Author

Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 205. (Read 97846 times)

full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
April 24, 2018, 03:58:48 PM
Hi everyone!

Senior Expert in Software Development, Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Fabian Schütz:
eHealth First and future of medicine.
https://youtu.be/3uU85ePZN-U

All the details are on the website http://www.ehfirst.io/ and in the White Paper http://www.ehfirst.io/#wp.

The WHITE LIST is launched!
Please use the link to fill in the form:
https://ehfirst.io/whitelist
It takes 5 minutes only.
NB! After submission the form all investors participate in the lottery, in which 20 randomly selected winners will receive an additional 2 000 EHF tokens.

In May 2018, EHF Pre-ICO will be launched.
Up to 1 500 000 EHF tokens for sale.
Price at launch 0.006 Ethers.
Daily price increment +0.25%.
Bonuses of up to 40% is available.
Take a look on https://ehfirst.io

Thanks for sharing, always nice to see new videos on youtube about the project.
member
Activity: 349
Merit: 12
April 24, 2018, 03:46:21 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.

Other projects walked at the same time and decided to move on, they will certainly have a late recovery if any. The wise decision of Ehealth will lead them to a higher level more easily, and the market tends to rise during its Ico

Good projects, and public interest will go regardless of the situation. Even harder, but if the team does a good job I think it will be a success. Nobody likes postponement, but in some situations it is really necessary.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
April 24, 2018, 03:43:29 PM
yes the market is much better now, the bull is running and running. Lets break the 10k next  Tongue
newbie
Activity: 201
Merit: 0
April 24, 2018, 03:41:26 PM
Hi everyone!

Senior Expert in Software Development, Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence Fabian Schütz:
eHealth First and future of medicine.
https://youtu.be/3uU85ePZN-U

All the details are on the website http://www.ehfirst.io/ and in the White Paper http://www.ehfirst.io/#wp.

The WHITE LIST is launched!
Please use the link to fill in the form:
https://ehfirst.io/whitelist
It takes 5 minutes only.
NB! After submission the form all investors participate in the lottery, in which 20 randomly selected winners will receive an additional 2 000 EHF tokens.

In May 2018, EHF Pre-ICO will be launched.
Up to 1 500 000 EHF tokens for sale.
Price at launch 0.006 Ethers.
Daily price increment +0.25%.
Bonuses of up to 40% is available.
Take a look on https://ehfirst.io
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
April 24, 2018, 03:39:38 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.

Other projects walked at the same time and decided to move on, they will certainly have a late recovery if any. The wise decision of Ehealth will lead them to a higher level more easily, and the market tends to rise during its Ico
The current market situation looks much better than a couple of weeks ago. They took a wise decision postponing the ICO.
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
April 24, 2018, 03:24:25 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.

Other projects walked at the same time and decided to move on, they will certainly have a late recovery if any. The wise decision of Ehealth will lead them to a higher level more easily, and the market tends to rise during its Ico
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 4
April 24, 2018, 03:22:22 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.
Oh Yes now is the moment when you need to run sales! The market is on the rise and every day the growth increases by 2-3% This is a very good indicator. I hope that the team will adjust quickly enough!
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 12
April 24, 2018, 03:15:43 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...

You are right. So far it was a good decision to postpone the ICO. Now that the market finally shows some green again it would be an ideal moment to start the ICO. Can't wait now for the starting day.
full member
Activity: 406
Merit: 107
April 24, 2018, 03:10:12 PM
Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.
I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.
A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

Marketing and developement are 2 completly different things. Thats why usually a salesman is hired at some point. But that might be a bit expensive for this project.
Selling a project only on the base of its developement is hard but I'm sure the team can handle that. There are already many publications and interviews.
If they would pay with their token, it would be not so expensive.

Are you referring to a Bounty program as a marketing option? I think they already have one (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-ico-ehealth-first-ehf-up-to-400-000-ehf-tokens-2605734)
Oh thank you so much for referring to their bounty company. It is my great pleasure to take part. In the end the main purpose is to disseminate information to large masses!
hero member
Activity: 2968
Merit: 605
April 24, 2018, 03:01:13 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you  Smiley

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.
postpone an ico when the market has low values ​​can be a winning strategy, but no more than once in my opinion if more that one they lose the confidence of any investors, but at the moment the market is high and stable values ​​and i believe that even if the hard cap of ehf is high is not impossible to reach...
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
April 24, 2018, 02:36:51 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.

This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe
An important question will be if they can offer services which are cheap enough that people in poorer countries can afford it.

I would expect that they take into account different price levels for their services depending on the country, so that it's affordable also for poorer people.
member
Activity: 182
Merit: 11
Altair VR. Next-gen Blockchain VR Wikipedia
April 24, 2018, 02:17:03 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.

This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe
An important question will be if they can offer services which are cheap enough that people in poorer countries can afford it.
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
April 24, 2018, 02:09:51 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.

This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe
Yes, projects related to medicine should be considered at the state level, especially in countries where there are problems with this.
True, but they (the governments) would rather spend money on something that will bring them more money than on people's health. The bitter true...
full member
Activity: 490
Merit: 104
April 24, 2018, 01:25:26 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.

This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe
Yes, projects related to medicine should be considered at the state level, especially in countries where there are problems with this.
full member
Activity: 381
Merit: 101
April 24, 2018, 12:56:25 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.

This industry requires not only financing, but also maintaining proper accountability and responsibility, I live in a country where the medical industry is at a very poor level in comparison with the US or Europe
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
April 24, 2018, 12:53:38 PM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

I agree that medical sector is one of those sectors that demand a lot of funding, but we have to think also from the investors' perspective. If crypto market is ready to such huge projects yet.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
April 24, 2018, 11:11:29 AM
i am so glad that we finally entered a bull market again, so projects like ehealth will definitaly profit from it, onwards later.

There is a hope now. The market is on our favor and hopefully it will stay on the same path for a longer time. Ehealth and other projects must have a new passion right now.
Indeed, after so many drawbacks it was about time to see the market grow again. Now everything looks good for ICO's.
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
April 24, 2018, 10:59:05 AM
i am so glad that we finally entered a bull market again, so projects like ehealth will definitaly profit from it, onwards later.

There is a hope now. The market is on our favor and hopefully it will stay on the same path for a longer time. Ehealth and other projects must have a new passion right now.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 10
April 24, 2018, 08:54:11 AM
i am so glad that we finally entered a bull market again, so projects like ehealth will definitaly profit from it, onwards later.
hero member
Activity: 815
Merit: 502
April 24, 2018, 08:21:10 AM
Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.
Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.
There will always be advantages and disadvantages in every market condition, for example if its bear market, then people can buy ETH/BTC at a very cheap price to invest, its a very good way for people who want to buyback into crypto. Of course its not a good timing for hodler but not every people is a hodler.
Jump to: