Why then list our details on a public spreadsheet if we're not getting anything? Why not just include the 200 people who you sent to? From reading this thread, there are people who received tokens from BOTH airdrops while most didn't get nothing?
Plus the fact that Amber, (the scamming skank) the previous mod from ecash is also modding the elite telegram. So anyone thinking of joining the telegram group, be ready to be banned by this skank, if you ask questions.
Just to increase your following and to give the perception of a large community, we were led to believe that those who applied without fraudulent claims, will receive airdrop, when that was NOT the case.
In short, it looks like this will be another pump and dump token, involving the same scamming scumbags from previous E-xxx tokens.
P.S. Please remove our details from the spreadsheet and include those 200 people you sent tokens to.
Where did we said that everyone will receive coins? Please back your claims up before you say something. The moment we announced the airdrop we specifically said that due to the limited supply we had left over from the first airdrop, only limited amount of people will receive the airdrop - we never deceived anybody, it's not our fault if people signed up for the airdrop form and didn't even bother reading our short bitcointalk thread. We don't want to delete the form since people would think that it's shady, the form should automatically expire in few days.
Also, we have no idea whether Amber was or was not a mod on ecash, we don't have and never had any affiliation with that project. Amber simply contacted us about telegram moderation and since we needed help with it, we agreed. And we haven't received any complaints about Amber from anybody so far.
1st of all, stop with the BS with 'we', 1 person doesn't make it a WE.
2nd of all you stated on main page ''Airdrop #2 will run for couple of days. The amount of people that can sign up for airdrop #2 to receive ELITE is unlimited, but limited amount of people will receive ELITE due to smaller supply for this airdrop. All airdrops will total to 50,000 ELITE distributed to airdrop participants. In order to apply for the second airdrop, you must join our Telegram channel, follow us on Twitter and be at least Jr.Member on Bitcointalk. Create, collaborate, contact your favorite exchanges about listing Ethereum Lite and be active in the community.''
If your intention was to send 200 people airdrops, you should have said so instead of 'limited', which gave false info to people applying, but you still accepted people joining and promoting your token when you were fully aware that only 200 was going to receive it. You could have also limited the application to 200 people but you didn't. That is deceitful.
3rd and last is the connection to AMBER the scamming skank! Anybody who knows this skank knows full well that the only 'projects' she is involved in are SCAMS.
So Chris, this is why.
Now, please remove ALL details of the people who HAVEN'T received anything to the ones who DID received it. Why even put details of people who applied and not accepted on a public spreadsheet? The people who make multiple applications will be farming those details for future airdrops thanks to you.
There is actually 2 of us, so it's we. The reason why we let the airdrop go for a longer time was because our first airdrop had a cap of 1500 participants and that was reached in less than 5 hours and we got hundreds of PMs afterwards saying it wasn't fair that the registrations ended so quickly, so we decided to do it this way in our second airdrop, give people more time to sign up for the airdrop and then distribute to a portion of the participants. We just didn't expect over 4000 applications, however a huge portion of that were ineligible newbie members and a lot of entries were also duplicates that had the same address multiple times in the spreadsheet, most likely from bots signing up multiple times. I agree that we should have mentioned how many people we were planning to distribute the coins to, and that is fully our fault and we will be more transparent next time, but we didn't give anybody false info.
Once again, we don't know if Amber was ever affiliated with any other projects because we don't know her (or him). We were contacted by this person regarding moderation of our Telegram and we accepted since we needed help with moderation. Once we receive complaints about abuse of power or removing posts for no reason on the Telegram, we will consider further action but we haven't received anything yet.
And we haven't put anything on the public spreadsheet, the public spreadsheet was linked to the form and was created on the go as people were signing up and a lot of people has asked us to share it, so we did. But I agree with your point that people could be using it to farm details so we will bring it down for now.