Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN][Grumpycoin][GRUMP] Grumpycoin | Now on Mintpal and Coinedup| 8 Exchanges - page 43. (Read 130128 times)

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100

Because we would probably not get to coinmarket.io fast, we should try to get to mintpal.com, which is also very nice and growing exchange. New coins are added every day and there's quite a lot of trade there. It will be good for GRUMP to get there.

To get listed at mintpal.com we need to vote for Grumpy Coin as many times as possible during the day.

Please register:
https://www.mintpal.com/register

Vote for Grumpy Coin 6x every hour:
https://www.mintpal.com/voting

For unregistered users it is only 3 votes.

We also need to donate some BTC to help to get to MintPal faster. Every 0.05 BTC will get us 1000 votes (1 vote cost 0.00005000 BTC).

This is a direct BTC address for MintPal donation. You can send any amount you like, even very small. Every donation counts!

Donate to get listed at MintPal.com
1Cq3EiuoB7ZmFQkG2EVAjCSgWj9cNVVQz8

https://blockchain.info/address/1Cq3EiuoB7ZmFQkG2EVAjCSgWj9cNVVQz8

If every one of us votes 10 times a day x6 votes it will be several hundreds votes daily! Just vote, it is FREE.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
I would definitely keep it 50 billion as it was stated in the initial coin post.

But let's keep it long term, so the coin won't die.

How about such solutions (10 or 20 years of mining):

~ 10 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000

      19 687 500 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 15625 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 15625 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 3 285 000 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

~ 20 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000
7/ 7,812.5   20000   156 250 000

      19 843 750 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 7812.5 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 7812.5 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 1 642 500 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

Keep in mind that with today price of 1 satoshi / GRUMP one block (initial 500k coins) is worth 0.005 BTC and 250k block is worth 0.0025 BTC. But the price for GRUMPY should rise, so with ~ 25 satoshi 7812.5 coins / block would be worth 0.00195 BTC, so it should still be a good reward for new miners.

What do you think??

I like it. 10 years is enought, I guess.
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Just thought of how it could be used. Unlike with btc and doge, where people actually tip a buck or two sometimes, with grump you would tip them insignificant amount of grumpycoin so that the monetary value is not even worth taking the time to transfer to your wallet. Maybe even so low that the transaction cost is more than the tip. Hahaha.

  Undecided

I think it would be better to give them to your friends when there Grumpy and having a bad day.. It would cheer them up real quick Wink
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 510
The Murraycoin Project ▪ Lead Developer
Just thought of how it could be used. Unlike with btc and doge, where people actually tip a buck or two sometimes, with grump you would tip them insignificant amount of grumpycoin so that the monetary value is not even worth taking the time to transfer to your wallet. Maybe even so low that the transaction cost is more than the tip. Hahaha.

  Undecided
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10

1% fees ( But we will be giving that back in prizes + More)
Thanks for everyone who made our Pool Party Possible we have had over 65 new miners in our pool in the last 24 hours this is amazing news for grumpy coin were running at 96.97% Pool Efficiency we have 77 miners and a pool hashrate of 63227.00 KH/s This is just the start our pool party is still going so jump in our pool send us your Grumpy Address and well hook you up Wink

http://grumpy.imine.at
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 301
*STOP NOWHERE*
developers, traders and investors are busy even grumpy is busy


This one is the best!
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
lol

i <3 this community Smiley

Join the IRC channel #grumpycoin
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I would definitely keep it 50 billion as it was stated in the initial coin post.

But let's keep it long term, so the coin won't die.

How about such solutions (10 or 20 years of mining):

~ 10 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000

      19 687 500 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 15625 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 15625 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 3 285 000 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

~ 20 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000
7/ 7,812.5   20000   156 250 000

      19 843 750 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 7812.5 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 7812.5 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 1 642 500 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

Keep in mind that with today price of 1 satoshi / GRUMP one block (initial 500k coins) is worth 0.005 BTC and 250k block is worth 0.0025 BTC. But the price for GRUMPY should rise, so with ~ 25 satoshi 7812.5 coins / block would be worth 0.00195 BTC, so it should still be a good reward for new miners.

What do you think??

I think that is the most sensible way to do it!!

AND THEN UPDATE ORIGINAL POST!! GRAPHICS, LARGER MORE COLOURFUL TEXT, AND EVERYTHING UPDATED!!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
I would definitely keep it 50 billion as it was stated in the initial coin post.

But let's keep it long term, so the coin won't die.

How about such solutions (10 or 20 years of mining):

~ 10 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000

      19 687 500 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 15625 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 15625 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 3 285 000 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

~ 20 years of steady mining

1/ 500,000   20000   10 000 000 000
2/ 250,000   20000   5 000 000 000
3/ 125,000   20000   2 500 000 000
4/ 62,500   20000   1 250 000 000
5/ 31,250   20000   625 000 000
6/ 15,625   20000   312 500 000
7/ 7,812.5   20000   156 250 000

      19 843 750 000

And after reaching ~ 20 billion coins stop halving process and keep it 7812.5 coins / block.

With 2.5 minutes blocks we have 576 blocks / day.

576 blocks x 7812.5 coins = 9 000 000 coins / day x 365 = 1 642 500 000 coins / year.

-------------------------

Keep in mind that with today price of 1 satoshi / GRUMP one block (initial 500k coins) is worth 0.005 BTC and 250k block is worth 0.0025 BTC. But the price for GRUMPY should rise, so with ~ 25 satoshi 7812.5 coins / block would be worth 0.00195 BTC, so it should still be a good reward for new miners.

What do you think??
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
OK, what about this one:
https://i.imgur.com/OJMvNpw.png

Block reward decreases 13% every 20,000 blocks
What do you think?

Yea something like that is what I was thinking.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
OK, what about this one:


Block reward decreases 13% every 20,000 blocks
What do you think?
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
OK, I've decided to keep the original 50 Billion coins top. If we want to have credibility we can't change the Max amount, so now I'm deciding how to make the future creation rate:

Our current creation rate looks like this:
https://i.imgur.com/RTY9RIk.png

Maybe we can change it to something like this:
https://i.imgur.com/GReym9Z.png

I'm open to ideas Smiley

templar, I'd say just change the equation of the curve so it's less steep, but still keep it an exponential. Although the wave thing (or something else wild) would be fun, it would probably hurt miners and overall interest. Unless it was called wavecoin people wouldn't understand and they'd get angry and loose interest when they barely got anything for mining reward after just having got a bunch. This would similarly effect price. Just a thought, not even totally sure I agree with myself.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Since the name of the coin is Grumpycoin, I think maybe a good application would be to start using it to tip people with bad attitudes or negative comments on forums.

It would be an interesting dynamic because although people would technically be rewarded financially for being rude or pessimistic, the reward would come with a little bit of shame. It's like an oxymoron.

I don't know exactly how it would play out, but a whole bunch of interesting behavior and hopefully lighthearted joking negitivism and tipping could develop. It would be a lot of fun. Bizarro Doge.

I don't know how to start that or make a tipbot or whatever on Reddit, but if someone likes the idea and knows more about how to set it up, I will definitely use some of my grumpycoins to tip haters. Much more fun than downvoting, don't you think?
I like that idea a lot Smiley

We need Stan to work on a tip bot for reddit and Youtube  Wink
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Since the name of the coin is Grumpycoin, I think maybe a good application would be to start using it to tip people with bad attitudes or negative comments on forums.

It would be an interesting dynamic because although people would technically be rewarded financially for being rude or pessimistic, the reward would come with a little bit of shame. It's like an oxymoron.

I don't know exactly how it would play out, but a whole bunch of interesting behavior and hopefully lighthearted joking negitivism and tipping could develop. It would be a lot of fun. Bizarro Doge.

I don't know how to start that or make a tipbot or whatever on Reddit, but if someone likes the idea and knows more about how to set it up, I will definitely use some of my grumpycoins to tip haters. Much more fun than downvoting, don't you think?
I like that idea a lot Smiley
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
I voted for 20 Billion, but I realize after seeing your guys thoughts that I was just being greedy. I just wanted price to go up.

Lowering the planned supply would probably have the opposite effect because of the negative image it brings, and if we have learned anything from other coins, the honest ones have a better chance of succeeding. This coin has a similar feel to doge. It needs to be fun and friendly, people need to trust it and enjoy it.

So, I change my vote 50 billion.

how can anyone say a coin needs to be trusted, and then say change the total limit in the very next sentance. changing anything once released makes investors/users/anyone think that if you change it once whats stopping you changing it again. and the whole store of value theory is lost.

Well no, I'm saying you shouldn't change the total limit, but I think I understand what you're thinking.

It was originally 50 billion and everyone thinks its 50 billion. The dev was saying he found an error in the code that made it actually 20 billion and he was asking if he should just leave it (which would effectively be changing it) or change it to 50 billion (which would effectively be keeping it). That's the way I see it anyway.

And I agree -  lets make this as honest and transparent as possible - 50Billion as originaly agreed.

If I could, I would tip you like 100k grumpycoin for supporting and agreeing (a large tip could be good). I would tip franky1 like 1 or 2 grumpycoin, cause he didn't like what I said (although I'm pretty sure it was just misunderstanding). The question is, where is the line from insulting tip to approval tip. I don't know, but it will be fun to find out!
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
OK, I've decided to keep the original 50 Billion coins top. If we want to have credibility we can't change the Max amount, so now I'm deciding how to make the future creation rate:

Our current creation rate looks like this:


Maybe we can change it to something like this:


I'm open to ideas Smiley
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I voted for 20 Billion, but I realize after seeing your guys thoughts that I was just being greedy. I just wanted price to go up.

Lowering the planned supply would probably have the opposite effect because of the negative image it brings, and if we have learned anything from other coins, the honest ones have a better chance of succeeding. This coin has a similar feel to doge. It needs to be fun and friendly, people need to trust it and enjoy it.

So, I change my vote 50 billion.

how can anyone say a coin needs to be trusted, and then say change the total limit in the very next sentance. changing anything once released makes investors/users/anyone think that if you change it once whats stopping you changing it again. and the whole store of value theory is lost.

Well no, I'm saying you shouldn't change the total limit, but I think I understand what you're thinking.

It was originally 50 billion and everyone thinks its 50 billion. The dev was saying he found an error in the code that made it actually 20 billion and he was asking if he should just leave it (which would effectively be changing it) or change it to 50 billion (which would effectively be keeping it). That's the way I see it anyway.

And I agree -  lets make this as honest and transparent as possible - 50Billion as originaly agreed.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Testing chinese design of the coin.
Do we have any chinese friends around here to confirm it's ok?
Using simplified chinese.

Title above is "Grumpy coin"
To the left "oh no".
To the right: "I hate you"
Below "In Grumpy we trust"

Well I hope you heard of veni vidi vici.



title above :爆币

the left:哦,不

the right:我恨你

below: 爆币,我们的信仰



Explosion currency
Oh, and do not
I hate you
Burst currency, our faith
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
I voted for 20 Billion, but I realize after seeing your guys thoughts that I was just being greedy. I just wanted price to go up.

Lowering the planned supply would probably have the opposite effect because of the negative image it brings, and if we have learned anything from other coins, the honest ones have a better chance of succeeding. This coin has a similar feel to doge. It needs to be fun and friendly, people need to trust it and enjoy it.

So, I change my vote 50 billion.

how can anyone say a coin needs to be trusted, and then say change the total limit in the very next sentance. changing anything once released makes investors/users/anyone think that if you change it once whats stopping you changing it again. and the whole store of value theory is lost.

Well no, I'm saying you shouldn't change the total limit, but I think I understand what you're thinking.

It was originally 50 billion and everyone thinks its 50 billion. The dev was saying he found an error in the code that made it actually 20 billion and he was asking if he should just leave it (which would effectively be changing it) or change it to 50 billion (which would effectively be keeping it). That's the way I see it anyway.
legendary
Activity: 4270
Merit: 4534
I voted for 20 Billion, but I realize after seeing your guys thoughts that I was just being greedy. I just wanted price to go up.

Lowering the planned supply would probably have the opposite effect because of the negative image it brings, and if we have learned anything from other coins, the honest ones have a better chance of succeeding. This coin has a similar feel to doge. It needs to be fun and friendly, people need to trust it and enjoy it.

So, I change my vote 50 billion.

how can anyone say a coin needs to be trusted, and then say change the total limit in the very next sentance. changing anything once released makes investors/users/anyone think that if you change it once whats stopping you changing it again. and the whole store of value theory is lost.
Pages:
Jump to: