Topic: [ANN][EGC] EverGreenCoin | Environmental Green Causes | Full 7% PoS | Foundation - page 138. (Read 284552 times)

EverGreenCoin Version 1.2.1 (w/ BIP66) passed all its test and is running on the 1st seed node (seed.evergreencoin.org) and some local boxes now. The source has been pushed. Updating the other seednodes as soon as possible. Windows and Mac binaries will be made available as soon as possible thereafter.

Sorry for the slow update, been arguing with a service provider.

EDIT politely arguing of course.

At this time only 108.61.216.195 and i have a local at 74.5.137.87 I believe crysx has one running.

EDIT the BIP66 improvement has put a wrinkle in 1.2 roll out. 1.2.1 will include the BIP66 improvement. It is being tested  (@ 74.5.137.87)

What nodes have the version of a wallet 1.2?

Trade at Bittrex is disabled. Dunno why.

I have been advised adding BIP66 to the EverGreenCoin code will help against forks. I am doing test builds with BIP66 now.

Noted and will be addressed. Thank you for bringing this to attention.

Good news
I'll update as soon as possible.

Btw I googled for "renewable energy coin", which leaves me with the feeling that a good seo is definitely needed.

I have uncovered what I feel may have been the culprit of the forks and it does relate to PoS. Checkpoint staking modifiers specifically. I have pushed EverGreenCoin version 1.2 to github. I have updated the first seednode to 1.2 already and will be upgrading the 2nd now. Crysx is updating the seednodes on the granite network now as well.

Windows and Mac EGC v1.2 wallets will be compiled and released as soon as possible.

faucet EGC http://coin-faucet.com/EGC/

hi dev. PM sent, done.  

If you wish for me to have a look, I would be glad to help. PM me if so.

The block explorer is going down for repairs. This will be about 4 hours to complete. Sorry for the interruption but it is needed.

I bought more so for the future. temporarily forget about the low response from yobit .. and I made a presentation pdf to facilitate people to do what the EGC. but my english is bad (google translate), and I need some input, for plus and minus. later will come the post: D

An another Investor, I second this.

Furthermore, I am willing to provide additional website development and project advice to advance the coin if interested.

With a few tweaks, this coin could be doing really well.

A balance between moderating the forum and further business/technical development would be optimal.

Cheers,

Portdavenport
www.scifidomain.com

Sure thing Wosterlee. Some very promising developments have been going forward with the solar mining farm behind the scenes. This is the big long term goal I had set for this project long ago at its conception and, despite the obstacles and nay sayers' negativity, it will become reality. That will propel EGC, and crypto, to truely uncharted territory. I can not disclose details at this time but, this will not only turn heads in the mining community. The entire renewables industry will be taking notice of EGC and the EGC solar mining farm project. It will be gigantic. As you may imagine, this involves large sums of other peoples money and is the reason for the confidentiality.

As far as the solar miner, it seems the trading side is not the only side effected by weak hands as some of the people helping me with that have vanished on me. But no worries, thinning the heard of people that only have financial ambitions makes room for the people that truely share the environmental ambitions of EverGreenCoin. I view this as a blessing in disguise. I do have the like minded solar engineer in mind that can help me take this project to production. I will meet with him in the near future and see if a formal agreement can be made. I wouldn't be mentioning it if I did not feel a favorable outcome was likely.

As you may or may not know, a payment processing gateway is a goal that is preventing many merchants that wish to accept EGC from doing so. Achieving this goal will do much to help stabilize the price. I will get another social media campaign/push for this together. This is another obligation I previously had assistance with I will and must assume. I have been in crypto long enough to know the role of lead dev oftentimes becomes lead do everything. No worries, I am accustom to it and know the people I can depend on, regardless of market fluctuations or troubled waters. Another blessing.

I will keep you all posted. Thanks for holding and realizing the big goals of EverGreenCoin are very ambitious, will take time, and will not be easy. Only worth every bit of it. Even weak hands could become strong, once all the cards are out. But folding before then only makes any hand a loser.

Hey Dev! Is there any chance that you could do an ongoing (bi)monthly development update of what is happening behind the scenes at Evergreencoin. Seeing your activity on this thread it would seem to me like a small excersize. Some 'weak hands' sold after the problems with the blockchain last week and I also think it is correlated with the lack of updates. As an investor I would like to be assured of ongoing development and some realistic goal setting. I'm sure this will attract new investors as well. Your thoughts?

Urging yobit has made 'anything' happen. This is how we got them to put the wallet in maintenance in the first place.

I never said  myself and/or the foundation would not compensate. In fact I have been saying the whole time that the foundation and/or myself would when and if coins are actually found missing. I have proved this willingness is not just words with c-cex but later these steps were found to be unnecessary. Coins have not been found missing with all the other exchanges after both the exchange and user's own wallets got on the correct chain and with minimal further investigation/action. Suspecting a similar outcome again is no stretch but again, I would do everything possible to get coins where they rightfully belong when those facts can be proven or dis-proven. You can not expect me to pass out the Foundation's or my own coins to every person that makes claim that I can not verify. Even if all of these claims were true, which has been proven not to be the case already, we all know the Foundation nor myself would be returned the majority of coins prematurely compensated for and later recovered by the exchange by ways of either the exchange simply getting on the correct chain or after doing so and the exchange's records being brought to balance by my own and/or the EGC Foundation's coins.

Sorry if you find any of this unreasonable and to see you go.

Ok,
Just forget it, Urging Yobit is not making anything happen, and it has been ~10 days,
and since you won't compensate those that lost their EGC in the Fork, forget I even mention it.
I'll just ignore this coin from now on.


 

Yes, yet another thing that is out of my control is other people's wallets. Only my own, the foundation's, the faucet's, the block explorer's, and the seednodes' can I ensure our on the correct chain and do anything about directly. Like frostminer suggest, and as I have been urging, removing any previously added addnodes in any conf file and only using the official seednodes (that are hadrcoded in the wallet) to sync and discover more peers is the best way to be sure you will not peer with and sync from another wallet that is in an incorrect fork.

I do apologize for the time it takes to bootstrap or resync over the network. This is out of my control as well and I thank you for the patience it does require. 

If your wallet fails to meet a checkpoint, hardcoded or from the checkpoint server, it will throw an error, "invalid checkpoint found." Informing the fact you have not matched a checkpoint. You would have come to this point by reaching a presumed consensus with other nodes that are in an incorrect fork. Your wallet, thinking it consensus is correct, is telling you it is on a consensus that differs from a checkpoint, hardcoded or from the checkpoint server. The qt wallet will display this error in the lower left. A daemon will display this error in its error value. Both would log the error in your error log.

Any coin reconciliation will occur with the exchanges first and after they have got on the correct chain and performed internal audits. If the mentioned tx did happen in an incorrect fork, the coins would be back in yobit's wallet and subsequently in your yobit account when they do get on the correct blockchain. This has been the case, no funds needed covered nor people "SOL", with all the other exchanges and I am urging yobit to do this daily but I have no control over their willingness to do so.