions
- Lock and unlock wallet
- Sending Decreds to an address

This version has only been tested on Windows 7
Tanks to SG-O for the effort, users community rocks and i'm already loving this coin Wink

Source? Github? x Be careful @everyone!

I'm not the developer....
The source refer to a thread on the Official Decred Forum, where is possible to read also a comment from one of Decred developers....
If the source of the wallet was untrastable, i think the developer had locked thread or warned users....instead he say thank to the user for the contribution
By the way...everyone is free to use at his own risk Wink

favdesu

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Bitcoin_Delivery on February 04, 2016, 09:14:22 AM

Nice Java GUI wallet beta released by SG-O, for those that don't like to work in command line

https://forum.decred.org/threads/java-gui-wallet.382/

Some of features implemented are:
- Show balance
- Show a certain number of transactions
- Lock and unlock wallet
- Sending Decreds to an address

This version has only been tested on Windows 7
Tanks to SG-O for the effort, users community rocks and i'm already loving this coin Wink

Source? Github? x Be careful @everyone!

sambiohazard

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 04, 2016, 09:05:11 AM

Quote from: sambiohazard on February 04, 2016, 08:21:04 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 04, 2016, 06:10:08 AM

Quote from: sambiohazard on February 04, 2016, 05:25:47 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 03, 2016, 10:15:16 PM

Quote from: thefix on February 03, 2016, 08:39:00 PM

Very interesting project, unfortunate that Nvidia miners are not getting the same love as AMD

Do we need to crowd fund to get something valid released?

Maybe we just do not have enough Nvidia miners to Justify our existence.

Really, you're not being as picked on as it seems - CUDA is great when it comes to more complex algos, or algos that can benefit from Nvidia-specific optimizations that the compiler is unable to find by itself, but this is not the case for Decred. Really, you're talking about a minor bump I would guess, at most. The algo is dead simple - I've made the miner a few percent faster on AMD - but we're talking single digit percentages... and low digits. The Nvidia OpenCL compiler would really have a hard time fucking it up.

@wolf I tried the cgminer & ccminer both & they give me

970 1.52 GH/s on ccminer & 1.11GH/s on cgminer
750ti 530MH/s in ccminer & 431 MH/s on cgminer

so there is 75-80% loss in hashrate. Also as i remember, ccminer was running at much lower TDP% as shown in Afterburner, ~80% while cgminer was using 98-100% power. Considering all this i think there is a big disadvantage & some potential for optimizing ccminer for decred, unless the modification required for decred somehow lower the hashrate. But i guess ccminer devs are too busy taking potshots at each other, so we will have to make do with what we have or wait for decred team to release something.

Dude, of COURSE there is. That's 8 round Blake, this is 14 round Blake. Try to understand what the PoW is before benchmarking.

Since 14 is 75% more than 8... you're DEAD ON.

Nope that is for 14 round blake. On 8 round blake i get 2.5GH/s & 920 MH/s. I am mining VNL right now. I am a noob but not that much.

*facepaw* VNL is 8 round.

@wolf exactly 8 round blake on VNL is giving me 2.5 GH/s & 920 MH/s and 14 round gives me 1.5GH/s & 520MH/s on ccminer. What is facepalm about it? still cgminer is 80% less than what i get on ccminer for 14 round blake. Also 14 round blake is 60% of 8 round blake on ccminer so there is some room for improvement if as you say it should be 80% of 8 round blake. Dude you totally taking me for a moron or am i really missing something here?

Bitcoin_Delivery

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 500

Nice Java GUI wallet beta released by SG-O, for those that don't like to work in command line

https://forum.decred.org/threads/java-gui-wallet.382/

Some of features implemented are:
- Show balance
- Show a certain number of transactions
- Lock and unlock wallet
- Sending Decreds to an address

This version has only been tested on Windows 7
Tanks to SG-O for the effort, users community rocks and i'm already loving this coin Wink

sambiohazard

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 04, 2016, 06:10:08 AM

Quote from: sambiohazard on February 04, 2016, 05:25:47 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 03, 2016, 10:15:16 PM

Quote from: thefix on February 03, 2016, 08:39:00 PM

Very interesting project, unfortunate that Nvidia miners are not getting the same love as AMD

Do we need to crowd fund to get something valid released?

Maybe we just do not have enough Nvidia miners to Justify our existence.

Really, you're not being as picked on as it seems - CUDA is great when it comes to more complex algos, or algos that can benefit from Nvidia-specific optimizations that the compiler is unable to find by itself, but this is not the case for Decred. Really, you're talking about a minor bump I would guess, at most. The algo is dead simple - I've made the miner a few percent faster on AMD - but we're talking single digit percentages... and low digits. The Nvidia OpenCL compiler would really have a hard time fucking it up.

@wolf I tried the cgminer & ccminer both & they give me

970 1.52 GH/s on ccminer & 1.11GH/s on cgminer
750ti 530MH/s in ccminer & 431 MH/s on cgminer

so there is 75-80% loss in hashrate. Also as i remember, ccminer was running at much lower TDP% as shown in Afterburner, ~80% while cgminer was using 98-100% power. Considering all this i think there is a big disadvantage & some potential for optimizing ccminer for decred, unless the modification required for decred somehow lower the hashrate. But i guess ccminer devs are too busy taking potshots at each other, so we will have to make do with what we have or wait for decred team to release something.

Dude, of COURSE there is. That's 8 round Blake, this is 14 round Blake. Try to understand what the PoW is before benchmarking.

Since 14 is 75% more than 8... you're DEAD ON.

Nope that is for 14 round blake. On 8 round blake i get 2.5GH/s & 920 MH/s. I am mining VNL right now. I am a noob but not that much.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1240

Quote from: Gunther on February 04, 2016, 07:09:38 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 04, 2016, 06:10:08 AM

Quote from: sambiohazard on February 04, 2016, 05:25:47 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 03, 2016, 10:15:16 PM

Quote from: thefix on February 03, 2016, 08:39:00 PM

Very interesting project, unfortunate that Nvidia miners are not getting the same love as AMD

Do we need to crowd fund to get something valid released?

Maybe we just do not have enough Nvidia miners to Justify our existence.

Really, you're not being as picked on as it seems - CUDA is great when it comes to more complex algos, or algos that can benefit from Nvidia-specific optimizations that the compiler is unable to find by itself, but this is not the case for Decred. Really, you're talking about a minor bump I would guess, at most. The algo is dead simple - I've made the miner a few percent faster on AMD - but we're talking single digit percentages... and low digits. The Nvidia OpenCL compiler would really have a hard time fucking it up.

@wolf I tried the cgminer & ccminer both & they give me

970 1.52 GH/s on ccminer & 1.11GH/s on cgminer
750ti 530MH/s in ccminer & 431 MH/s on cgminer

so there is 75-80% loss in hashrate. Also as i remember, ccminer was running at much lower TDP% as shown in Afterburner, ~80% while cgminer was using 98-100% power. Considering all this i think there is a big disadvantage & some potential for optimizing ccminer for decred, unless the modification required for decred somehow lower the hashrate. But i guess ccminer devs are too busy taking potshots at each other, so we will have to make do with what we have or wait for decred team to release something.

Dude, of COURSE there is. That's 8 round Blake, this is 14 round Blake. Try to understand what the PoW is before benchmarking.

Since 14 is 75% more than 8... you're DEAD ON.

Customer is king. If he wants more hashes, give him more hashes. Let that cunt aim the original cgminer at some Blake256 scamcoin and he'll get more hashes.

Quote from: ocminer on February 04, 2016, 07:06:37 AM

Quote from: Gunther on February 04, 2016, 05:18:18 AM

Nice, a pool is already up. Rented some hashes to test but pool (suprnova) doesn't seem to work. Probably because it's some new algo, right? It's hard for a pool to implement new features, but i'm sure you will get it done before launch.

You cannot rent hashes for this algo yet.

Suprnova is working perfectly fine

I remember us having a beef about your pools. Lets hope you don't fuck up this time ok chap? Wink

And please provide rentals else it's unfair to the people without GPU-rigs.

?? ?

I don't provide rentals, I only provide pools. Working pools. And the "beef" was the same story like this time, you're misunderstanding quite a lot about Pools, POW/POS, Algos, rentals etc.

Gunther

legendary

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 04, 2016, 06:10:08 AM

Quote from: sambiohazard on February 04, 2016, 05:25:47 AM

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 03, 2016, 10:15:16 PM

Quote from: thefix on February 03, 2016, 08:39:00 PM

Very interesting project, unfortunate that Nvidia miners are not getting the same love as AMD

Do we need to crowd fund to get something valid released?

Maybe we just do not have enough Nvidia miners to Justify our existence.

Really, you're not being as picked on as it seems - CUDA is great when it comes to more complex algos, or algos that can benefit from Nvidia-specific optimizations that the compiler is unable to find by itself, but this is not the case for Decred. Really, you're talking about a minor bump I would guess, at most. The algo is dead simple - I've made the miner a few percent faster on AMD - but we're talking single digit percentages... and low digits. The Nvidia OpenCL compiler would really have a hard time fucking it up.

@wolf I tried the cgminer & ccminer both & they give me

970 1.52 GH/s on ccminer & 1.11GH/s on cgminer
750ti 530MH/s in ccminer & 431 MH/s on cgminer

so there is 75-80% loss in hashrate. Also as i remember, ccminer was running at much lower TDP% as shown in Afterburner, ~80% while cgminer was using 98-100% power. Considering all this i think there is a big disadvantage & some potential for optimizing ccminer for decred, unless the modification required for decred somehow lower the hashrate. But i guess ccminer devs are too busy taking potshots at each other, so we will have to make do with what we have or wait for decred team to release something.

Dude, of COURSE there is. That's 8 round Blake, this is 14 round Blake. Try to understand what the PoW is before benchmarking.

Since 14 is 75% more than 8... you're DEAD ON.

Customer is king. If he wants more hashes, give him more hashes. Let that cunt aim the original cgminer at some Blake256 scamcoin and he'll get more hashes.

Quote from: ocminer on February 04, 2016, 07:06:37 AM

Quote from: Gunther on February 04, 2016, 05:18:18 AM

Nice, a pool is already up. Rented some hashes to test but pool (suprnova) doesn't seem to work. Probably because it's some new algo, right? It's hard for a pool to implement new features, but i'm sure you will get it done before launch.

You cannot rent hashes for this algo yet.

Suprnova is working perfectly fine

I remember us having a beef about your pools. Lets hope you don't fuck up this time ok chap? Wink

And please provide rentals else it's unfair to the people without GPU-rigs.

ocminer

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1240

Quote from: Gunther on February 04, 2016, 05:18:18 AM

Nice, a pool is already up. Rented some hashes to test but pool (suprnova) doesn't seem to work. Probably because it's some new algo, right? It's hard for a pool to implement new features, but i'm sure you will get it done before launch.

You cannot rent hashes for this algo yet.

Suprnova is working perfectly fine

CrypticTrader

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 06:07:28 AM

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 06:02:10 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:58:46 AM

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 05:52:28 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:46:41 AM

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

What do I mine with?

Same as on suprnova pool - for now: https://github.com/ocminer/cgminer-decred but already pull requests are pending on official cgminer: https://github.com/decred/cgminer

Is it worth mining with PC (no fancy gpu)

probably at the beginning when diff is low... everything depends

cheers for the answers

feeleep

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1000

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 06:02:10 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:58:46 AM

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 05:52:28 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:46:41 AM

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

What do I mine with?

Same as on suprnova pool - for now: https://github.com/ocminer/cgminer-decred but already pull requests are pending on official cgminer: https://github.com/decred/cgminer

Is it worth mining with PC (no fancy gpu)

probably at the beginning when diff is low... everything depends

CrypticTrader

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:58:46 AM

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 05:52:28 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:46:41 AM

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

What do I mine with?

Same as on suprnova pool - for now: https://github.com/ocminer/cgminer-decred but already pull requests are pending on official cgminer: https://github.com/decred/cgminer

Is it worth mining with PC (no fancy gpu)

feeleep

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1000

Quote from: CrypticTrader on February 04, 2016, 05:52:28 AM

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:46:41 AM

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

What do I mine with?

Same as on suprnova pool - for now: https://github.com/ocminer/cgminer-decred but already pull requests are pending on official cgminer: https://github.com/decred/cgminer

CrypticTrader

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

Quote from: feeleep on February 04, 2016, 05:46:41 AM

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

What do I mine with?

feeleep

legendary

Activity: 1197

Merit: 1000

Hi,

My pool is up and running on testnet right now - it will be switched to mainnet once its live

https://www2.coinmine.pl/dcr/

cheers,
feeleep

edmundduke

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 1007

Quote from: eshriek on February 04, 2016, 02:32:18 AM

Quote from: ozboy2014 on February 04, 2016, 02:20:39 AM

which exchange(s) are Decred likely to be on initially?

https://bleutrade.com referenced from here: https://forum.decred.org/threads/mainnet-launch-date.380/#post-5442

I am pretty sure that it will be added on many exchanges at launch. YoBit and Bleutrade will add it for sure and i have a feeling that a big exchange like Bittrex or Polo will be short to follow (if not added from the start). This project is big enough to catch the interest of the exchanges because there will be a lot of trading from the start and the exchanges would be stupid not to take part of it. My money would be on Bittrex, pretty sure it will be added there.

sambiohazard

hero member

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Wolf0 on February 03, 2016, 10:15:16 PM

Quote from: thefix on February 03, 2016, 08:39:00 PM

Very interesting project, unfortunate that Nvidia miners are not getting the same love as AMD

Do we need to crowd fund to get something valid released?

Maybe we just do not have enough Nvidia miners to Justify our existence.

Really, you're not being as picked on as it seems - CUDA is great when it comes to more complex algos, or algos that can benefit from Nvidia-specific optimizations that the compiler is unable to find by itself, but this is not the case for Decred. Really, you're talking about a minor bump I would guess, at most. The algo is dead simple - I've made the miner a few percent faster on AMD - but we're talking single digit percentages... and low digits. The Nvidia OpenCL compiler would really have a hard time fucking it up.

@wolf I tried the cgminer & ccminer both & they give me

970 1.52 GH/s on ccminer & 1.11GH/s on cgminer
750ti 530MH/s in ccminer & 431 MH/s on cgminer

so there is 75-80% loss in hashrate. Also as i remember, ccminer was running at much lower TDP% as shown in Afterburner, ~80% while cgminer was using 98-100% power. Considering all this i think there is a big disadvantage & some potential for optimizing ccminer for decred, unless the modification required for decred somehow lower the hashrate. But i guess ccminer devs are too busy taking potshots at each other, so we will have to make do with what we have or wait for decred team to release something.

anders lokka

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 250

Quote from: Gunther on February 04, 2016, 05:18:18 AM

Nice, a pool is already up. Rented some hashes to test but pool (suprnova) doesn't seem to work. Probably because it's some new algo, right? It's hard for a pool to implement new features, but i'm sure you will get it done before launch.

It's Blake 14 round.
No rent hash available now.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Godson_Mansa on February 03, 2016, 10:44:30 PM

Question for the nerds!!!
will rented hash work ? or will it not cos this isn't the same Blake257 algo.

@wolf0
@ocminer

you know yourselves.

Not until stratum.

Gunther

legendary

Activity: 840

Merit: 1000

Nice, a pool is already up. Rented some hashes to test but pool (suprnova) doesn't seem to work. Probably because it's some new algo, right? It's hard for a pool to implement new features, but i'm sure you will get it done before launch.

anders lokka

sr. member

Activity: 700

Merit: 250

Quote from: ocminer on February 04, 2016, 12:19:36 AM

Quote from: craslovell on February 04, 2016, 12:18:38 AM

@ocminer

Do you know what address and port number the pool will use when decred officially launches on Monday? Wasn't sure if you were going to change it. I will be away from my gear with no internet access during launch and I'm trying to get this sucker started through a scheduled task.

Will remain the same.

suprnova pool work fine.
Good job.

Topic: [ANN][DCR] Decred - Community Governance | Bitcoin Devs | Lightning Network - page 490. (Read 1201599 times)