Topic: [ANN][ICO] Bitcoin Growth Bot, Lending Platform​ 2.0​ [DECEMBER TOKEN SALE] - page 11. (Read 7835 times)

YEAH! Super hyped, really looking forward to some results!

Excited for this one after being scammed on Elektra and Credence. Have confidence in you Jordan!

Best plan forward right now is to first launch the bot and have it up and running being publicly viewed and third party tracked.

This will be one of the announcements (live leak!) and be done by Monday. The pre-sale will be finished by then and we should see a nice surge in NCL price.

Then do as many interviews as possible. The only tokens available to buy will be from Nucleus holders and price should really SURGE!

Agreed marketing is definitely important! Two announcements this week lets see what they end up being

Lets just hope we don't get to see another Credence scenario, NCL CEO must have full control of NCL coins which are not sold to the public, you dont want one of your devs steal and dump as we have seen happened with Credence, i still think its just cover story, devs simply could not deliver.


WHat is the latest  on Nucleus, number of coins sold in pre-ico, ICO cancelled...?


Why did Jordan stop giving interviews on youtube, this coin needs more love and marketing to get anywhere

Yeah those look to the two best options by far. Smart getting both! Looking forward to this project as it seems to be the only one that's transparent and not a scam!

Hello there!

The airdrop is still available?

How about NCL .... nclcoin.io or nclco.in or nclcoin.co or ncl.co.in or ncl.io

Still ultimately to be determined.

We will know that in the weeks ahead when the back end is being developed with the internal market and the lending functions if any migration needs to be made.

I will register both nucleustoken.io and nucleuscoin.io to be safe

Is Nucleus going to be a coin (have its own blockchain) or is it going to maintain its status as a token? Function on wave's blockchain? I guess the answer to this question will tell us its status I like .io better.

Just a few thoughts on .io vs .co  Most major email services are now sending email from or containing .co addresses directly to spam since its been around and used as a cheap domain alternative for quite a few years now.  This could definitely be a downfall especially for marketing reasons.  I read on a google article (I'll find the reference) that google classifies .io higher in search results than .co due to its recent high influx in being used with tech companies. 

As do I.  Just simply providing alternative options.

I like coin or token better than those two options

The end of the year is coming. The ico launches and disappears. Investors need to be more careful.

Nucleuscoin.io would fit in with the other platforms naming conventions recently which is good and bad.  Bad because its not original and it may induce the idea that its just another same old type of lending platform, but on the other hand its good because its a familiar naming convention that lots of people will know.

Could always do something like Nucleusnet.io, Nucleushub.io   ...

There we go, not a problem to burn the tokens that were going to be sold in the ICO. This is the way to go.


Yes, you can burn issued asset with full node.
Full Node
> Github https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/releases
> How to Install https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/wiki/How-to-install-Waves-node
> Config file https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/blob/master/waves-mainnet.conf
> Config file tutorial https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/wiki/Waves-Node-Configuration-File
API
> Node API - https://github.com/wavesplatform/Waves/wiki/Waves-Node-REST-API

Burn request - POST /assets/burn

curl -X POST --header 'Content-Type: application/json' --header 'Accept: application/json' -d '{ \
   "sender": "string", \
   "assetId": "string", \
   "quantity": 0, \
   "fee": 0 \
 }' 'http://127.0.0.1:6869/assets/burn'

Great idea. Excellent point. Are there any other idea besides Nucleuscoin.io?

Technically it isn’t illegal for US citizens to part take in ICOs but the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued guidance saying that US citizens can’t participate in ICOs however, there is not currently an official law. It’s just easier from a legal standpoint for companies to say no US residents are allowed, this prevents potential lawsuits in the future from the SEC, IRS or US residents.  The SEC considers some ICOs as securities, these are only allowed to be sold by licensed brokers in the United States, most ICO companies are not licensed brokers.  Another concern from a company stand point is being sued by a customer who loses funds because the company failed.  If a customer loses money and tries to sue they would have the backing of the SEC in some cases (given that the company does not exclude US residents).  As far as us residents purchasing on the exchange there is nothing holding them back from purchasing at any point since is anonymous more or less.  Plus the SEC would most likely not be to concerned with the small fish like residents who purchase these tokens or coins, but they would rather go after the companies who are selling them (theres more money to be made by the SEC that way).  Just remember if you purchase in the ICO and you’re a US resident and for some reason the company goes up in flames before launching (which it won’t) you have no legal leverage to recover any lost funds.