Author

Topic: [ANN][DGC] Digitalcoin | Multi-algo & Masternodes | Established 2013 - page 109. (Read 523584 times)

legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Announcing a new DGC pool.

PPLNB (PPS)
Vardiff Stratum
Custom made front and backend
payments every 5 minutes

http://www.miningpool.co
full member
Activity: 186
Merit: 100
Monero
Just noticed the global hashrate on http://dgc.epools.org/. It says " Network hashrate: 3030.15 MH/s" When did the network pick up so much?

Its the miners who are switching what coin they mine based on the difficulty/profitability of mining.

The global hashrate is going to go back to 400MH/s as soon as the difficulty for DGC goes back up
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Just noticed the global hashrate on http://dgc.epools.org/. It says " Network hashrate: 3030.15 MH/s" When did the network pick up so much?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1001
Lowering the number of blocks to retarget does not help. It's an automated system, it doesn't care how often it switches.

What do you expect to happen when most of the community are selfish profiteers? It's not my place to control people or their behaviour. The network is still functioning well and those with a longterm outlook won't join this idiotic trend.

+1 hold on tight, I don't mind mining at diff 5, 1000 times better than mining ltc at diff 900 or so.
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
Long time ago, there was an attempt to make PPS pool, do you have any idea how it ends?
no I don't enlighten me

I dont know, thats why I am asking. I was not asking directly you
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Long time ago, there was an attempt to make PPS pool, do you have any idea how it ends?
no I don't enlighten me
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
Long time ago, there was an attempt to make PPS pool, do you have any idea how it ends?
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
I have a dump question can't we just make pools private,.errr I think that would cause a fork to get the others off the chain correct?
full member
Activity: 163
Merit: 100
Lowering the number of blocks to retarget does not help. It's an automated system, it doesn't care how often it switches.

What do you expect to happen when most of the community are selfish profiteers? It's not my place to control people or their behaviour. The network is still functioning well and those with a longterm outlook won't join this idiotic trend.

Can you tell us if collecting list of all nodes has something to do with prevention against that idiotic trend?
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
Network hashrate: 316.84 MH/s
Current difficulty
4.5503
Next difficulty
1.8623
Is again some coin-switching pool jumping on dgc?

Again? It did not stopped

Multipool of course. They are also bringing a tone of orphans with them (lover coin difficulty with sudden flow of high hashrate miners "fighting" for a block). What is funny after that found is bashing on a coin and Developers Angry.  

It has happened again.
Current Diff: 1.879  
Global Hashrate: 1,213,870 KH/s
Next Diff:  5.1274

We should look for ways to build circuit breakers into DGC to prevent the swarm of locusts from pumping and dumping DGC like a cheap hooker.  Here is a few ideas I've seen thrown around: Rejecting blocks from a single source with more than %40 of the hashpower, To reject or que blocks that violate the minimum block time, or adjusting the difficulty at a faster rate.  CartmanSPC suggested "Develop the wallet/coin to throttle new blocks found based on an average of blocks found over the previous "x" period of time."

I know these solutions will produce orphans during spikes but I fear what will happen if we do nothing. In the short term its creating shortage of dgc and pushing the price up, which seems good in relation to the block reward dispute.  But in the long term it may drive off loyal miners making dgc vulnerable to attack between or during hashspikes (like what happened to FTC a few months ago).  If you look at the Multipool thread you will see the admin has a sadistic attitude towards most alt coins in general.  Something needs to be done before people loose confidence.

Multipool Discussion Referenced: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multipool-and-middlecoin-big-profit-even-bigger-troubles-263827

I hope something is done, its getting more difficult to remain loyal mining this coin. Of course I love this coin so will still carry on mining but I wouldn't blame someone for jumping ship, majority of the time we are stuck mining it with the difficulty at 5.0+


I agree with you guys. Let us see what Baritus has to say about it? Coin is stucked dead in the muddy water. Some  younger ALT coins doing much better bcs mutlishitmiddlebraindead and similar pools are not jumping on them(CGB,DMD,etc...). If everything stay the same DGC will be half dead coin like what happened to ARG. I was minnig DGC for one whole month but now not any more because of those jumping idiotic pools. I might be back if i can see some progrees regarding that topic. If Developer(s) do not care why shoud I?


I see your concerns but imho, once DGC gains traction from bank/exchange and services, the multipools will be nothing but a small potholes on the road.


-tb-
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Lowering the number of blocks to retarget does not help. It's an automated system, it doesn't care how often it switches.

What do you expect to happen when most of the community are selfish profiteers? It's not my place to control people or their behaviour. The network is still functioning well and those with a longterm outlook won't join this idiotic trend.
Well put
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1052
Lowering the number of blocks to retarget does not help. It's an automated system, it doesn't care how often it switches.

What do you expect to happen when most of the community are selfish profiteers? It's not my place to control people or their behaviour. The network is still functioning well and those with a longterm outlook won't join this idiotic trend.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
Why not lower the amount of blocks between diff adjustments? DGC is a fast coin but 1k blocks between adjustments seems a bit high considering the way things are with alt coins these days.
full member
Activity: 212
Merit: 100
Network hashrate: 316.84 MH/s
Current difficulty
4.5503
Next difficulty
1.8623
Is again some coin-switching pool jumping on dgc?

Again? It did not stopped

Multipool of course. They are also bringing a tone of orphans with them (lover coin difficulty with sudden flow of high hashrate miners "fighting" for a block). What is funny after that found is bashing on a coin and Developers Angry.  

It has happened again.
Current Diff: 1.879  
Global Hashrate: 1,213,870 KH/s
Next Diff:  5.1274

We should look for ways to build circuit breakers into DGC to prevent the swarm of locusts from pumping and dumping DGC like a cheap hooker.  Here is a few ideas I've seen thrown around: Rejecting blocks from a single source with more than %40 of the hashpower, To reject or que blocks that violate the minimum block time, or adjusting the difficulty at a faster rate.  CartmanSPC suggested "Develop the wallet/coin to throttle new blocks found based on an average of blocks found over the previous "x" period of time."

I know these solutions will produce orphans during spikes but I fear what will happen if we do nothing. In the short term its creating shortage of dgc and pushing the price up, which seems good in relation to the block reward dispute.  But in the long term it may drive off loyal miners making dgc vulnerable to attack between or during hashspikes (like what happened to FTC a few months ago).  If you look at the Multipool thread you will see the admin has a sadistic attitude towards most alt coins in general.  Something needs to be done before people loose confidence.

Multipool Discussion Referenced: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multipool-and-middlecoin-big-profit-even-bigger-troubles-263827

I hope something is done, its getting more difficult to remain loyal mining this coin. Of course I love this coin so will still carry on mining but I wouldn't blame someone for jumping ship, majority of the time we are stuck mining it with the difficulty at 5.0+


I agree with you guys. Let us see what Baritus has to say about it? Coin is stucked dead in the muddy water. Some  younger ALT coins doing much better bcs mutlishitmiddlebraindead and similar pools are not jumping on them(CGB,DMD,etc...). If everything stay the same DGC will be half dead coin like what happened to ARG. I was minnig DGC for one whole month but now not any more because of those jumping idiotic pools. I might be back if i can see some progrees regarding that topic. If Developer(s) do not care why shoud I?
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Network hashrate: 316.84 MH/s
Current difficulty
4.5503
Next difficulty
1.8623
Is again some coin-switching pool jumping on dgc?

Again? It did not stopped

Multipool of course. They are also bringing a tone of orphans with them (lover coin difficulty with sudden flow of high hashrate miners "fighting" for a block). What is funny after that found is bashing on a coin and Developers Angry.  

It has happened again.
Current Diff: 1.879  
Global Hashrate: 1,213,870 KH/s
Next Diff:  5.1274

We should look for ways to build circuit breakers into DGC to prevent the swarm of locusts from pumping and dumping DGC like a cheap hooker.  Here is a few ideas I've seen thrown around: Rejecting blocks from a single source with more than %40 of the hashpower, To reject or que blocks that violate the minimum block time, or adjusting the difficulty at a faster rate.  CartmanSPC suggested "Develop the wallet/coin to throttle new blocks found based on an average of blocks found over the previous "x" period of time."

I know these solutions will produce orphans during spikes but I fear what will happen if we do nothing. In the short term its creating shortage of dgc and pushing the price up, which seems good in relation to the block reward dispute.  But in the long term it may drive off loyal miners making dgc vulnerable to attack between or during hashspikes (like what happened to FTC a few months ago).  If you look at the Multipool thread you will see the admin has a sadistic attitude towards most alt coins in general.  Something needs to be done before people loose confidence.

Multipool Discussion Referenced: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multipool-and-middlecoin-big-profit-even-bigger-troubles-263827

I hope something is done, its getting more difficult to remain loyal mining this coin. Of course I love this coin so will still carry on mining but I wouldn't blame someone for jumping ship, majority of the time we are stuck mining it with the difficulty at 5.0+
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
As requested, DGC has been added as payment to www.porndatabase.co.uk/get-btc-porn/ where can give yourself or a friend the gift of porn.
Is this a plugin I would like to accept DGC on my site also but not a porn one :-D
newbie
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
Network hashrate: 316.84 MH/s
Current difficulty
4.5503
Next difficulty
1.8623
Is again some coin-switching pool jumping on dgc?

Again? It did not stopped

Multipool of course. They are also bringing a tone of orphans with them (lover coin difficulty with sudden flow of high hashrate miners "fighting" for a block). What is funny after that found is bashing on a coin and Developers Angry.  

It has happened again.
Current Diff: 1.879  
Global Hashrate: 1,213,870 KH/s
Next Diff:  5.1274

We should look for ways to build circuit breakers into DGC to prevent the swarm of locusts from pumping and dumping DGC like a cheap hooker.  Here is a few ideas I've seen thrown around: Rejecting blocks from a single source with more than %40 of the hashpower, To reject or que blocks that violate the minimum block time, or adjusting the difficulty at a faster rate.  CartmanSPC suggested "Develop the wallet/coin to throttle new blocks found based on an average of blocks found over the previous "x" period of time."

I know these solutions will produce orphans during spikes but I fear what will happen if we do nothing. In the short term its creating shortage of dgc and pushing the price up, which seems good in relation to the block reward dispute.  But in the long term it may drive off loyal miners making dgc vulnerable to attack between or during hashspikes (like what happened to FTC a few months ago).  If you look at the Multipool thread you will see the admin has a sadistic attitude towards most alt coins in general.  Something needs to be done before people loose confidence.

Multipool Discussion Referenced: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/multipool-and-middlecoin-big-profit-even-bigger-troubles-263827
hero member
Activity: 1361
Merit: 506
Hey all,

Baritus asked if we can get a list together of the currently working DGC nodes. Can you post them here -> http://digitalcoin.co/forums/index.php/topic,115.0.html

so we can compile the list.

Cheers,

RZ.
full member
Activity: 134
Merit: 100
wallet still shows nothing 0/5 confirmations until now

I'm copying this from here as I'm being too lazy to write it out myself...:
http://digitalcoin.co/forums/index.php/topic,102.msg291.html#msg291
Quote
Did you try doing a -rescan ? This will rescan the block chain to find any missing transactions.

Create and/or 2nd mouse button click on the digitalcoin shortcut on your desktop. Select > Properties.

In the 'Target' field add --rescan: "C:\Program Files (x86)\digitalcoin\digitalcoin-qt.exe" --rescan

Click on Apply and OK. Now re-start digitalcoin via this shortcut.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
wallet still shows nothing 0/5 confirmations until now
Jump to: