[ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit | Building Lightning Network - page 239.

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Manwe on April 11, 2014, 04:34:10 PM

WOW, MINTPAL, what a stupid choice, you will get nothing more than dumpers! GRS will be dead like HIRO.

Based on this coin's compelling algo which works well on multiple platforms it has a bright future. Any short-term dumping on Mintpal will only test the resilience of this mining community, which is strong enough to ride through.

Good performance on many platforms combined with lowered ASIC advantage is the ultimate goal of a PoW algo. Grøstl does it better than any other algo in crypto mining today.

What the hell? We stayed loyal and continued mining even without a dev for two weeks!
Wink

p.s. HIC! is the sound Godzilla makes when he chokes on a plane Grin

Manwe

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

WOW, MINTPAL, what a stupid choice, you will get nothing more than dumpers! GRS will be dead like HIRO.

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

What happened to the 0.5 btc bounty for optimized CPU?

Would be good to see more work on (more) CPU mining

neozbiljni

newbie

Activity: 41

Merit: 0

Quote from: griffinriz on April 11, 2014, 03:13:46 PM

can anyone share best settings for 7970 and 7950?

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
sgminer -k groestlcoin -o stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3345 -u -p -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --gpu-powertune 20 --temp-overheat 85

7970 Gigabyte 7970 GV-R797OC-3GD 6300+
280x asus 6300+

default voltage both

with I-24 they are mining bit more,but I was too lazy to test them more.....

edit:core clock 1090
mem clock 1500 both

krus4

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: extremist on April 11, 2014, 12:21:11 PM

Quote from: LordHelma on April 11, 2014, 11:40:21 AM

Quote

I have asus r9 270xs and now im getting 3,7mhs each. Is that like normal or way too low?

It's quite normal, 270X can have about 3,8 MH/s.

my old cheap hd5770 is 3.1MH/s. Wink

my r9 270x 4.37 MH/s http://saveimg.ru/show-image.php?id=3f532c5d6cda845b6b876646520135c4

jox

hero member

Activity: 681

Merit: 500

Quote from: griffinriz on April 11, 2014, 03:13:46 PM

can anyone share best settings for 7970 and 7950?

on OP page there is link...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Atmcd1XbwbURdFVhT0w5RXdvcUdKdXVQVUt1blZZSHc#gid=0

griffinriz

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

can anyone share best settings for 7970 and 7950?

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: playah on April 11, 2014, 02:31:10 PM

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 02:27:13 PM

can we move some hash to grs.suprnova.cc pls

I would love to, can you help get going, "I'm trying to mining at Supernova or cpu-pool.net , when I launch the miner it shows it working just fine but never shows up on either dashboard or under my workers.

sgminer -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://grs.cpu-pool.net:3650 -u playah.playah1 -p a "

Which miner are you using ?

Didi you run:

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

?

also it's suprnova not supernova

PS You have to wait 5-10 mins before any info shows

playah

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 02:27:13 PM

can we move some hash to grs.suprnova.cc pls

I would love to, can you help get going, "I'm trying to mining at Supernova or cpu-pool.net , when I launch the miner it shows it working just fine but never shows up on either dashboard or under my workers.

sgminer -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 -k groestlcoin --no-submit-stale -o stratum+tcp://grs.cpu-pool.net:3650 -u playah.playah1 -p a "

Which miner are you using ?

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: That Guy on April 11, 2014, 01:24:15 PM

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 12:45:43 PM

Yea I saw your post, you bring up a good point. I like what I'm seeing from Groestl, and its good to see that it brings Nvidia onto the same playing field as AMD for mining.

My previous post was more just to address the reason why I had reported the hashrate that I did. Don't want people to thing that I'm taking sides with any particular coin or algorithm.

Well said. NVIDIA will be huge for GRS.

thank you

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

can we move some hash to grs.suprnova.cc pls

That Guy

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 12:45:43 PM

Yea I saw your post, you bring up a good point. I like what I'm seeing from Groestl, and its good to see that it brings Nvidia onto the same playing field as AMD for mining.

My previous post was more just to address the reason why I had reported the hashrate that I did. Don't want people to thing that I'm taking sides with any particular coin or algorithm.

COMKORT

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Join COMKORT and trade GRS at an exchange with the most convenient interface and super-responsive tech support

71 coins X 3 markets

low fees

lots of great features

safe and secure

Try once, and you will not want to switch!

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: That Guy on April 11, 2014, 12:41:13 PM

Quote from: gitrix on April 11, 2014, 05:35:24 AM

Hi Groestlers! , see what in tweCoin ANN page :

Groestl 305w 2x ~~4,800Khs~~ 57c, 46c !!! Wrong
factory default 1020MHZ 5700 KH/S Boosted to 1150-12XX MHZ will 6.7 to 7MH/S

tweCoin ANN page : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-twecoin-twe-cpugpu-4-op-new-hash-no-premine-launched-553593
INFO From: http://dmdcoin.net/forum/index.php/topic,568.msg1307.html#msg1307

I was the one who performed that brief testing of the various algorithms, I can tell you that the results were note wrong, BUT from looking into this further, I can see why they appear that way. The testing I did was with running 2 threads with an intensity of 13 (increasing intensity had no affect), I did this, as with all current algorithms I had tested at that point, my cards performed better on 2 threads compared to 1, and 4800Khs was the max I got from them.
I have changed the parameters to 1 thread with intensity 19, and I do get ~5900Khs from them now.

I'll go back and update the results I got in the DMD forum when I have time, to reflect these findings.

I would refer you to my previous reply re tweecoin

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 05:54:47 AM

Quote from: gitrix on April 11, 2014, 05:35:24 AM

Hi Groestlers! , see what in tweCoin ANN page :

Groestl 305w 2x ~~4,800Khs~~ 57c, 46c !!! Wrong
factory default 1020MHZ 5700 KH/S Boosted to 1150-12XX MHZ will 6.7 to 7MH/S

tweCoin ANN page : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-twecoin-twe-cpugpu-4-op-new-hash-no-premine-launched-553593
INFO From: http://dmdcoin.net/forum/index.php/topic,568.msg1307.html#msg1307

"Algorithm: 4 rounds of hashing from fugue -> shavite -> hamsi -> panama (ASIC resistent!)"
A mish-mash of science algo appraoch. Thats a FAIL.
Energy efficiency only takes you so far esp if difficulty increases proportionally to energy efficiency (i.e. status quo)

The key feature of Groestlcoin is its good performance on a wide range of platforms and reduced ASIC advantages the algo contains. This is in part due to the Grøstl algo's resistance to parallelization.

Mish-mash science PoW's wont work similarly well on different platforms.

Would have done better to clone Groestl :p

Simply put Groestl is the most democratic PoW for crypto mining

That Guy

member

Activity: 75

Merit: 10

Quote from: gitrix on April 11, 2014, 05:35:24 AM

Hi Groestlers! , see what in tweCoin ANN page :

Groestl 305w 2x ~~4,800Khs~~ 57c, 46c !!! Wrong
factory default 1020MHZ 5700 KH/S Boosted to 1150-12XX MHZ will 6.7 to 7MH/S

tweCoin ANN page : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-twecoin-twe-cpugpu-4-op-new-hash-no-premine-launched-553593
INFO From: http://dmdcoin.net/forum/index.php/topic,568.msg1307.html#msg1307

I was the one who performed that brief testing of the various algorithms, I can tell you that the results were note wrong, BUT from looking into this further, I can see why they appear that way. The testing I did was with running 2 threads with an intensity of 13 (increasing intensity had no affect), I did this, as with all current algorithms I had tested at that point, my cards performed better on 2 threads compared to 1, and 4800Khs was the max I got from them.
I have changed the parameters to 1 thread with intensity 19, and I do get ~5900Khs from them now.

I'll go back and update the results I got in the DMD forum when I have time, to reflect these findings.

grimrog

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: fenghush on April 11, 2014, 11:43:05 AM

Quote from: grimrog on April 11, 2014, 11:27:36 AM

i dont know if this has been mentioned before, but i'd like to know if the wallet is prone to the recent hearbleed attack. I downloaded it and it says "no blocksource available". According to the tutorial in the first post i have to enable rpc calls. Rpc calls are the single source of entry for the heartbleed attack and are fixed in the latest openssl patch released a few days ago. Does the wallet-qt already have that patch?

Bitcoin rpc is only vulnerable if rpcssl is enabled and ssl certs are generated in ~/.coinname and if you allow the whole internet to reach your rpc port which is far from default.

But I agree it should be patched.

thanks, i didnt know that.

extremist

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: LordHelma on April 11, 2014, 11:40:21 AM

Quote

I have asus r9 270xs and now im getting 3,7mhs each. Is that like normal or way too low?

It's quite normal, 270X can have about 3,8 MH/s.

my old cheap hd5770 is 3.1MH/s. Wink

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

We need 1 or 2 more quality pools, fast!

child_harold

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Quote from: child_harold on April 11, 2014, 10:39:39 AM

Have prepared an Amazon AWS EC2 image.

Region : u.s - Oregon
Image: ami-12385222 Groestlcoin_1.0a
Login: ubuntu
Pass: F1R3fLy

Once logged in run "crontab -e" to edit the script with your worker.

Until I make the tutorial just use the Darkcoin one, replacing the info in it with the info above, thanks

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annxco-darkcoin-ec2-mining-image-and-tutorial-440455

Edited tutorial coming later today

TIP
Put the price the same as the minimum or a fraction higher. Disregard the Darkcoin tutorial with regard to this.
thank you

Just added another image for the EU Region

Region : EU - Ireland
Image: ami-0f748f78 Groestlcoin_1.0a_EU
Login: ubuntu
Pass: F1R3fLy

And another for Asia Pacific

Region : Asia Pacific - Tokyo
Image: ami-83afd682 Groestlcoin_1.0a_AP
Login: ubuntu
Pass: F1R3fLy

Once logged in run "crontab -e" to edit the script with your worker.

fenghush

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 250

Quote from: grimrog on April 11, 2014, 11:27:36 AM

i dont know if this has been mentioned before, but i'd like to know if the wallet is prone to the recent hearbleed attack. I downloaded it and it says "no blocksource available". According to the tutorial in the first post i have to enable rpc calls. Rpc calls are the single source of entry for the heartbleed attack and are fixed in the latest openssl patch released a few days ago. Does the wallet-qt already have that patch?

Bitcoin rpc is only vulnerable if rpcssl is enabled and ssl certs are generated in ~/.coinname and if you allow the whole internet to reach your rpc port which is far from default.

But I agree it should be patched.

Topic: [ANN][GRS] Groestlcoin | 1st to activate Segwit | Building Lightning Network - page 239. (Read 558212 times)