Topic: [ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First - page 206. (Read 97846 times)

Quote from: Piggy on April 24, 2018, 07:35:11 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

100 million is not a huge amount if you look from the project's perspective. Medical sector projects demand huge investments as the R&D costs are very high and too many lives depend upon them.

beeelzebub

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 101

Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform

"The eHealth First project will allow everyone to get the most up-to-date, relevant and personalized information about
their health on the basis of an analysis of individual data, and an extensive library of world medical research literature and
considerations of the features of the local health systems."

This exactly why i really love ehealth first. Think about it, if there is a system like that, wouldn't you want to use it.

It can even bring lots of new people to blockchain. No-one can afford to left out something like that.

the_donald

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

Quote from: cantdecide on April 24, 2018, 06:39:32 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on April 24, 2018, 06:39:32 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you

I agree with that, but there is a limit to how long you can postpone before people lose interest. there are pluses and minuses.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Quote from: Frickeladm on April 24, 2018, 07:20:23 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

In the end a project can be posponed for better market condition yes, but there must be also solid work from the team backing the project otherwise nobody is going to throw the money at you

jonnytracker

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 261

Quote from: cantdecide on April 24, 2018, 06:39:32 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

Yes a proper announcement by the community manager would make sense. Not everybody is participating daily in this thread and getting news is kindof hard at about 350 pages.

What about the other social channels, I did not bother to check them yet. 250 pages is alot, Even the website is full of contents, its taking a while to load the page.

greatteager

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Quote from: cantdecide on April 24, 2018, 06:39:32 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

The fact that the projects postponed ICO on a record fall of the market is absolutely right decision. Today, the market is moving rapidly up.

Frickeladm

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

Yes a proper announcement by the community manager would make sense. Not everybody is participating daily in this thread and getting news is kindof hard at about 350 pages.

cantdecide

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 112

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Quote from: king_of_alts on April 24, 2018, 04:47:31 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

Of course it's a gamble but you can at least try if it is announced early enough. I am not a fan of postponing or streching of the ICO period last minute but well, in this case it was worth it I assume. The current situation seems much better then before, with some luck it even gets better.

Frank37

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Frickeladm on April 24, 2018, 12:44:27 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

Yes but its a gamble, nobody knows where the bottom is.
It could also have been that it had gone even further downward, would they have postponed the ICO again?
If you postpone more than once you are loosing confidence of the invesors, so it is a gamble.

hicaribou

hero member

Activity: 815

Merit: 502

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

If Aubrey would start to push for it, maybe they could get a lot of funds in any case. But as i already said, there is still a lot of time to go before the end of the ico.

Well its a thing when to play your cards. I think if they get someone more famous right now, it would blow the marketing effect out of the window because its too early.

It will be better to do it after the MVP is ready, so they will gain more trust and people will be easier to understand how the platform will work.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

Yes, some projects have postponed their sales and have been criticized for it but it really looks like a good move. There is no point in doing an ICO when the market hits rock bottom.

cevap

member

Activity: 490

Merit: 10

www.Zercados.com

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

As we can see now, the sale postponement was totally justified. The market is recovering and however, I'm still skeptical about reaching the hardcap, but I'm sure they will do much better with the sale in May, than it could've been in April.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: the_donald on April 24, 2018, 02:06:00 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

It could be that they don't reach the $100 mil at the time of the ico but when eth and btc go up later their funds could be worth 100 mil.

jonnytracker

sr. member

Activity: 672

Merit: 261

Quote from: Frickeladm on April 24, 2018, 12:44:27 AM

Quote from: MandatoryOption on April 23, 2018, 04:49:01 PM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

If Aubrey would start to push for it, maybe they could get a lot of funds in any case. But as i already said, there is still a lot of time to go before the end of the ico.

Well its a thing when to play your cards. I think if they get someone more famous right now, it would blow the marketing effect out of the window because its too early.

But the ICO is closing in. they should start to ramp up the promotion right about now.

I think their marketing is buried deep down inside the ocean of altcoins..

Frank37

sr. member

Activity: 770

Merit: 250

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: Frank37 on April 23, 2018, 04:13:35 PM

Quote from: Frickeladm on April 23, 2018, 01:05:27 AM

Quote from: batako on April 23, 2018, 12:28:06 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: JooBra on April 22, 2018, 01:20:06 PM

Quote from: BY_ATOM on April 22, 2018, 01:14:21 PM

Quote from: Trrrt on April 21, 2018, 06:32:04 PM

Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.

I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.

A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

Marketing and developement are 2 completly different things. Thats why usually a salesman is hired at some point. But that might be a bit expensive for this project.
Selling a project only on the base of its developement is hard but I'm sure the team can handle that. There are already many publications and interviews.

If they would pay with their token, it would be not so expensive.

Are you referring to a Bounty program as a marketing option? I think they already have one (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bounty-ico-ehealth-first-ehf-up-to-400-000-ehf-tokens-2605734)

I was referring to a salesman who is making marketing might be a bit expensive for this project.
They could pay the salesman also with their token, like they do it with the bountys, which are also almost all for marketing, except of some bug-bountys.

batako

sr. member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 252

Quote from: Frickeladm on April 24, 2018, 12:44:27 AM

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

Currently the market start to go to the good condition. Wish when the main sale will be started, the market is on the bullish one so ehealth can reach the cap easily.

the_donald

full member

Activity: 588

Merit: 100

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

If Aubrey would start to push for it, maybe they could get a lot of funds in any case. But as i already said, there is still a lot of time to go before the end of the ico.

Well its a thing when to play your cards. I think if they get someone more famous right now, it would blow the marketing effect out of the window because its too early.

But the ICO is closing in. they should start to ramp up the promotion right about now.

Frickeladm

jr. member

Activity: 182

Merit: 1

Yes i also think that the ehf team is good, they seem serious and competent. I think that they have the possibility to develop something in health care sector and blockchain, but maybe the 100 millions hardcap is a bit high with the actual market condition.

If Aubrey would start to push for it, maybe they could get a lot of funds in any case. But as i already said, there is still a lot of time to go before the end of the ico.

Well its a thing when to play your cards. I think if they get someone more famous right now, it would blow the marketing effect out of the window because its too early.

Piggy

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 1416