sorry i forgot... because it's too obvious for me
Topic: [ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit | Building Lightning Network - page 202. (Read 558212 times)
May 04, 2014, 03:54:39 AM
windows 8.1
sorry i forgot... because it's too obvious for me
sorry i forgot... because it's too obvious for me
May 04, 2014, 03:52:07 AM
Pls try re-downloading wallet from here
http://www.groestlcoin.org/downloads/
what OS r u running btw?
http://www.groestlcoin.org/downloads/
what OS r u running btw?
Hi all, I just joined and wanted to try mining this coin but I have a problem:
I cannot sync my wallet. It always tells me "6 weeks behind"...also added "groestlcoin.net add" in the debug console but nothing changed.
Any help pls?
I cannot sync my wallet. It always tells me "6 weeks behind"...also added "groestlcoin.net add" in the debug console but nothing changed.
Any help pls?
May 04, 2014, 03:43:29 AM
Hi all, I just joined and wanted to try mining this coin but I have a problem:
I cannot sync my wallet. It always tells me "6 weeks behind"...also added "groestlcoin.net add" in the debug console but nothing changed.
Any help pls?
I cannot sync my wallet. It always tells me "6 weeks behind"...also added "groestlcoin.net add" in the debug console but nothing changed.
Any help pls?
May 04, 2014, 03:43:10 AM
many thanks for yuor fast answer, how do you set in catalyst the r9 280x?
dafuq
did you first time use computer yestarday? are you time traveller from past?
May 04, 2014, 03:40:07 AM
Charts here: http://crypto-prices.com/GRS
May 04, 2014, 03:38:44 AM
Can someone tell me power consumption for r9 280x on stock voltage (1.2v) while mining Groestl?
I'm trying to figure if it's worth running at 1.2v and 7500kh/s or at 1.05v and getting 6300kh/s
I'm trying to figure if it's worth running at 1.2v and 7500kh/s or at 1.05v and getting 6300kh/s
May 04, 2014, 03:36:18 AM
many thanks for yuor fast answer, how do you set in catalyst the r9 280x?
May 04, 2014, 03:34:24 AM
someone have the conf for 7950 and a r9 280x? now I have
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
Read the OP - page 1
So, there is any that want to share the bat or conf file related to a 7950 and a r9 280x?
how does your .bat look like?
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k groestlcoin --difficulty-multiplier 0.00390625 -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u xxxxx -p xxxx -w 256 -I 20 -g 1 --gpu-engine 10?? --gpu-memclock 1500 --thread-concurrency 8192
after a lot of time and trying, this is my best conf with scrypt, I have stable:
r9 280x = 750 kh/s
7950 = 550 kh/s
Im not an expert:
I use default gpu settings Saphire R9 280x OC dual x
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k groestlcoin --difficulty-multiplier 0.00390625 -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u xxxxx -p xxxx -w 256 -I 20 -g 1 ONLY in my .bat : set gpu to default via catalys control center
I get 366Mh/min per Saphire R9 280x OC dual x ---- scrypt: 42900Kh/min
May 04, 2014, 03:14:33 AM
someone have the conf for 7950 and a r9 280x? now I have
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
Read the OP - page 1
So, there is any that want to share the bat or conf file related to a 7950 and a r9 280x?
how does your .bat look like?
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k groestlcoin --difficulty-multiplier 0.00390625 -o stratum+tcp://grs.suprnova.cc:5544 -u xxxxx -p xxxx -w 256 -I 13,20 -g 1 --gpu-engine 1080,950 --gpu-memclock 1500,1250 --thread-concurrency 8192,20900 --gpu-powertune -20,-10
after a lot of time and trying, this is my best conf with scrypt, I have stable:
r9 280x = 750 kh/s
7950 = 550 kh/s
May 04, 2014, 03:09:02 AM
someone have the conf for 7950 and a r9 280x? now I have
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
Read the OP - page 1
So, there is any that want to share the bat or conf file related to a 7950 and a r9 280x?
how does your .bat look like?
May 04, 2014, 02:46:32 AM
someone have the conf for 7950 and a r9 280x? now I have
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
Read the OP - page 1
So, there is any that want to share the bat or conf file related to a 7950 and a r9 280x?
May 04, 2014, 12:04:25 AM
We also need pool operators to patch this exploit - it has been known for at least a year... https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=4002.0
Legit miners should get out of that pool.
On the bright side - one of the two fake miner is donating to the pool
I believe that my pool is patched against this exploit. At least I don't see any suspicious miners and actual number of blocks is approximately equal to calculated. This used to be 3.7X more when I contacted OCMiner about the exploit.
If you are worried - try mining on NOMP pool (groestlcoin.biz), it is using a brand new stratum which doesn't have this problem.
It is kind of easy to check. The top two guys each have about 15% of the hashrate of your pool. They should find 15% of the blocks. Over the last 20 blocks, they found 6 blocks and 3 blocks respectively. 6/20 = 30%, 3/20 = 15%. It matches, therefore, they seem legit.
Yes, I do this check all the time. But what if high hashers are legit and some minor miners are sending fake shares? Or if somebody has 2 rigs sending normal shares and 5 rigs sending fake shares? In such case it'll just look as very unlucky miner.
So this worries me a bit. Does anyone know where to get this "fake share" miner code to verify that it doesn't work with our pools?
If you are on MPOS pool, then you can check "blocks statistics" and it'll show you some info like this:
As you can see, it is 5% above expected value. That's ok, I believe fluctuations like that a normal. But I'll make sure to keep an eye on this to make sure it does not grow.
For reference, the compromised pool had 200% all time average and 370% 7 day average.
May 03, 2014, 08:50:58 PM
We also need pool operators to patch this exploit - it has been known for at least a year... https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=4002.0
Legit miners should get out of that pool.
On the bright side - one of the two fake miner is donating to the pool
I believe that my pool is patched against this exploit. At least I don't see any suspicious miners and actual number of blocks is approximately equal to calculated. This used to be 3.7X more when I contacted OCMiner about the exploit.
If you are worried - try mining on NOMP pool (groestlcoin.biz), it is using a brand new stratum which doesn't have this problem.
May 03, 2014, 08:48:16 PM
What is a "fake hash"?
Have you been getting "share below target" messages?
Should now be fixed. Please double check.
May 03, 2014, 07:45:22 PM
May 03, 2014, 07:01:31 PM
someone have the conf for 7950 and a r9 280x? now I have
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
7950 --> 4,6 Mh/s
280x --> 4,1 mh/s
is it strange?
May 03, 2014, 05:19:18 PM
BTCCryptohunger.com will be disconnected for approximately 30 minutes today for some reconfiguration due to high load.
Please make sure you have back up servers set up!
Please make sure you have back up servers set up!
May 03, 2014, 04:13:58 PM
For testing, I turned the GPUs and some other background stuff off, and got as high as 2918kh/s from my i7-4770K (stock) with latest YAM. Thats of course awesome but it did make the computer completely non-resposive. Usually I dont run it -t 8 because of that, but its a powerful miner indeed
very nice! according to this Intel spec this pulls a max of 84w (TDP)
http://ark.intel.com/products/75123
so thats 2918kh @84w!
this is close to parity with GPU in terns of power efficiency (1.5x-2x)
AES acceleration FTW!!!
Even more impressing IMHO: As of now I'm getting 2375kh/s with only five threads - thats a fricking 475 per thread, while running four 750ti at the same time
edit: 54W for the CPU, btw
WHOA! that's 2375kh @54w!!!!
thanks very much for the feedback. perhaps you could add the numbers to the list?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hTOUdJZrKqrNDXTIbXgNvJtj_fnpECREcs-eHxaGrZc/edit
AES acceleration FTW!!!
Quote
thats a fricking 475 per thread
thats so fricking
May 03, 2014, 03:56:30 PM
For testing, I turned the GPUs and some other background stuff off, and got as high as 2918kh/s from my i7-4770K (stock) with latest YAM. Thats of course awesome but it did make the computer completely non-resposive. Usually I dont run it -t 8 because of that, but its a powerful miner indeed
very nice! according to this Intel spec this pulls a max of 84w (TDP)
http://ark.intel.com/products/75123
so thats 2918kh @84w!
this is close to parity with GPU in terns of power efficiency (1.5x-2x)
AES acceleration FTW!!!
Even more impressing IMHO: As of now I'm getting
edit: 54W for the CPU, btw
edit 2: updated numbers
May 03, 2014, 03:54:27 PM
To the best of my knowledge these syncing issues should have been resolved with new wallet releases. Please re-download your wallets before attempting to edit conf files.
Latest wallets are here:
http://www.groestlcoin.org/downloads/
cheers!
Latest wallets are here:
http://www.groestlcoin.org/downloads/
cheers!
Not on win32 at least. Wasn't synching at all. but finally synched when I added quoted nodes.
Jump to: