imho, it is a terrible idea to even think about editing the ledger. If the coin are lost, so be it. In my point of view, faircoin will lost a lot of credibility if they do that.
I would like if you could share any argument of your opinion, because i dont see nothing in deep that sustain it.
Otherwise
I see that Faircoin was the first coin that was distributed freely to everyone in this forum that asked for it. So was distributed without paying money, neither spending energy to get it. And that about 7/8 % of coins that was distributed for free, dont was staked neither used in near of a year; and most of them was abandoned or lost for lack of interest.
So, this is like a gift that the first day is abandoned in the middle of nowhere
And we are going to redistribute this unused amount, to people that has put money for it, or is going a put time and energy in projects related faircoin. This for the faircoin dev team and the Faircoop community is fair enough....
On the other hand, the credibitily of faircoin not depends of the usual cryptoworld values (like, "omg edite the ledger is a crime"
), but of the values of the peoples around the world that have affinity with the FairCoop aims and principles, of cooperation ans social justice, among others; and i can say you that for the people with this values, to make a very different project than bitcoin at the level of values, will be a way to increase the credibility of Faircoin.
We are going to go far in this Faircoin evolution and this is only early stages related with this process.
Anyway, this is an interesting discussion that would be better if sharing arguments in deep,
Hi,
Here the way I see it. Bitcoin philosophy is to create a decentralized consensus mecanism that make it possible to trust about
exactly what happened on the ledger in the
past, what happen in the ledger
now, and what will happen on the ledger in the
future. The decentralized concensus mecanism is similar with faircoin, but what you are proposing is a really centralized decision from the developer of faircoin. In a certain sense, by acting the way you wish to do, it could happen that you even steal wealth from people to give it to someone else. That is not a good way of doing thing imo and is not a good philosophy, even tho, I understand very well that you would like to give the faircoin to people that contribute to the faircoin developement. It is a good goal, but the way of doing is wrong. In the end, if you start editing the ledger in a centralized manner, who knows what will happen in the future on other situations. The trust in the blockchain decentralized consensus mecanism is lost the moment the ledger is manually edited
without consensus.
If they were a decentralize voting system in the faircoin wallet I would call for a vote on this. I would certainly vote against it, but I would respect a decentralized majority decision and take decision afterward about my faircoin holding.
If the faircoin are lost, then it do not matter anyway because it would be like the coin never existed in the first place since they come from the "genesis" block. And since there is inflation in the farcoin system, losing coin really really do not matter, they will be eventually replace...
I strongly advise not to do such a thing on the faircoin blockchain.