Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 203. (Read 97846 times)

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes you are right, I asked specifically Turkey because I m writing from Turkey nowadays and didn't see any cooperation news except that employee news(sorry I forgot the name)

Oh, i didn't hear the news about Turkey.

Well, our health system need some big improvements. So i hope ehealth first's one of focus country would be Turkey.

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 605

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

i do not remember exactly but i think they have members of all the countries mentioned in the team, I believe that the project will slowly expand at the global level, everyone needs to be healthier, i think now is the right time to do starting the ico they did well to postpone...

ImTotya

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 4

Quote from: aveon on April 25, 2018, 02:22:39 PM

Quote from: rjp55 on April 25, 2018, 02:14:49 PM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes you are right, I asked specifically Turkey because I m writing from Turkey nowadays and didn't see any cooperation news except that employee news(sorry I forgot the name)

The cooperation is always good, especially such a perspective and promising one. I hope everything will go as it has to be going.

If we draw conclusions based on the work done, I can say that this project will surprise us more than once! There will be new cooperation and partnership agreements.

aveon

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: rjp55 on April 25, 2018, 02:14:49 PM

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes you are right, I asked specifically Turkey because I m writing from Turkey nowadays and didn't see any cooperation news except that employee news(sorry I forgot the name)

The cooperation is always good, especially such a perspective and promising one. I hope everything will go as it has to be going.

rjp55

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

Yes you are right, I asked specifically Turkey because I m writing from Turkey nowadays and didn't see any cooperation news except that employee news(sorry I forgot the name)

BY_ATOM

full member

Activity: 406

Merit: 107

Quote from: loup on April 24, 2018, 03:39:38 PM

Quote from: belechau on April 24, 2018, 03:24:25 PM

Quote from: MandatoryOption on April 24, 2018, 03:15:43 PM

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on April 24, 2018, 03:01:13 PM

Quote from: the_donald on April 24, 2018, 07:43:07 AM

Quote from: Piggy on April 24, 2018, 07:35:11 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on April 24, 2018, 06:39:32 AM

Quote from: Frank37 on April 24, 2018, 06:02:32 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Quote from: cevap on April 24, 2018, 04:23:36 AM

Quote from: batako on April 24, 2018, 03:02:46 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.

postpone an ico when the market has low values can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.

Other projects walked at the same time and decided to move on, they will certainly have a late recovery if any. The wise decision of Ehealth will lead them to a higher level more easily, and the market tends to rise during its Ico

The current market situation looks much better than a couple of weeks ago. They took a wise decision postponing the ICO.

I think that now is the time for the ICO, the market is growing every day, the trend is very good.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

It would be interesting to know more not just about strategic partnerships and their progress with Turkey, but with other countries as well. I think they have team member from all those countries, if I'm not mistaken.

rjp55

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 250

CurioInvest [IEO Live]

Quote from: CryptoCutie on April 23, 2018, 01:37:14 PM

eHealth First cooperates with scientific institutions and companies in the USA, Russia, Canada, Turkey and the EU to achieve all the strategic goals.

I am curious, do we have any details about the Turkey partnership ? or as far as I can remember there is a team member from Turkey?

tudor_simion

member

Activity: 349

Merit: 12

Quote from: MattLeBlanc on April 25, 2018, 01:04:44 PM

Quote from: loup on April 25, 2018, 12:28:33 PM

Quote from: MattLeBlanc on April 25, 2018, 12:20:03 PM

Quote from: Amelie Poulain on April 25, 2018, 11:46:49 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM

Quote from: loup on April 25, 2018, 12:28:33 PM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much.

Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number.

One thing to keep in mind that there will be more ICO rounds after the one in July. So maybe next year $100 mil doesn't sound so much anymore. It's still a healthy sum and all but who knows what $100 mil are worth in 2024.

$100 mill will be worth 1000 BTC in 2014 Grin

Looking at the roadmap, it actually seems like a good idea to have ICO split into rounds that happen within 12 months each. It would be much harder for the team to get a lump sum in the beginning and then spread it over the upcoming years rather than making budgets for 12-month time periods.

This is a good idea, but investors do not like when there are unsold tokens in the rest. It's not necessary for the project to raise the hard cap. Soft cap 8000 ETH ~ 5 mln $, this should be enough for the start.

But if they release beta version and show some quality work then they will surely get more investment with trust of the investors.

That will be perfect. Investors could test the platform and see what is going to be capable of.

Yes, and it will also bring good amount of new investors into the project and which will in turn boost the morality of the present investors. Win win situation.

From what I saw, I do not think we'll see a test platform too soon. From what they say in the White Paper, we will have it in the end of 2019 - early 2020. But who knows, they can surprise us at any time. Of course we all want to see what we're investing in. Maybe they will hurry a little.

MattLeBlanc

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 37

Quote from: MattLeBlanc on April 25, 2018, 12:20:03 PM

Quote from: Amelie Poulain on April 25, 2018, 11:46:49 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM

Quote from: MattLeBlanc on April 25, 2018, 12:20:03 PM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much.

Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number.

One thing to keep in mind that there will be more ICO rounds after the one in July. So maybe next year $100 mil doesn't sound so much anymore. It's still a healthy sum and all but who knows what $100 mil are worth in 2024.

$100 mill will be worth 1000 BTC in 2014 Grin

Looking at the roadmap, it actually seems like a good idea to have ICO split into rounds that happen within 12 months each. It would be much harder for the team to get a lump sum in the beginning and then spread it over the upcoming years rather than making budgets for 12-month time periods.

This is a good idea, but investors do not like when there are unsold tokens in the rest. It's not necessary for the project to raise the hard cap. Soft cap 8000 ETH ~ 5 mln $, this should be enough for the start.

But if they release beta version and show some quality work then they will surely get more investment with trust of the investors.

That will be perfect. Investors could test the platform and see what is going to be capable of.

Yes, and it will also bring good amount of new investors into the project and which will in turn boost the morality of the present investors. Win win situation.

loup

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Quote from: Amelie Poulain on April 25, 2018, 11:46:49 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM

Quote from: Amelie Poulain on April 25, 2018, 11:46:49 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much.

Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number.

One thing to keep in mind that there will be more ICO rounds after the one in July. So maybe next year $100 mil doesn't sound so much anymore. It's still a healthy sum and all but who knows what $100 mil are worth in 2024.

$100 mill will be worth 1000 BTC in 2014 Grin

Looking at the roadmap, it actually seems like a good idea to have ICO split into rounds that happen within 12 months each. It would be much harder for the team to get a lump sum in the beginning and then spread it over the upcoming years rather than making budgets for 12-month time periods.

This is a good idea, but investors do not like when there are unsold tokens in the rest. It's not necessary for the project to raise the hard cap. Soft cap 8000 ETH ~ 5 mln $, this should be enough for the start.

But if they release beta version and show some quality work then they will surely get more investment with trust of the investors.

That will be perfect. Investors could test the platform and see what is going to be capable of.

MattLeBlanc

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 37

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much.

Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number.

One thing to keep in mind that there will be more ICO rounds after the one in July. So maybe next year $100 mil doesn't sound so much anymore. It's still a healthy sum and all but who knows what $100 mil are worth in 2024.

$100 mill will be worth 1000 BTC in 2014 Grin

Looking at the roadmap, it actually seems like a good idea to have ICO split into rounds that happen within 12 months each. It would be much harder for the team to get a lump sum in the beginning and then spread it over the upcoming years rather than making budgets for 12-month time periods.

This is a good idea, but investors do not like when there are unsold tokens in the rest. It's not necessary for the project to raise the hard cap. Soft cap 8000 ETH ~ 5 mln $, this should be enough for the start.

But if they release beta version and show some quality work then they will surely get more investment with trust of the investors.

Amelie Poulain

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 101

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

For medical industry it is not. But for a utility token, it is very much.

Fortunately 100 m is just for the hardcap one therefore it won't hurt anybody if ehealth failed to reach those number.

One thing to keep in mind that there will be more ICO rounds after the one in July. So maybe next year $100 mil doesn't sound so much anymore. It's still a healthy sum and all but who knows what $100 mil are worth in 2024.

$100 mill will be worth 1000 BTC in 2014 Grin

Looking at the roadmap, it actually seems like a good idea to have ICO split into rounds that happen within 12 months each. It would be much harder for the team to get a lump sum in the beginning and then spread it over the upcoming years rather than making budgets for 12-month time periods.

This is a good idea, but investors do not like when there are unsold tokens in the rest. It's not necessary for the project to raise the hard cap. Soft cap 8000 ETH ~ 5 mln $, this should be enough for the start.

wissy

full member

Activity: 658

Merit: 102

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 25, 2018, 04:49:32 AM

Quote from: levyashin on April 25, 2018, 04:10:39 AM