Topic: [ANN][FLO] A Worldwide Public Record | Alexandria | ETDB | Medici | 0.15 Segwit - page 87. (Read 516115 times)

It's not dead. I was invited into the private alpha about a month ago and it's still in development. It's just not one of those coins with a bunch of people hyping it (which is better as far as I'm concerned). 

I'm not accumulating anymore, but then, I did plenty of that last year when nobody was paying attention to it...

 
      I need a updated addnode list

  ty

i will buy more,, i need more florin,, 

I've started my accumulation.  The future is bright imo

any update? so how about status florin

Any status updates on Alexandria? It looks dead given how much it's being talked about.

this coin seem very promising so I've bought some!! Count me IN

I agree that this can be done with side chains, and this is part of the reason for this design.  It adapts to side chains or non side chained altchains. I am of the mind thinking there will be many blockchain based networks some day each with a specific niche.  If Bitcoin was the standard P2P payment network globally, I would not be surprised.  But I would be surprised if developers decided to only build new blockchain models off of sidechains.

There is a steady stream of work saying POS variations can be strong enough to run blockchains and have a tough time believing that Bitshares, Ethereum, NXT, and Peershares et. al. are just going to get made irrelevant by all the POW side chained alternatives.   So I am planning both for side chained and non side chained blockchains in the future that have their own economic systems.

Furthermore, Lighting Payment Channel based networks could provide a near real time off chain layer for smart contracts based on the basics outlined above alleviating blockchain bloat on any one blockchain that is not subject to the txnID malleability problems.

These are all contingencies I am balancing for.

Hi, sooner or later bitcoin will adapt to sidechain technology. Proof of Burn with coins created in sidechain is the future of Bitcoin. With this feature it will probably kill altcoins. BTC is worldwide accepted and with sidechains it will be as good as any other alt coin. There can be many sidechains, anonymous, fast, etc.. Even with smart contracts like Ethereum:)  It is much easier for Bitcoin to adapt to sidechain technology, compared to getting worldwide acceptance for some altcoin with sidechain technology.  But the fact is, sidechain technology is a huge advantage for altcoin compared to other alt coins.  Anyway, all those ideas can be obsolete compared to Thelonios+decerver technology. Check: https://thelonious.io/ and https://decerver.io/.

funny to come to this thread of FlorinCoin, when I was searching for this ^^

https://florinapp.com/

I have been working on creating hybrid assets of various altchains tokens and came to the conclusion that colored coins (thus my post above) was the way to go as it allows for hyper decentralization of the exchange of value among blockchains.

My basic approach to a provable decentralized chain exchange is:

 1. proof of burn coins or use a multi-million year time locks
        a. in this transaction, embed the prepared colored coin issuing transaction on the other chain
        b. hash tag
 2. Issue Colored Coins on external chain with hash tag



This creates immutable cross-referenced color coins fit for value exchange on the external chain

Bitcoin would be great for this application for security purposes and audience but the metadata political limit might cause problems if used for anything other then the color coin issuance.

Using a meta friendly blockchain like Florin would allow an auditable decentralized clearing-house platform that can track coins burned and colored coins issued on external chains.

Overall this provides a platform viable as a distributed cross chain clearing-house platform and enable hyper decentralization of the altchain token and asset trade.

I am interested in hearing your thoughts on this approach, on whether Florin should host this application protocol or should a fork take place to host this specific application.  As Florin is a Blockchain Tech creation, its seems a fork is the norm and is a good idea when the distribution of current currency is unknown, additionally the proof of work feature while proven might not be the best fit for this application purpose.  Yet I can't think of a better name than Florin and there is enough altcoins where reduce, reuse and recycle might be a smart choice. 

Just found about florincoin in the last few weeks and was impressed by the implications in the whitepaper.

How developed is the color coin system in Florincoin?
Is it protocol compatible with OpenAssets?

+1, I'm curious as well, thought the beta was supposed to start last week. Also, will there really be a new fork of BTC v 0.10? What's the estimated timeline?

Thanks.

So, when does the beta start?

http://florincoin.org updated

• New Mac binary released
• New Windows binary posted on the main page
• Added Alexandria to list of distributed applications

Some screenshots of the Mac client:






Thanks to Julian Yap for compiling this Mac binary!

Your reply might be too late.  The domain expired and it looks like it was snatched up.  Sorry!

[EDIT] My mistake...I was able to renew it. 

I would like to transfer the site to one of my domains

By the way, I've been live streaming work on Alexandria and Florincoin here: https://www.livecoding.tv/metacoin/ (going live now!)

Maybe you should ask blocktechceo?

florinexplorer.com expires tomorrow.  Unfortunately I don't have the time to maintain and improve the site.  If anyone would like the domain please shoot me a PM so we can arrange a transfer.

http://explorer.frankos.org:3000/tx/e708434173f99fa219ca692d267b2174680a540a4aeda860acaf20b6d6b30a34

 Incoherence in levelDB detected: Input spent not registered

what to forget them?